Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Imprinted polymer matrix

Ulyanova YV, Blackwell AE, Minteer SD. Poly(methylene green) employed as molecularly imprinted polymer matrix for electrochemical sensing. Analyst 2006 131 257-261. [Pg.428]

Figure 40 (b) Sketch of the morphology of an imprinted polymer matrix [444]. Parts (a) and (b) reproduced from [444] by permission of Springer-Verlag. (c) Illustrative drawing, showing how imprinted cavities can act as selective catalysts [445]. With permission of Wiley-VCH... [Pg.160]

Fig. 10.7. Schematic illustration of the role of proteins in directing positioning of the binding sites in imprinted polymer matrix. Fig. 10.7. Schematic illustration of the role of proteins in directing positioning of the binding sites in imprinted polymer matrix.
Domoic acid Biacore 3000 5 ngmL-i 16 Molecular imprinted polymer matrix, competition Buffer [52]... [Pg.204]

Prasad, B., Srivastava, A., and Tiwari, M. P. (2013). Molecularly imprinted polymer-matrix nanocomposite for enantioselective electrochemical sensing of D- and L-aspartic acid,... [Pg.612]

Deore, B., Z. Chen, and T. Nagaoka. 1999. Overoxidized polypyrrole with dopant complementary cavities as a new molecularly imprinted polymer matrix. Anal Sd 15 827. [Pg.1533]

Chiral synthetic polymer phases can be classified into three types. In one type, a polymer matrix is formed in the presence of an optically pure compound to moleculady imprint the polymer matrix (Fig. 10) (107,108). Subsequent to the polymerisation, the chiral template is removed, leaving the polymer matrix... [Pg.67]

The development of highly selective chemical sensors for complex matrixes of medical, environmental, and industrial interest has been the object of greate research efforts in the last years. Recently, the use of artificial materials - molecularly imprinted polymers (MIPs) - with high recognition properties has been proposed for designing biomimetic sensors, but only a few sensor applications of MIPs based on electrosynythesized conductive polymers (MIEPs) have been reported [1-3]. [Pg.322]

The current trend in analytical chemistry applied to evaluate food quality and safety leans toward user-friendly miniaturized instruments and laboratory-on-a-chip applications. The techniques applied to direct screening of colorants in a food matrix include chemical microscopy, a spatial representation of chemical information from complex aggregates inside tissue matrices, biosensor-based screening, and molec-ularly imprinted polymer-based methods that serve as chemical alternatives to the use of immunosensors. [Pg.523]

In addition to imprinted acid-base catalysts [49-55], attempts to imprint metal complexes have been reported and constitute the current state of the art [46, 47]. In most cases of metal-complex imprinting, ligands of the complexes are used as template molecules, which aims to create a cavity near the metal site. Molecular imprinting of metal complexes exhibits several notable features (i) attachment of metal complex on robust supports (ii) surrounding of the metal complex by polymer matrix and (iii) production of a shape selective cavity on the metal site. Metal complexes thus imprinted have been appHed to molecular recognition [56, 57], reactive complex stabilization [58, 59], Hgand exchange reaction [60] and catalysis [61-70]. [Pg.392]

This chapter will introduce the field of sensors based on molecular imprinted polymers (MIPs). MIPs are highly cross-finked polymers that are formed with the presence of a template molecule (Haupt and Mosbach 2000 Wulff 2002). The removal of the template molecule from the polymer matrix creates a binding cavity that is complementary in size and shape to the template molecule and is fined with appropriately positioned recognition groups (Scheme 15.1). [Pg.395]

Scheme 15.3 Noncovalent imprinting of L-phenylalanine anilide in a methacrylic acid (MAA)/ethylene glycol dimethylcrylate (EGDMA) polymer matrix. Adapted from Sellergren et al. (1998). Copyright 1988 American Chemical Society. Scheme 15.3 Noncovalent imprinting of L-phenylalanine anilide in a methacrylic acid (MAA)/ethylene glycol dimethylcrylate (EGDMA) polymer matrix. Adapted from Sellergren et al. (1998). Copyright 1988 American Chemical Society.
It should be noted that the presence of cross-links results in the partial or complete loss of control over the size of the polymer molecules, even if the living character of the polymerization can sometimes be preserved. Incidently, one of the characteristics of MIPs is that they are cross-linked polymers. This cross-linking is necessary in order to maintain the conformation of the three-dimensional binding sites obtained through the molecular imprinting process, and thus the ability of the polymer to recognize specifically and selectively its target molecule. Nevertheless, even with cross-linked polymers, the use of CRP methods may be beneficial, as it can, up to a certain point, improve the structure of the polymer matrix. Indeed, all of the above CRP methods have been applied to MIPs. [Pg.12]

A few studies have reported the embedding of an MIP film between two membranes as a strategy for the construction of composite membranes. For example, a metal ion-selective membrane composed of a Zn(II)-imprinted film between two layers of a porous support material was reported [253]. The imprinted membrane was prepared by surface water-in-oil emulsion polymerisation of divinylbenzene as polymer matrix with 1,12-dodecanediol-0,0 -diphenylphosphonic acid as functional host molecule for Zn(II) binding in the presence of acrylonitrile-butadiene rubber as reinforcing material and L-glutamic acid dioleylester ribitol as emulsion stabiliser. By using the acrylonitrile-butadiene rubber in the polymer matrix and the porous support PTFE, an improvement of the flexibility and the mechanical strength has been obtained for this membrane. [Pg.74]

Both of these MIP preparation procedures have their advantages and limitations [20, 21]. For instance, the size of the analyte molecule is not a discriminating criterion in covalent imprinting since the template selectively determines the interaction sites. In contrast, non-covalent imprinting has the advantage of being simpler since an additional synthetic step is not required to introduce the template into the polymer matrix. Moreover, removal of the template via extraction with the suitable solvent solution is simple and mostly complete for the non-covalent imprinting. [Pg.172]


See other pages where Imprinted polymer matrix is mentioned: [Pg.408]    [Pg.391]    [Pg.124]    [Pg.298]    [Pg.310]    [Pg.408]    [Pg.391]    [Pg.124]    [Pg.298]    [Pg.310]    [Pg.189]    [Pg.134]    [Pg.175]    [Pg.826]    [Pg.146]    [Pg.187]    [Pg.140]    [Pg.249]    [Pg.102]    [Pg.31]    [Pg.397]    [Pg.398]    [Pg.398]    [Pg.398]    [Pg.400]    [Pg.403]    [Pg.404]    [Pg.405]    [Pg.412]    [Pg.417]    [Pg.208]    [Pg.363]    [Pg.189]    [Pg.5]    [Pg.31]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.157 ]




SEARCH



Imprinted polymers

Imprinting Matrices

Polymer matrices

© 2024 chempedia.info