Income effect

Recently, Nyman7 took a fresh look at the traditional approach presented in Figures 7.1 and 7.2, which dates back to Pauly.8 Nyman argues that Pauly overestimated the welfare loss attributable to insurance, because he unduly included the income effect on consumption, whereas it should have been subtracted to leave the price effect. The income effect to be subtracted is due to the income transfer from the healthy to the sick. The pure price effect of insurance is the change in consumption of medical care that would occur if a consumer who is already ill were to purchase a contract from an insurer to reduce the price of medical care in return for an actuarially fair premium . In order to calculate the extent of the welfare loss of the insurance - which Nyman understands as the transaction cost of the insurance itself - it would be necessary to apply the classical Slutsky equation, but in practice it has yet to be quantified. 

Before the introduction of income cap regulation it was sufficient to analyse investments with respect to costs (because of cost coverage). In an income cap (or price cap) regulatory regime distribution companies also evaluate projects with respect to income effects, since the difference between the allowed income (stated by the regulatory authorities) and the total costs (opex + capex) constitute the company profit. 

The increased demand due to the price decline is in economic theory explained by the substitution and income effect. The substitution effect means that the product compared to other products becomes relatively cheaper and therefore the consumer substitutes others and buys more of the product. The income effect refers to the change in consumption caused by the fact that the consumer is able to buy more of your product with the same amount of money. This is not taken into account explicitly. 

The theoretical model predicts that reduction in work efforts will he proportional to the size of the benefit (income effect) and the implicit marginal tax rate on earnings of the program (price effect). The theory thus supports the view that the impact of safety net programs on work disincentives should be smaller in developing countries, for four reasons ... 

The theoretical arguments behind labor disincentives are intuitive (Ellwood 1988). First, any transfer provides unearned income, and thus inherently will reduce the pressure to work. The typical model assumes that beneficiaries will trade some of the extra income for more leisure. Beneficiaries will feel less urgency about taking a job or having all able-bodied household members working. As a result, people will not be as likely to work as they would be in the absence of the transfer program. This is sometimes referred to as the income effect. 

In Sri Lanka, Sahn and Alderman (1996) study a rice subsidy program that induces labor disincentives through income effects. They find labor reductions of approximately 10 percent. 

Martin, Will, and James Anderson. 2005. Costs of Taxation and the Benefits of Public Goods The Role of Income Effects. Policy Research Working Paper 3700. Washington, DC World Bank. 

Feridun, M. (2(X)5). The income effects of decentralization of population in Korea An econometric investigation. Regional and Sectoral Ecorumiic Studies, 5(1), 21-38. Retrieved from http //ssm.com/abstract=930896. Accessed 23 April 2008. 

During the substitution process the indifference curve is switched (from hago to Iiagi), because of an income effect that accompanies the substitution effect. The income effect means that the nominal decrease of the price of one good increases total utility, see Deaton, Muelbauser (1980, p. 35-36). 

Kingma, B. R. (1989). An accurate measurement of the crowd-out effect, income effect, and price effect for charitable contributions. The Journal of Pohtical Economy, 97(5), 1197-1207. Kollock, P. (1999). The economies of online cooperation gifts and public goods in cyberspace. In M. Smith P. Kollock (Eds.), Communities in Cyberspace. Lxtndon Routiedge. 

Introducing The Income-Effect Of A Price-Rise On The Demand Function -... 

In this section we shall analyze the overall effect of changes in the price level on demand. We introduce the income-effect of price changes on demand besides the usually considered price-effect. This will allow us to construct a new type of demand function representing the overall effect of prices on demand. These functions are different from the usual demand functions which only consider the direct effect of prices at constant nominal income. Because of the general slope of the usual demand function as a fimction of prices, the price effect - the move along the demand curve - effects all demand in a uniform downward way in case of a price rise, (All commodities are assumed normal - see assumption k.). In contrast to that, the direction of the income effect is not determined. It can affect demand upward or downward in case of a price change in either direction. 

While changes in the money income and changes in the price-level are often linked together the income effect on demand is still neglected in the analysis of inflation. It is frequently assumed that the redistribution of income, even if it occurs, cancels out in the aggregate and therefore has no relevance to macroeconomic analysis. The purpose of our analysis in this chapter is to show that a systematic - as distinct from a random - income redistribution does lead to a systematic shift in demand patterns. Demand for a specific commodity (or group of commodities) can either rise or fall with the general price level. 

Because the income effect is smaller than the price effect the change in real consumption is negative. Real loss of w ... 

Real consumption change for g income effect - price effect... 

Figure 2 demonstrates that any time the income effect is larger than the price effect real gain occurs. If we connect the points corresponding to that definition we get the demand function for the gainers in inflation (de). The characteristic of this demand function is that it rises with the price level. 

The first term on the right hand side of equation 3 is the income effect, IE (of a change in price), and the second one represents the price effect, PE. 

Thus the sign of the income effect depends on the sign of dy/dp. If this is positive the... 

If the income effect is larger than the price effect then dZ)/dp is positive. That means that the demand is an upward sloping function of the price level. If the price effect is larger than the income effect, then dZ)/dp is negative and the demand is a decreasing function of prices. Real increases and decreases in consumption (as a function of the price change) are represented by the difference between the income and the price effects. 

---