Hilbert infinite

This analysis is heuristic in the sense that the Hilbert spaces in question are in general of large, if not infinite, dimension while we have focused on spaces of dimension four or two. A form of degenerate perturbation theory [3] can be used to demonstrate that the preceding analysis is essentially correct and, to provide the means for locating and characterizing conical intersections. 

Next, the full-Hilbert space is broken up into two parts—a finite part, designated as the P space, with dimension M, and the complementai y part, the Q space (which is allowed to he of an infinite dimension). The breakup is done according to the following criteria [8-10] ... 

In Section IV.A, the adiabatic-to-diabatic transformation matrix as well as the diabatic potentials were derived for the relevant sub-space without running into theoretical conflicts. In other words, the conditions in Eqs. (10) led to a.finite sub-Hilbert space which, for all practical purposes, behaves like a full (infinite) Hilbert space. However it is inconceivable that such strict conditions as presented in Eq. (10) are fulfilled for real molecular systems. Thus the question is to what extent the results of the present approach, namely, the adiabatic-to-diabatic transformation matrix, the curl equation, and first and foremost, the diabatic potentials, are affected if the conditions in Eq. (10) are replaced by more realistic ones This subject will be treated next. 

This concludes our derivation regarding the adiabatic-to-diabatic tiansforma-tion matrix for a finite N. The same applies for an infinite Hilbert space (but finite M) if the coupling to the higher -states decays fast enough. 

By following Section II.B, we shall be more specific about what is meant by strong and weak interactions. It turns out that such a criterion can be assumed, based on whether two consecutive states do, or do not, form a conical intersection or a parabolical intersection (it is important to mention that only consecutive states can form these intersections). The two types of intersections are characterized by the fact that the nonadiabatic coupling terms, at the points of the intersection, become infinite (these points can be considered as the black holes in molecular systems and it is mainly through these black holes that electronic states interact with each other.). Based on what was said so far we suggest breaking up complete Hilbert space of size A into L sub-Hilbert spaces of varying sizes Np,P = 1,..., L where... 

Before we continue with the construction of the sub-Hilbert spaces, we make the following comment Usually, when two given states fomr conical intersections, one thinks of isolated points in configuration space. In fact, conical intersections are not points but form (finite or infinite) seams that cut through the molecular configuration space. However, since our studies are carried out for planes, these planes usually contain isolated conical intersection points only. 

Consider a deteriiiinistic local reversible CA i.o. start with an infinite array of sites, T, arranged in some regular fashion, and a.ssume each site can be any of N states labeled by 0 < cr x) < N. If the number of sites is Af, the Hilbert space spanned by the states <7-(x is N- dimensional. The state at time t + 1, cTf+i(a ) depends only on the values cri x ) that are in the immediate neighborhood of X. Because the cellular automata is reversible, the mapping ai x) crt+i x ) is assumed to have a unique inveuse and the evolution operator U t,t + 1) in this Hilbert space is unitary,... 

The second axiom, which is reminiscent of Mach s principle, also contains the seeds of Leibniz s Monads [reschQl]. All is process. That is to say, there is no thing in the universe. Things, objects, entities, are abstractions of what is relatively constant from a process of movement and transformation. They are like the shapes that children like to see in the clouds. The Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen correlations (see section 12.7.1) remind us that what we empirically accept as fundamental particles - electrons, atoms, molecules, etc. - actually never exist in total isolation. Moreover, recalling von Neumann s uniqueness theorem for canonical commutation relations (which asserts that for locally compact phase spaces all Hilbert-space representations of the canonical commutation relations are physically equivalent), we note that for systems with non-locally-compact phase spaces, the uniqueness theorem fails, and therefore there must be infinitely many physically inequivalent and... 

Another of the postulates defining Hilbert space is that JF constitutes an infinite-dimensional manifold. In other words, there must exist in a denumerably infinite sequence of independent vectors /i>, /2>, such that... 

It will be noticed that continuous basis sets, with improper Dirao delta functions as scalar products, do not strictly belong to Hilbert space as defined in Section 8.3, where the basis is specifically required by postulate to be denumerably infinite. The nondenumerably infinite sets g> or j actually span what is known as Banach spaces,5 but we shall here conform to the custom among theoretical physicists to oall them Hilbert spaces. 

