Hydrodynamic quantities

Additional research on the prediction of flow patterns is a necessity, for until detailed stability criteria are developed for the transition from one flow pattern to another, there is no alternative to the empirical flow pattern charts. Some progress in theoretically defining the transition from stratified to wavy or slug flow has been made by Russell and Etchells (R3). Inaccuracy and uncertainty in flow pattern prediction makes estimation of the in situ hydrodynamic quantities and the rate of heat transfer a difficult task. 

The diameter d of a polymer chain can be estimated from (1) hydrodynamic quantities such as intrinsic viscosity and sedimentation coefficient, (2) the partial specific volume vgp of the polymer, and (3) X-ray crystallographic data of the polymer. Table 2 lists the values of d for liquid-crystalline polymers estimated by different methods. Those determined from hydrodynamic data are close to but slightly larger than those from vsp and crystallographic data, though this may not always be the case. 

The fluid resistance experienced by a macromolecular solute moving in dilute solution depends on the shape and size of the molecule. A number of physical quantities have been introduced to express this. Typical ones are intrinsic viscosity [ry], limiting sedimentation coefficient s0, and limiting diffusion coefficient D0. The first is related to the rotation of the solute, while the last two are concerned with the translational motion of the solute. A wealth of theoretical and experimental information about these hydrodynamic quantities is already available for randomly coiled chains (40, 60). However, the corresponding information on non-randomly coiled polymers is as yet rather limited in number and in variety. 

Interpretation of the hydrodynamic data of a macromolecule requires that the shape of the molecule in a given solvent be known in advance from other sources and that there exist adequate expressions to relate the hydrodynamic quantities under consideration to a few parameters characterizing the dimensions of the molecule. Thus, in general, hydrodynamic measurements are informative as a supplementary means for the characterization of macromolecules. 

Dielectric dispersion measurements also provide a means of determining rotational diffusion coefficients or mean rotational relaxation times of solute molecules. In principle, data for these hydrodynamic quantities can be used for a... 

In the first one,the apparent reaction rate is empirically related to the operating conditions on the basis of experimental observations. The models suggested by Henry et al. (3) and by Mears (4) belong to this category. The apparent reaction rate is assumed to be proportional to the liquid holdup in the first model and to the catalyst irrigation rate in the second one. These hydrodynamic quantities are estimated using empirical correlations based on experiments. 

The use of models and particularly those of a sophisticated nature is, however, seriously restricted by the limitations of the parameters involved in the model equations. It is actually the determination of certain parameters which becomes the crucial point in designing. The major uncertainties originate from two sources. Firstly, the process data, i.e. estimation of phase equilibria (solubilities), diffusivities and especially kinetic rate data,involves inaccuracies. The second major source of large uncertainties is the reliability of the nonadjustable hydrodynamic quantities. 

Kd and Od are shape- and solvation-dependent constants, qd can be expressed through the exponents of the relationships between molecular weight and other hydrodynamic quantities [see Equation (8-61)]. 

Making an analogy between the sites of the lattice and the particles of the bed, one may define the following hydrodynamic quantities characterizing the local state of irrigation ... 

The change of scale or volume averaging between the particle and bed scales is ruled by the percolation process i.e., by the velocity distribution defined by Eq.5. The averaging formula depends on the nature of the hydrodynamic quantity which has to be averaged. Applications presented hereafter will concern the bed scale averaging of extensive quantities and of the axial dispersion coefficient... 

Universal relationships with hydrodynamic quantities (Oono and Kohmoto, 1983) (Ileprintwl with permission from Y.Oono, M.Kohmoto. J. Chem. Phys. 78 (1983) 520-528. Copyright 1983 American Institute of Physics]... 

Oono (1983) has applied the method of renormalization group transformations for hydrodynamic quantities in the whole crossover region. In this ca.se, the complete renormalization group equation 17 should be considered, with its general solution of the form... 

The hydrodynamic quantities and their ratios have been calculated as functions of the crossover parameters and S ... 

