Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Imprint limitations

Possible applications of MIP membranes are in the field of sensor systems and separation technology. With respect to MIP membrane-based sensors, selective ligand binding to the membrane or selective permeation through the membrane can be used for the generation of a specific signal. Practical chiral separation by MIP membranes still faces reproducibility problems in the preparation methods, as well as mass transfer limitations inside the membrane. To overcome mass transfer limitations, MIP nanoparticles embedded in liquid membranes could be an alternative approach to develop chiral membrane separation by molecular imprinting [44]. [Pg.136]

In the elucidation of retention mechanisms, an advantage of using enantiomers as templates is that nonspecific binding, which affects both enantiomers equally, cancels out. Therefore the separation factor (a) uniquely reflects the contribution to binding from the enantioselectively imprinted sites. As an additional comparison the retention on the imprinted phase is compared with the retention on a nonimprinted reference phase. The efficiency of the separations is routinely characterized by estimating a number of theoretical plates (N), a resolution factor (R ) and a peak asymmetry factor (A ) [19]. These quantities are affected by the quality of the packing and mass transfer limitations, as well as of the amount and distribution of the binding sites. [Pg.154]

In spite of the fact that molecular imprinting allows materials to be prepared with high affinity and selectivity for a given target molecule, a number of limitations of the materials prevent their use in real applications. The main limitations are ... [Pg.166]

In summary, the present limitations in saturation capacities and selectivity of imprinted polymers preclude their applications in the above-mentioned preparative separation formats. [Pg.180]

Equation (65) illustrates that in the limit of ultrashort pulses the two-pathway method loses its value as a coherence spectroscopy 8s is fixed at it/2 irrespective of the system parameters. From the physical perspective, when the excitation is much shorter than the system time scales, the channel phase carries no imprint of the system dynamics since the interaction time does not suffice to observe dynamical processes. [Pg.182]

In a further application of MI-SPE, theophylline could be separated from the structurally related caffeine by combining the specific extraction with pulsed elution, resulting in sharp baseline-separated peaks, which on the other hand was not possible when a theophylline imprinted polymer was used as stationary phase for HPLC. A detection limit of 120 ng mb1 was obtained, corresponding to a mass detection limit of only 2.4 ng [45]. This combination of techniques was also used for the determination of nicotine in tobacco. Nicotine is the main alkaloid in tobacco and is the focus of intensive HPLC or GC analyses due to its health risk to active and passive consumers. However, HPLC- and GC-techniques are time-consuming as well as expensive, due to the necessary pre-purification steps required because the sample matrices typically contain many other organic compounds besides nicotine. However, a simple pre-concentration step based on MI-SPE did allow faster determination of nicotine in tobacco samples. Mullett et al. obtained a detection limit of 1.8 jig ml 1 and a mass detection limit of 8.45 ng [95]. All these examples demonstrate the high potential of MI-SPE to become a broadly applicable sample pre-purification tool. [Pg.146]

Monodisperse microspheres imprinted with theophylline or 17 (3-estradiol were used in competitive radioimmunoassays showing the MIP s high selectivity for the template molecule. In this case the assay is based on the competition of the target molecule with its radioactively labeled analogue for a limited number of antibody binding sites [77,118]. Figure 15 demonstrates that displacing the radioactively marked theophylline from the imprinted polymer was only possible with theophylline as competitor. Structurally related molecules showed effects solely at elevated concentrations [77]. [Pg.153]

Molecular imprinting is not limited to organic polymer matrices, but can also be applied to silica-based materials and even proteins. Proteins freeze-dried in the presence of a transition state analogue as template have been used successfully as catalysts, e.g., for the dehydrofluorination of a fluorobutanone. For instance, lyophilized 3-lactoglobulin imprinted in this manner with N-isopropyl-N-ni-trobenzyl-amine could accelerate the dehydrofluorination by a factor of 3.27 compared to the non-imprinted protein see Table 5 [62]. In a similar procedure, BSA was imprinted with N-methyl-N-(4-nitrobenzyl)-S-aminovaleric acid and showed an enhancement of the catalytic effect by a factor of 3.3 compared to the control protein for the same reaction see Table 5 [113]. [Pg.157]

Rather than using the protein molecule as a whole, the imprinting of selected protein epitopes may present a more practical approach. Imprints of such patches may then act as receptors for these parts of the protein. It could be shown that an MIP imprinted with a tetrapeptide was able to recognize not only the template but also a protein bearing the same 3-amino acid terminus as the peptide template [129]. If this approach proves to be successful in other cases as well, MI-based recognition will no longer be limited to small molecules. The result will be even more antibody like biomimetic polymers. [Pg.158]

Some limitations of this molecular imprinting technique are obvious the template must be available in preparative amounts, it must be soluble in the monomer mixture and it must be stable and unreactive under the conditions of the polymerization. The solvent must be chosen considering the stability of the monomer-template assemblies and it should result in the porous structure necessary for rapid kinetics of the template interaction with the binding sites. If these criteria are satisfied, a robust material capable of selectively rebinding the template can be easily prepared and evaluated in a short period of time. [Pg.478]


See other pages where Imprint limitations is mentioned: [Pg.309]    [Pg.4]    [Pg.14]    [Pg.151]    [Pg.157]    [Pg.169]    [Pg.175]    [Pg.181]    [Pg.107]    [Pg.427]    [Pg.733]    [Pg.154]    [Pg.19]    [Pg.29]    [Pg.163]    [Pg.169]    [Pg.181]    [Pg.187]    [Pg.193]    [Pg.19]    [Pg.138]    [Pg.26]    [Pg.303]    [Pg.372]    [Pg.218]    [Pg.56]    [Pg.249]    [Pg.110]    [Pg.61]    [Pg.135]    [Pg.147]    [Pg.148]    [Pg.148]    [Pg.154]    [Pg.528]    [Pg.57]    [Pg.24]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.43 ]




SEARCH



© 2024 chempedia.info