A final example is the concept of QM state. It is often stated that the wave function must be square integrable because the modulus square of the wave function is a probability distribution. States in QM are rays in Hilbert space, which are equivalence classes of wave functions. The equivalence relation between two wave functions is that one wave function is equal to the other multiplied by a complex number. The space of QM states is then a projective space, which by an infinite stereographic projection is isomorphic to a sphere in Hilbert space with any radius, conventionally chosen as one. Hence states can be identified with normalized wave functions as representatives from each equivalence class. This fact is important for the probability interpretation, but it is not a consequence of the probability interpretation. 

A set of complete orthonormal functions ipfx) of a single variable x may be regarded as the basis vectors of a linear vector space of either finite or infinite dimensions, depending on whether the complete set contains a finite or infinite number of members. The situation is analogous to three-dimensional cartesian space formed by three orthogonal unit vectors. In quantum mechanics we usually (see Section 7.2 for an exception) encounter complete sets with an infinite number of members and, therefore, are usually concerned with linear vector spaces of infinite dimensionality. Such a linear vector space is called a Hilbert space. The functions ffx) used as the basis vectors may constitute a discrete set or a continuous set. While a vector space composed of a discrete set of basis vectors is easier to visualize (even if the space is of infinite dimensionality) than one composed of a continuous set, there is no mathematical reason to exclude continuous basis vectors from the concept of Hilbert space. In Dirac notation, the basis vectors in Hilbert space are called ket vectors or just kets and are represented by the symbol tpi) or sometimes simply by /). These ket vectors determine a ket space. 

It applies for both formulations above that the expansion in principle contains an infinite number of terms. The convergence to a few lowest order terms relies on the ability to orderly separate influences of the dominant rf irradiation terms (through a suitable interaction frame) from the less dominant internal terms of the Hamiltonian. In principle, this may be overcome using the spectral theorem (or the Caley-Hamilton theorem [57]) providing a closed (i.e., exact) solution to the Baker-Campbell-Hausdorf problem with all dependencies included in n terms where n designates the dimension of the Hilbert-space matrix representation (e.g., 2 for a single spin-1/2, 4 for a two-spin-1/2 system) [58, 59]. 

In an n-dimensional Hilbert space, Ln the set of n independent vectors define a complete set in Ln. This set is called a basis, and the vectors are called the basis vectors. Basis vectors can be chosen in an infinite number... 

In this section the symbols orthonormal basis functions of a Hilbert space L, which may be finite or infinite, and x stands for the variables on which the functions of L may depend. An operator defined on L has the action Tf(x) = g(x) where g L. The action of T on a basis function 4>n x) is described by... 

In Fig. 7, we present a general scheme, comprising the intra- and inter-orbit optimizations appearing in the variational problem described by Eq. (138). We discuss this optimization process with reference to only three of the infinite number of orbits into which Hilbert space is decomposed. These orbits are... 

Remark. Apart from the question whether the set of all eigenfunctions is complete, one is in practice often faced with the following problem. Suppose for a certain operator W one has been able to determine a set of solutions of (7.1). Are they all solutions For a finite matrix W this question can be answered by counting the number of linearly independent vectors one has found. For some problems with a Hilbert space of infinite dimensions it is possible to show directly that the solutions are a complete set, see, e.g., VI.8. Ordinarily one assumes that any reasonably systematic method for calculating the eigenfunctions will give all of them, but some problems have one or more unsuspected exceptional eigenfunctions. 

The eigenvalue problem of the Hamiltonian operator (1) is defined in an infinite-dimensional Hilbert space Q and may be solved directly only for very few simple models. In order to find its bound-state solutions with energies not too distant from the ground-state it is reduced to the corresponding eigenvalue problem of a matrix representing H in a properly constructed finite-dimensional model space, a subspace of Q. Usually the model space is chosen to be spanned by TV-electron antisymmetrized and spin-adapted products of orthonormal spinorbitals. In such a case it is known as the full configuration interaction (FCI) space [8, 15]. The model space Hk N, K, S, M) may be defined as the antisymmetric part of the TV-fold tensorial product of a one-electron space... 

This is a moment of maximal difficulty to grasp. The material system that sustains the quantum state must be the same as the one detected at the end if the experiment is so designed. In between, it is the quantum state that describes the whereabouts of the system not as a localized material one but as presence at Fence space. It is here where one has to calculate quantum states for quantum measurements. Being infinite in number, they cover all possible behaviors. What is decisive is the presence of a Hilbert space that forces first calculations based on quantum states and at last, the laboratory requirement would impose, at the recording apparatus, the presence of the material system. 

It is the presence of the uncertainty products that would state us that an interaction took place between the incoming quantum state and the quantum states from the slit (not explicitly incorporated) in Hilbert space leads to a scattered state combining both, one can easily understand the emergence of diffraction effects. It is not the particle model that will indicate us this result. The scattered quantum state suggests all (infinite) possibilities the quantum system has at disposal. One particle will only be associated with one event at best yet, the time structure of a set of these events may be the physically significant element (see Section 4.1). 