However, the S dependence of the hydrodynamic quantities has proved to be weak, i.c. the draining effect of a molecular chain is negligible. 

The possibility to calculate hydrodynamic quantities (eg, [i ]) both with preaveraging Ozeeii s tensor and directly (without any preaveraging) proves to be a serious advantage of the calculational procedure of the renormalization group approximation. This allowed researchers to estimate the error of determination of the hydrodynamic quantities caus[Pg.744]

Different combinations of the expressions for hydrodynamic quantities with each other and with other characteristic quantities, formed according to the principle of reducing the arbitrary length L, leetd to hydrodynamic invariants which tally with the trciditioiial ones lip to a cxinstant. 

There are a variety of measurements which one can carry out to obtain several hydrodynamic quantities. The kinds of measurements which are commonly made, and the quantities which may be computed from the experimental data, are listed in Table I. The reader is referred elsewhere (Edsall, 1953) for a discussion of the details of these various experimental methods. Some of the relations between the measured and computed quantities will be considered later. 

In the hydrodynamic theories for any of the quantities in the last column of Table I, each quantity depends on two parameters, the size and the shape. For example, for an ellipsoid of revolution these two parameters could be the volume and axial ratio, F and p, respectively, of the effective hydrodynamic ellipsoid. Therefore, we may draw a first very important conclusion, viz., that a determination of only one quantity, e.g., /, cannot provide us with a value of Ve or p. It is clear that two quantities are required, e.g., f and [r ] if two such quantities are available, then both F, and p may be computed. Of course, if one has information in advance as to the value of F or p (e.g., if the particle behaves as a sphere, with p = 1), then a single hydrodynamic quantity suffices to give the value of the other parameter. Unfortunately, one never has this advance information and, therefore, must carry out two different kinds of hydrodynamic measurements in order to obtain a pair of hydrodynamic quantities. 

Recognizing that a pair of hydrodynamic quantities will be required in order to compute V, and p, we select as a first pair the intrinsic viscosity [)j], and the translational frictional coefficient, /. 

First of all it should be noted that, whereas v and 1/F, of Figs. 1 and 2, vary considerably with p, the quantity 0 is relatively insensitive to p. This insensitivity will arise from any combination of hydrodynamic quantities and simply represents one of the limitations of hydrodynamic measurements for determining a and b. Very precise values of the experimental quantities required in order to obtain a precise value of /3 to avoid large errors in p and V,. This insensitivity of the hydrodynamic method cannot be circumvented by arbitrarily fixing V, in order to take advantage of the... 

Secondly, if /3 2.12 X 10, the value of p is not determinable from /3. However, in such a case, other pairs of hydrodynamic quantities are available, and these are considered in the next two sections. 

Turning now to the question of the applicability of the foregoing hydro-dynamic theory to dilute solutions of proteins, let us first consider the quantity F,. As we have seen, it is one of the parameters which may be computed from a pair of hydrodynamic quantities. In the interpretation of hydrodynamic data it might be thought desirable to split V, into two additive terms, viz.,... 

In summary, a pair of hydrodynamic quantities is required in order to obtain the dimensions of the effective hydrodynamic ellipsoid. While the relationship between this ellipsoid and the actual particle is not clear yet, it seems safe to assume that there is an intimate connection between the two. Comparison of hydrodynamic data with those from light-scattering and other techniques may provide a clue as to how close this relationship is. These kinds of investigations have provided us with an idea of the compactness and shape of globular proteins in solution, and do provide us with a basis for setting up models for studying the internal configura-... 

In optofluidic transport we are typically concerned with the interaction of the flow field with the transported species and thus the hydrodynamic quantity of interest is typically the total flow force on the particle. This is described by the integral of the normal component of the total stress tensor, Tf, around the particle boundary given by. 

Fluid flows or any related hydrodynamic quantities in a packed bed may be analyzed at various levels each one leading to completely different observations. Both the discretization adopted in the lattice representation and the nature of a packed bed suggest us to consider the following fundamental levels... 

Most of the hydrodynamic quantities are extension properties so that the averaging formula reduces to ... 

---