Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Hydrodynamics fluidization

Interparticle Forces. Interparticle forces are often neglected in the fluidization Hterature, although in many cases these forces are stronger than the hydrodynamic ones used in most correlations. The most common interparticle forces encountered in gas fluidized beds are van der Waals, electrostatic, and capillary. [Pg.73]

The first commercial fluidized bed polyeth)4eue plant was constructed by Union Carbide in 1968. Modern units operate at 100°C and 32 MPa (300 psig). The bed is fluidized with ethylene at about 0.5 m/s and probably operates near the turbulent fluidization regime. The excellent mixing provided by the fluidized bed is necessary to prevent hot spots, since the unit is operated near the melting point of the product. A model of the reactor (Fig. 17-25) that coupes Iduetics to the hydrodynamics was given by Choi and Ray, Chem. Eng. ScL, 40, 2261, 1985. [Pg.1573]

Cheremisinoff, N. P. and P. N. Cheremisinoff, Hydrodynamics of Gas-Solids Fluidization, Gulf Publishers, Houston, TX, 1984. [Pg.487]

Hydrodynamics, Heat and Mass Transfer in Inverse and Circulating Three-Phase Fluidized-Bed Reactors for WasteWater Treatment... [Pg.101]

Recent research development of hydrodynamics and heat and mass transfer in inverse and circulating three-phase fluidized beds for waste water treatment is summarized. The three-phase (gas-liquid-solid) fluidized bed can be utilized for catalytic and photo-catalytic gas-liquid reactions such as chemical, biochemical, biofilm and electrode reactions. For the more effective treatment of wastewater, recently, new processing modes such as the inverse and circulation fluidization have been developed and adopted to circumvent the conventional three-phase fluidized bed reactors [1-6]. [Pg.101]

To provide the pr equisite knowledge for designing the three-phase fluidized-bed reactors with new modes, the hydrodynamics such as phase holdup, mixing and bubble properties and heat and mass transfer characteristics in the reactors have to be determined. Thus, in this study, the hydrodynamics and heat and mass transfer characteristics in the inverse and circulating three-phase fluidized-bed reactors for wastewater treatment in the present and previous studies have been summarized. Correlations for the hydrod3aiamics as well as mass and heat transfer coefficients are proposed. The areas wherein future research should be undertaken to improve... [Pg.101]

THREE-PHASE CmCULATING FLUIDIZED-BED REACTORS 3.1. Hydrodynamics... [Pg.104]

Huan et al. [41] measured the behavior of a small fluidized bed consisting of 45-80 mustard seeds in a small-bore vertical magnet. The small sample size allowed short pulses, and spatial distribution of collision correlation times and granular temperature were measured directly and compared with the hydrodynamic theory of Garzo and Dufty [42], This paper [41] contains an excellent survey of previous experiments on fluidized beds. [Pg.505]

Another survey by Ibl (13) in 1963 listed 13 mass-transfer correlations established by the limiting-current method, only four of which were derived from quantitative considerations. At the time of writing the total number of publications is more than 200. The majority of these concern flow conditions under which theoretical predictions are, at best, qualitative. More recently, an increasing number of publications deal with model hydrodynamic studies of more complex situations, for example, packed and fluidized beds. [Pg.218]

Glicksman and McAndrews (1985) determined the effect of bed width on the hydrodynamics of large particle bubbling beds. Sand particles with a mean diameter of 1 mm were fluidized by air at ambient conditions. The bed width ranged from 7.6 cm to 122 cm while the other cross sectional dimension remained constant at 122 cm. Most experiments were carried out with an open bed. The bubble rise velocity increased with the bed width, in the representation of bubble velocity as... [Pg.17]

A technique which can assist in the scale-up of commercial plants designs is the use of scale models. A scale model is an experimental model which is smaller than the hot commercial bed but which has identical hydrodynamic behavior. Usually the scale model is fluidized with air at ambient conditions and requires particles of a different size and density than those used in the commercial bed. The scale model relies on the theory of similitude, sometimes through use of Buckingham s pi theorem, to design a model which gives identical hydrodynamic behavior to the commercial bed. Such a method is used in the wind tunnel testing of small model aircraft or in the towing tank studies of naval vessels. [Pg.26]

Once a technique has been established to design a model which simulates the hydrodynamics of a hot (possibly pressurized) fluidized bed, then a series of different sized models can be used to determine the influence of bed size on the performance of commercial beds, see Fig. 20. Model A simulates the behavior of commercial bed A, model B simulates a larger commercial bed B and so forth. Then by comparing models A, B with C we can determine the expected changes in operating characteristics when commercial bed A is replaced by larger beds B and C. [Pg.26]

