Hybrids methodologies

Numerous attempts have been made to develop hybrid methodologies along these lines. An obvious advantage of the method is its handiness, while its disadvantage is an artifact introduced at the boundary between the solute and solvent. You may obtain agreement between experiments and theory as close as you desire by introducing many adjustable parameters associated with the boundary conditions. However, the more adjustable parameters are introduced, the more the physical significance of the parameter is obscured. 

The combination of this top-down proteomics approach, which generates information on the structure of the intact protein, with a bottom-up approach for protein identification (using MS/MS data of tryptic peptides from the collected fractions) has been particularly useful for identifying posttranslational modifications, cotransla-tional processing, and proteolytic modifications in a number of proteins. Examples from our work will be shown to illustrate this hybrid methodology for proteomics analysis. 

In summary, the resin-capture-release hybrid methodology will become one important instrument in this orchestra of techniques. 

Labeling of probes for in situ hybridization relies on the incorporation of either a radioisotopic dNTP (e.g., dCTP), or of a nonisotopic molecule, such as biotin-7-dAlT or biotin-11-dUTP, by either nick translation or random priming. The site (s) of hybridization can then be seen using autoradiography with isotopic probes, or immunocytochemically if biotin is incorporated into the probe DNA. It is with the latter form of in situ hybridization methodology that this chapter is concerned. 

The Onion Approach. - In addition to the usual hybrid methodology described above, Morokuma et al. have taken a slightly different onion approach to combining calculations at different levels of theory. In the... 

One of the most extended implementations within this approach is a hybrid methodology usually denoted as B3LYP after the three-parameter exchange-correlation functional developed by Becke [34] ... 

The method has not been used as a complete, freestanding methodological unit in Czech HRA studies. Of course, the basic new concepts defined and promoted by the method have been retrained into the hybrid methodology developed and used in NRI Rez in the field of HRA currently. 

For hybrid methodologies dealing with dynamical processes, the need to connect different computational models creates a second, very significant, problem Wave reflections may occur at the artificial boundary. Such a reflection arises because of the mismatch in wave spectra between the regions a classical atomistic region, for instance, emits waves that are significantly shorter than those that can be captured by a continuum finite-element (FE) region. 

The quasi-continuum (QC) method was first introduced in 1996 by Tadmor et al. for the investigation of deformation in solids. Ever since, this method has been one of the most powerful and widely applied hybrid methodologies. Its primary applications include the study of dislocation nucleation, cracks, interfaces, grain boundary structure and deformation, nanoindentation phenomena, and so on. Various applications are discussed in more detail below. Since its appearance, the model has been improved and expanded, " and these more complete versions are briefly presented here. If additional details are needed, several specialized reviews are available. 

Coupled Atomistic and Discrete Dislocation Method The coupled atomistic and discrete dislocation (CADD) method was developed by Shilkrot, Miller, Dewalt, and Curtin as a continuum/ atomistic hybrid methodology where defects (specifically dislocations) are allowed to move, can exist in both the atomistic and the continuum region, and, lastly, are permitted to cross the boundary between such domains. The methodology has later been expanded to model finite temperature as well. Similarly to the FEAt and CLS methods, CADD is based on a spatial separation of the physical problem into regions, which are modeled by either... 

In this section, we discuss hybrid methodologies that explore the dynamical evolution of systems composed of a continuum region (usually described using finite-element methods) coupled to a discrete one [modeled using molecular dynamics (MD) algorithms and semiempirical classical potentials]. 

As already emphasized, a major problem in all of the dynamical formulations of hybrid methodologies is the occurrence of spurious reflections when phonons cross the domain boundary. One possible approach to minimize/eliminate such an unphysical phenomenon is to fine-tune the boundary conditions (BC) used in the molecular dynamics simulation. A great number of boundary condition schemes of this kind have been developed, as in Refs. 177,178,185-188, and 209-221, just to mention some. It is beyond the scope of this review to discuss them in detail, but, borrowing from Yang and Li, we will briefly present the general idea behind some of the most commonly used schemes. 

Due to the sheer number, it is not possible to include in this review all of the proposed hybrid methodologies that deal with the coupling of continuum and atomistic regions in dynamical simulations. However, before leaving this section, we want to mention a few more types of methodologies. First, the multigrid methods,of which the recent work of Waisman and Fish is a good example. Also, the MPM/MD method, where the material point method (MPM) is used instead of the finite-element method (FEM) to couple continuum mechanics to conventional molecular dynamics. 

Over the course of several years, Ogata et al. developed a full-spectrum (i.e., FE/CM/QM) hybrid methodology for chemical and physical applica-As is the case for the LOTF method discussed in the preceding... 

---