Hopping conduction molecules

Attaching the catalyst molecules to the electrode surface presents an obvious advantage for synthetic and sensor applications. Catalysis can then be viewed as a supported molecular catalysis. It is the object of the next section. A distinction is made between monolayer and multilayer coatings. In the former, only chemical catalysis may take place, whereas both types of catalysis are possible with multilayer coatings, thanks to their three-dimensional structure. Besides substrate transport in the bathing solution, the catalytic responses are then under the control of three main phenomena electron hopping conduction, substrate diffusion, and catalytic reaction. While several systems have been described in which electron transport and catalysis are carried out by the same redox centers, particularly interesting systems are those in which these two functions are completed by two different molecular systems. 

The soliton conductivity model for rrans-(CH) was put forward by Kivelson [115]. It was shown that at low temperature phonon assisted electron hopping between soliton-bound states may be the dominant conduction process in a lightly doped one - dimensional Peierls system such as polyacetylene. The presence of disorder, as represented by a spatially random distribution of charged dopant molecules causes the hopping conduction pathway to be essentially three dimensional. At the photoexitation stage, mainly neutral solitons have to be formed. These solitons maintain the soliton bands. The transport processes have to be hopping ones with a highly expressed dispersive... 

Evidence that double-stranded DNA molecules are adsorbed in such a way that the helical axis becomes parallel to the electrode surface, the base-pairs being vertically oriented against the electrode surface [45] leads to the conclusion that the thickness of a monolayer of adsorbed DNA at the electrode surface is less than 2 nm. This fact has been applied to use DNA adsorbed at a glassy carbon electrode as an effective electron promoter enabling electron transfer via hopping conduction through electrode-/base-pair/cytochrome c [91]. 

The hopping conductivity scheme above represents formally the data for in situ STM imaging and up to a point single-molecule conductivity of DNA-based molecules as observed. The issues of the energetics and the nature of the charge (electron or hope) transmitting states are, however, left open. 

Both the lack of a sharp definable mobility and threshold voltage are attributable to a gradual density of states profile at the valence or conduction band (HOMO/LUMO) frontiers of the material. Because carriers are relatively localized and hop from molecule to molecule, a continuum of states means that there is a distribution of energy barriers to conduction. As the Fermi level of the semiconductor moves closer to a higher density of states, states closer to the edge (which appear more mobile) are populated, and the incrementally added new carriers are significantly more mobile than deeper charges which were added earlier [127]. 

In contrast to ultrapure crystals, the charge carriers in disordered molecular solids are localised on the molecules and for transport, they must be thermally activated in order to hop from molecule to molecule. Therefore, in the disordered molecular solids, the mobility becomes greater with increasing temperature. The process of electrical conductivity is then termed hopping conductivity (cf. Sect. 8.6). 

Protons can propagate by two mechanisms. One is by the viscous flow of a complex H+(H20) where n = 1, 2, 3, 4, the second is by the Grotthuss mechanism, hopping of a proton from one hydronium H3O+ to a nearby water molecule. The latter mechanism has some similarity to hopping conduction of ions in solids as discussed in the following text. 

Figure 2.4 Proton Hopping Conductance—Same Molecules at Three Different Moments, (a) Water molecule rotation, (b) hopping, and (c) new proton position.

The possibility of utilizing polymer-nanocomposites for the manufacture of gas and vapor sensors was studied in our laboratory in 1992 [40]. The specificity of nanocomposites, which makes them attractive as a gas sensor material, is the existence of a hopping conductivity between the nanoparticles through the polymer in a range of concentrations close to the percolation threshold (see Sect. 2.3). Since the absorption and partial dissolution of the gas or vapor molecules in polymer matrix changes its properties, it is possible to monitor these changes measuring electrophysical characteristics of the composites such as conductance and capacitance. The important point here... 

The influence of polymer matrix on the behavior nanocomposite system was the drastic increase of composite conductivity caused by absorption of water vapors by polymer matrix. The value of such a change has the sharp extremum corresponding to the range where hopping conduction dominates the system electroconductivity> It was assumed that the influence is primarily realized through the dependence of hopping conductivity (see Eq. (25)) on dielectric constant of polymer matrix, which is drastically changed when absorption of such polar molecules as HjO takes place. The simple theoretical model has been developed (mean field approximation) ... 

As for the chemical structure of molecules, it has been shown by experiment and by theory, that the dipole moment of a molecule dominates the extent of distribution in the density of localized states associated with hopping conduction for amorphous aggregates and so the mobility seriously depends on the dipole moment of the molecule [66]. For meosphases, however, any clear relation between the chemical structure of the molecular core and the mobility in a mesophase has not yet been clarified in either discotic or calamitic liquid crystals. This omission is because the data for the mobility in various liquid crystals is still too... 

As with conductivity measurements, methods and results of theoretical treatments of CT in DNA have varied significantly. Mechanisms invoking hopping, tunneling, superexchange, or even band delocalization have been proposed to explain CT processes in DNA (please refer to other reviews in this text). Significantly, many calculations predicted that the distance dependence of CT in DNA should be comparable to that observed in the a-systems of proteins [26]. This prediction has not been realized experimentally. The dichotomy between theory and experiment may be related to the fact that many early studies gave insufficient consideration to the unique properties of the DNA molecule. Consequently, CT models derived for typical conductors, or even those based on other biomolecules such as proteins, were not adequate for DNA. 

---