Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Hinshelwood-Hougen-Watson Kinetics

Butt and Petersen (1988) extended the Langmuir—Hinshelwood—Hougen—Watson kinetics to involve the varying activity (as a result of catalyst deactivation with time) to describe... [Pg.519]

The results can be interpreted in terms of Langmuir-Hinshelwood-Hougen-Watson kinetics. Styrene adsorbs more strongly than octenes and, as a consequence, only after styrene has been converted does the formation of octanes proceed at a high rate. The... [Pg.253]

Exemplary results of modeling processes inside the catalytic layer are presented in Fig. 9. The solid lines show the dependency of the overall effectiveness factor on the relative distribution of the catalyst between the comers and the side regions. The two cases represent two levels of the first-order rate constants, with the faster reaction in case (b). As expected, the effectiveness factor of the first reaction drops as more catalyst is deposited in the comers. The effectiveness factor for the second reaction increases in case (a) but decreases in case (b). The latter behavior is caused by depletion of B deep inside the catalytic layer. What might be surprising is the rather modest dependency of the effectiveness factor on the washcoat distribution. The explanation is that internal diffusion is not important for slow reactions, while for fast reactions the available external surface area becomes the key quantity, and this depends only slightly on the washcoat distribution for thin layers. The dependence of the effectiveness factor on the distribution becomes more pronounced for consecutive reactions described by Langmuir-Hinshelwood-Hougen-Watson kinetics [26]. [Pg.279]

Skrzypek el al. mode (19H5) Skrzypek el al. (1985) developed this model based on the Langmuir-Hinshelwood-Hougen-Watson kinetic model to explain the non-monotonic behaviour observed by Calder-bank (1974). They suggested that the reaction rate behaviour can be related to the Langmuir-Hinshelwood kinetic model for bimolecular reactions, where the surface reaction between o-Xylene and oxygen chemisorbed on the active centers is the rate determining step. The rate of appearance of various components can be written as ... [Pg.68]

Reversible reaction with Langmuir-Hinshelwood-Hougen-Watson kinetics... [Pg.53]

The problem posed by Eq. (6.22), without the additional complication of the O dependence, is a classical problem in heterogeneous catalysis. The usual approach it to use Langmuir isotherms to describe reactant (and sometimes product) adsorption. This leads to the well known Langmuir-Hinshelwood-Hougen-Watson (LHHW) kinetics.3 The advantage of this approach is... [Pg.305]

Langmuir-Hinshelwood-Hougen-Watson (LHHW) kinetics, 21 Nernst, 95... [Pg.569]

Examples of Hougen-Watson kinetic models, which are also called Langmuir-Hinshelwood models, can be derived for a great variety of assumed surface mechanisms. See Butt and Perry s Handbook (see Suggestions for Further reading in Chapter 5) for collections of the many possible models. The models usually have numerators that are the same as would be expected for a homogeneous reaction. The denominators reveal the heterogeneous nature of the reactions. They come in almost endless varieties, but all reflect competition for the catalytic sites by the adsorbable species. [Pg.361]

In general, the use of Langmuir-Hinshelwood-Hougen-Watson (LHHW)-type of rate equation for representing the hydrogenation kinetics of industrial feedstocks is complicated, and there are too many coefficients that are difficult to determine. Therefore, simple power law models have been used by most researchers to fit kinetic data and to obtain kinetic parameters. [Pg.441]

Herzfeld and Langmuir-Hinshelwood-Hougen-Watson cycles, could be formulated and solved in terms of analytical rate expressions (19,53). These rate expressions, which were derived from mechanistic cycles, are phrased, however, in terms of the formation and destruction of molecular species without the need for computing the composition of reactive intermediates. Thus, these expressions are the relevant kinetics required for molecular models and are rooted to the mechanistic cycles only implicitly by the mechanistic rate constants. The molecular model, in turn, transforms a vector of reactant molecules into a vector of product molecules, either of which is susceptible to thermodynamic analysis. This thermodynamic analysis helps to organize these components into relevant boiling point or solubility product classes. Thus the sequence of mechanistic to molecular to global models is intact. [Pg.311]

