Inertial response

Shock-compression processes are encountered when material bodies are subjected to rapid impulsive loading, whose time of load application is short compared to the time for the body to respond inertially. The inertial responses are stress pulses propagating through the body to communicate the presence of loads to interior points. In our everyday experience, such loadings are the result of impact or explosion. To the untrained observer, such events evoke an image of utter chaos and confusion. Nevertheless, what is experienced by the human senses are the rigid-body effects the time and pressure resolution are not sufficient to sense the wave phenomena. 

In shock-compression science the scientific interest is not so much in the study of waves themselves but in the use of the waves as a means to probe solid materials. As inertial responses to the loading, the waves contain detailed information describing the mechanical, physical, and chemical properties and processes in the unusual states encountered. Physical and chemical changes may be probed further with optical, electrical, or magnetic measurements, but the behaviors are intimately intertwined with the mechanical aspects of the waves. 

While apparent from the amount of work that can be reported, it is obvious that we really do not have a comprehensive view of the dynamics of polar solvation at liquid interfaces. Especially lacking are studies probing the inertial response to the dynamics of polar solvation occurring at interfaces. There is enormous room for growth in the entire field as there exist such an extensive range of interfaces that are important in chemistry, biology, and physics. We can look forward to more detailed studies on the vast array of available systems. 

The total transient Stokes shift (v(O)-v(oo)) observed in our time resolved experiments of coumarin in bulk water was 820 cm"1. In the case of C343 adsorbed on Z1O2 it is 340 cm 1. From measurements of the time-zero spectrum, i.e. the emission spectrum of C343 before solvent relaxation, Maroncelli et al. estimated the Stokes shift from solvation to be 1953 cm 1 for C343 in water [8]. Thus the time resolution of our experiments allows to observe about 42% of the total solvation process. Especially the very initial part, containing the inertial response is missed. 

Solvation in water was extensively studied and processes on different timescales were described ranging from 30 fs to several ps [8]. Due to our experimental resolution the shortest decay time we measure contains various superimposed contributions from the ultrafast processes presumably the inertial response of water and initial librational motions of molecules in the first solvation layer. 

The differences between the two schemes are related to the fact that, in partition I, the division into slow and fast contributions is done in terms of physical degrees of freedom (namely, those of the solvent nuclei and those of the solvent electrons), whereas in partition II, the concept of dynamic and inertial response is exploited. This formal difference is reflected in the operative equations determining the two contributions to q as, in II, the slow term ( in) includes not only the contributions due to the slow... 

The Raman effect can be seen, from a classical point of view, as the result of the modulation due to vibrational motions in the electric field-induced oscillating dipole moment. Such a modulation has the frequency of molecular vibrations, whereas the dipole moment oscillations have the frequency of the external electric field. Thus, the dynamic aspects of Raman scattering are to be described in terms of two time scales. One is connected to the vibrational motions of the nuclei, the other to the oscillation of the radiation electric field (which gives rise to oscillations in the solute electronic density). In the presence of a solvent medium, both the mentioned time scales give rise to nonequilibrium effects in the solvent response, being much faster than the time scale of the solvent inertial response. 

We suggest that the additional (over the solvation dynamics in the pure solvent) sub-lOOfs transient observed in the C(t) of the hydrogen-bonding complexes of HPTA is due to transient changes in the hydrogen-bonding complexes of the type portrayed in Fig. 4 [1, 12]. The time scale is that of the heavy-atom movement within the O-H—O (hydrogen) bond in the electronic excited state of ROH. It resembles, yet it is faster than, the inertial response of the solvent [12-23]. 

The reaction force developed by the chest varies with the velocity of impact, so biomechanics is best characterized by the force-deflection response of the torso (25.6). The dynamic compliance is related to viscous, inertial, and elastic properties of the body. There is an initial rise in force, which is related to inertial responses as the sternal mass is rapidly accelerated to the impact speed. This is followed by a plateau in force, which is related to the viscous response and is rate dependent, and a superimposed stiffness component related to chest compression. By analyzing frontal biomechanics, the chest response can be modeled as an initial stiffness k = 0.26 + 0.60( V — 1.3) and a plateau force T = 1.0 -F 0.75(17 — 3.7), where 1 is in kN/cm, F is in kN, and the velocity of impact 17 is in m/sec. The force P reasonably approximates the... 

Brownian motion is the random thermal motion of a particle suspended in a fluid. This motion results from collisions between fluid molecules and suspended particles. For time intervals At much larger than the particle inertial response time, the dynamics of Brownian motion are independent of inertial parameters such as particle and fluid density. The Brownian diffusion coefficient D is given by the Stokes-Einstein equation as... 

The correspondence of this system to that of kinematic-wave propagation through fluidized beds, described in the previous chapter, is quite apparent in that case it is the particles which have to slow down sufficiently rapidly as the kinematic-wave passes over them. All that is now required is for the limiting condition for a stable response to be identified, so that it becomes possible to see to what extent this differentiates between known instances of homogeneous and bubbling fluidization. This calls for some means of quantifying the inertial response time. 

---