Designing a model fluidized bed which simulates the hydrodynamics of a commercial bed requires accounting for all of the mechanical forces in the system. In some instances, convective heat transfer can also be scaled but, at present, proper scaling relationships for chemical reactions or hydromechanical effects, such as particle attrition or the rate of tube erosion, have not been established. [Pg.26]

Fitzgerald et al. (1984) measured pressure fluctuations in an atmospheric fluidized bed combustor and a quarter-scale cold model. The full set of scaling parameters was matched between the beds. The autocorrelation function of the pressure fluctuations was similar for the two beds but not within the 95% confidence levels they had anticipated. The amplitude of the autocorrelation function for the hot combustor was significantly lower than that for the cold model. Also, the experimentally determined time-scaling factor differed from the theoretical value by 24%. They suggested that the differences could be due to electrostatic effects. Particle sphericity and size distribution were not discussed failure to match these could also have influenced the hydrodynamic similarity of the two beds. Bed pressure fluctuations were measured using a single pressure point which, as discussed previously, may not accurately represent the local hydrodynamics within the bed. Similar results were... [Pg.69]

As fluidized beds are scaled up from bench scale to commercial plant size the hydrodynamic behavior of the bed changes, resulting, in many cases, in a loss of performance. Although there have been some studies of the influence of bed diameter on overall performance as well as detailed behavior such as solids mixing and bubble characteristics, generalized rules to guide scale-up are not available. The influence of bed diameter on performance will differ for different flow regimes of fluidization. [Pg.100]

Arena, U., Cammarota, A., Massimilla, L., and Pirozzi, D., The Hydrodynamic Behavior of Two Circulating Fluidized Bed Units of Different Size, Circulating Fluidized Bed Technol. 11, (P. Basu, and J. F. Large, eds.), Pergamon Press, Oxford (1988)... [Pg.104]

Bi, H. T., Grace, J. R., and Zhu. J., Propagation of Pressure Waves and Forced Oscillations in Gas-solid Fluidized Beds and their Influence on Diagnostics of Local Hydrodynamics, Powder Technol., 82 239 (1995)... [Pg.105]

Farrell, P. A., Hydrodynamic Scaling and Solids Mixing in Pressurized Fluidized Bed Combustors, Ph.D. Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (1996)... [Pg.105]

Glicksman, L. R., and McAndrews, G., The Effect of Bed Width on the Hydrodynamics of Large Particle Fluidized Beds, Powder Technol., 42 159... [Pg.106]

Glicksman, L. R., Yule, T., Dymess, A., and Carson, R., Scaling the Hydrodynamics of Fluidized Bed Combustors with Cold Models ... [Pg.106]

Glicksman, L. R., and Farrell, P., Verification of Simplified Hydrodynamic Scaling Laws for Pressurized Fluidized Beds Part I Bubbling Fluidized... [Pg.107]

Glicksman, L. R., Hyre, M., Torpey, M., and Wheeldon, J., Verification of Simplified Hydrodynamic Scaling Laws for Pressurized Fluidized Beds Part II Circulating Fluidized Beds, Proc. 13th Int. Conf. for Fluidized Bed Combustion, ip. 991 (1995)... [Pg.107]


See other pages where Hydrodynamics fluidization is mentioned: [Pg.204]    [Pg.204]    [Pg.73]    [Pg.73]    [Pg.83]    [Pg.1566]    [Pg.1567]    [Pg.1896]    [Pg.414]    [Pg.297]    [Pg.143]    [Pg.106]    [Pg.557]    [Pg.292]    [Pg.4]    [Pg.4]    [Pg.6]    [Pg.22]    [Pg.26]    [Pg.66]    [Pg.69]    [Pg.70]    [Pg.70]    [Pg.77]    [Pg.80]    [Pg.80]    [Pg.89]    [Pg.94]    [Pg.96]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.177 , Pg.178 ]




SEARCH



Circulating fluidized beds hydrodynamics

Dense-phase fluidized beds hydrodynamics

Fast fluidization hydrodynamics

Fast fluidized beds hydrodynamics

Hydrodynamic Models of Fluidization

Hydrodynamics minimum fluidization velocity

Hydrodynamics of circulating fluidized beds

© 2024 chempedia.info