In heterogeneous catalysis these models are generally referred to as the Langmuir-Hinshelwood-Hougen-Watson (LHHW) models. The term Michaelis-Menten kinetics is often used in homogeneous catalysis, enzyme reactions and reactions of microbial systems. [Pg.77]

For a reaction of such complexity as methanation (or FTS) an exact kinetic theory is actually out of the question. One has to introduce one or more approximations. The usual assumption made is that one reaction step is rate determining (r.d.s.) and other steps are in equilibrium or steady state. Adsorption equilibria are described by Langmuir formulas (Langmuir-Hinshelwood, Hougen-Watson... [Pg.162]

Recently a rigorous quantitative model was developed in order to describe promotional and, more generally, catalytic kinetics [130,147]. The model can be viewed as an extension of classical Langmuir-Hinshelwood-Hougen-Watson (LHHW) kinetics. [Pg.735]

There are currently two available different ways in which one might use the predicted kinetic information on elementary reaction steps 1) the conventional Langmuir-Hinshelwood-Hougen-Watson (LHHW) approach [3], in which an explicit rate expression might be derived based on the common, but rather arbitrary. [Pg.31]

The feed stream is stoichiometric in terms of the two reactants. Diatomic A2 undergoes dissociative adsorption. Components B, C, and D experience single-site adsorption, and triple-site chemical reaction on the catalytic surface is the rate-controlling feature of the overall irreversible process. This Langmuir-Hinshelwood mechanism produces the following Hougen-Watson kinetic model for the rate of reaction with units of moles per area per time ... [Pg.456]

Two-dimensional diffusion occurs axially and radially in cylindrically shaped porous catalysts when the length-to-diameter ratio is 2. Reactant A is consumed on the interior catalytic surface by a Langmuir-Hinshelwood mechanism that is described by a Hougen-Watson kinetic model, similar to the one illustrated by equation (15-26). This rate law is linearized via equation (15-30) and the corresponding simulationpresented in Figure 15-1. Describe the nature of the differential equation (i.e., the mass transfer model) that must be solved to calculate the reactant molar density profile inside the catalyst. [Pg.480]

The most important characteristic of this problem is that the Hougen-Watson kinetic model contains molar densities of more than one reactive species. A similar problem arises if 5 mPappl Hw = 2CaCb because it is necessary to relate the molar densities of reactants A and B via stoichiometry and the mass balance with diffusion and chemical reaction. When adsorption terms appear in the denominator of the rate law, one must use stoichiometry and the mass balance to relate molar densities of reactants and products to the molar density of key reactant A. The actual form of the Hougen-Watson model depends on details of the Langmuir-Hinshelwood-type mechanism and the rate-limiting step. For example, consider the following mechanism ... [Pg.491]


See other pages where Hinshelwood-Hougen-Watson Kinetics is mentioned: [Pg.441]    [Pg.132]    [Pg.83]    [Pg.83]    [Pg.283]    [Pg.344]    [Pg.132]    [Pg.390]    [Pg.441]    [Pg.132]    [Pg.83]    [Pg.83]    [Pg.283]    [Pg.344]    [Pg.132]    [Pg.390]    [Pg.21]    [Pg.37]    [Pg.48]    [Pg.192]    [Pg.292]    [Pg.346]    [Pg.361]    [Pg.311]    [Pg.85]    [Pg.274]    [Pg.57]    [Pg.220]   


SEARCH



Hinshelwood

Hougen

Hougen-Watson kinetics

Langmuir-Hinshelwood-Hougen-Watson kinetics

Langmuir—Hinshelwood—Hougen—Watson kinetic equation

Watson

© 2024 chempedia.info