Impurity standards

Rearranging the above expression yields impurity concentration as a function of relative intensity, = Ral where represents both sample concentration and any background effects. The stabiHty of the cahbration must be confirmed at least every two weeks by analysis of a known mixed impurity standard. 

NAA is a quantitative method. Quantification can be performed by comparison to standards or by computation from basic principles (parametric analysis). A certified reference material specifically for trace impurities in silicon is not currently available. Since neutron and y rays are penetrating radiations (free from absorption problems, such as those found in X-ray fluorescence), matrix matching between the sample and the comparator standard is not critical. Biological trace impurities standards (e.g., the National Institute of Standards and Technology Standard Rference Material, SRM 1572 Citrus Leaves) can be used as reference materials. For the parametric analysis many instrumental fiictors, such as the neutron flux density and the efficiency of the detector, must be well known. The activation equation can be used to determine concentrations ... 

The development of in-house standards for impurities is often necessary due to the unavailability of a compendial impurity standard. The process of developing an in-house standard is the topic for another publication. However, there are aspects that should be addressed herein. These include the establishment and maintenance of an impurity standard. The establishment of an impurity standard is a difficult process. The method that has been developed to monitor the impurity level of the drug substance is often inappropriate or insufficient to monitor the purity of the standard. The process described above to develop a procedure to monitor impurities in the drug substance must be re-evaluated... 

In the monitoring of impurities by UV detection, impurities that elute at the solvent front and late- or noneluters may not be observed. Impurities that have a chromophore that is significantly different from that of the drug substance may not be accurately quantified unless a correction factor is used. Generally, attempts are made to isolate, characterize, and synthesize the impurity to create analytical impurity standards that can be used to accurately quantify the impurity. In the... 

Impurity Standard Preparation Transfer about 25 mg of USP 5-Benzyl-3,6-dioxo-2-piperazineacetic Acid Reference Standard, accurately weighed, into a 100-mL volumetric flask. Add 10 mL of methanol, and dissolve. Dilute to volume with water, and mix. Pipet 15 mL of this solution into a 50-mL volumetric flask, dilute to volume with Diluting Solvent, and mix. Use a freshly prepared solution. 

System Suitability The area responses of three replicate injections of Impurity Standard Preparation show a relative standard deviation of not more than 2.0%. 

Procedure Separately inject equal 20-p.L portions of Impurity Standard Preparation and Sample Preparation into the chromatograph, and record the chromatograms (the approximate retention time of 5-benzyl-3,6-dioxo-2-piperazineacetic acid is 4 min, and the approximate retention time of Aspartame is 11 min). Measure the peak area response of 5-benzyl-3,6-dioxo-2-piperazineacetic acid in each chromatogram. Calculate the percentage of 5-benzyl-3,6-dioxo-2-piperazineacetic acid in the sample by the formula... 

Whatever the sample matrix, ensure that blank matrices are available for recovery and selectivity studies. For impurity determinations, it is best to have impurity standards and degradation products available for selectivity studies and quantitative validation. For quantitative analysis of individual major components or impurities, internal standards are usually necessary to ensure precise quantitation. 

The test is not valid unless the chromatogram obtained with solution (4) closely resembles the chromatogram supplied with buclizine hydrochloride impurity standard BPCRS. 

TLC. 2.5 and 5 pi aliquots of sample and allylestrenol and impurity standard solutions were manually applied in 8 mm bands to HPTLC silica gel plates, which were developed by OPLC with cyclohexane-butyl acetate-chloroform (90 12 2) mobile phase. 

Finished product and active substance samples, reference and impurity standards and special reagents, if appropriate, are to be provided with analytical certificates in all cases. In general, sufficient quantities for about three analyses are to be supplied. 

Surface Activity Measurements. The surface activity displayed by solutions of humic substances and raw foam samples from Como Creek and Suwannee River stream and foam samples was compared to the surface activity of an impure standard of commercial surfactant sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) and surface-tension measurements for both sites are shown in Figures 3a and 3b. Como Creek raw foam and foam-extract humic acid showed the greatest surface activity, with foam humic acid contributing to a lesser extent (Figure 3a). In contrast, Como Creek foam and foam-extract fulvic acid and stream humic substances showed little surface activity. Fulvic and humic acids from Suwannee River foam and foam extract showed comparable surface activity to the raw foam, and all samples were less surface active than the SDS (Figure 3b). Stream humic substances showed little surface activity and were comparable to Como Creek stream humic substances. 

Accuracy is often determined by recovery studies in which the analytes are spiked into a solution containing the matrix. The matrix (placebo in formulations) should be found not to interfere with the assay of the compound(s) of interest. For stability-indicating HPLC methods, it is necessary to determine the accuracy of the active ingredient and that of all related compounds. It is possible to determine the accuracy of each related compound separately, but it is more efficient to validate these related compounds in a combined spiked mixture of all the related compounds at their appropriate levels. The analyst should be certain that the impurity standards used to spike the solutions are pure and do not contain significant impurities s that would effect the results. 

I believe that there are not. In fact, if purity means something like without changes or additions, then there is a sense in which isotopically homogenous samples are impure. Standard isotopic ratios have been measured for all stable isotopes and built into the elemental masses reported on the periodic table. These values reflect the outcome... 

Table 5.1. Impurity standards of primary and secondary lead (wt.%).

Figure 8. Influence of an electroactive impurity on the interfacial potential-dye concentration relationship. The x axis is the logarithm of the dye concentration, the y axis is the logarithm of the ratio of water volume to nitrobenzene volume, and the z axis is the difference between interfacial potential with and without the impurity. Standard potentials of transport for the impurity cation A (p — — 100 mV and for the anion A (p — +100 mV c = 1 X 10 5 mol/L.

Table 4.3 Impurity standards for primary and secondary lead (wt%) [10].

This test method will detect the following impurities non-aromatic hydrocarbons containing ten carbons or less, ethylbenzene, p- and m-xylene, cumene, o-xylene, n-propylbenzene, m- and p-ethyltoluene, alpha-methyl-styrene, m- and p-vinyltoluene and others where specific impurity standards are available. Absolute purity cannot be determined if unknown impurities are present. 

---