There are two realizations of the abstract Hilbert space which are frequently used in physics the sequential Hilbert space J( 0, and the L2 Hilbert space. The sequential Hilbert space Jf0 consists of all infinite column vectors c = ct with complex elements having a finite norm c, so that... 

The result shows that the dc-conductivity can be computed by using the Hilbert transform applied to the real components of the dielectric permittivity function and subtracting the result from its imaginary components. The main obstacle to the practical application of the Hilbert transform is that the integration in Eq. (48) is performed over infinite limits however, a DS spectroscopy measurement provides values of s (co) only over some finite frequency range. Truncation of the integration in the computation of the Hilbert... 

The operator serves to extract information from the state vectors and may correspond to any physical observable such as position, momentum, angular momentum (spin or orbital) or energy. The state vector itself is not observable. In most systems the number of eigenfunctions is infinite and it is an axiom of quantum mechanics that the set of all eigenfunctions of a Hermitian operator forms a complete set. These eigenfunctions define a Hilbert space on which the operator acts. 

The boundary conditions are periodic and the number of allowed values of the wave vector k is equal to the number of unit cells in the crystal. These eigenfunctions constitute the basis for the infinite-dimensional Hilbert space of the crystal Hamiltonian and any function with the same boundary conditions can be expressed as a linear combination of functions in this complete set. 

The distance between two electrons at a given site is given as ri2. The electron wave function for one of the electrons is given as (p(ri) and the wave function for the second electron, with antiparallel spin, is Hubbard intra-atomic energy and it is not accounted for in conventional band theory, in which the independent electron approximation is invoked. Finally, it should also be noted that the Coulomb repulsion interaction had been introduced earlier in the Anderson model describing a magnetic impurity coupled to a conduction band (Anderson, 1961). In fact, it has been shown that the Hubbard Hamiltonian reduces to the Anderson model in the limit of infinite-dimensional (Hilbert) space (Izyumov, 1995). Hence, Eq. 7.3 is sometimes referred to as the Anderson-Hubbard repulsion term. 

Let/i and/2 be two properties of the species in the system (there may be concentrations, vapor pressures, etc.). If the number of species is finite, one has two vectors fj and f2 in a finite-dimensional vector space (the number of dimensions being the number of species). The inner product is generalized to the inner product in the Hilbert space for two infinite-dimensional vectors fiix),f2(x) as follows (y is the label x when intended as a dummy variable we assume that X has been normalized so as to be dimensionless, see later discussion) ... 

Of course, curly braces will also identify an inner product and a norm in the infinitedimensional Hilbert space of reactions. While the latter is infinite dimensional just the same as the space of components, one should be careful in generalizing results from finite-dimensional vector spaces, as the discussion in the following shows for some simple problems. 

The mathematics taught to researchers in science is almost exclusively focused on the Hilbert theory of infinite matrices an object such as a continued fraction may thus be unfamiliar to them. Historically mathematical discoveries have followed a different pattern. The analytic theory of continued fractions of Stieltjes inspired and preceded by almost a decade the pioneering work of Hilbert and his school. The development of quantum mechanics in the early part of this century has granted to the latter a leading role. ... 

In this appendix we generalise the expressions of the diabatic quantities first introduced in Sec. 2 for the ideal case of an exact two-level problem to a more realistic description. In a normal situation, the Hamiltonian has an infinite number of eigenstates, and there is no finite number of strictly diabatic states [76] that can describe a given pair of adiabatic states [77-80]. Instead, one can define a unitary transformation of the adiabatic states generating two quasidiabatic states characterised by a residual non-adiabatic coupling, as small as possible, but never zero (see, e.g., [5,24,32-35]). In practice, the electronic Hilbert space is always truncated to a finite number of configurations. In what follows, we consider the case of MCSCF wavefunctions and make use of generalised crude adiabatic states adapted to this. 

Although in the semiclassical model the only dynamical variables are those of the molecule, and the extended Hilbert space. if = M M and the Floquet Hamiltonian K can be thought as only mathematically convenient techniques to analyze the dynamics, it was clear from the first work of Shirley [1] that the enlarged Hilbert space should be related to photons. This relation was made explicit by Bialynicki-Birula and co-workers [7,8] and completed in [9]. The construction starts with a quantized photon field in a cavity of finite volume in interaction with the molecule. The limit of infinite volume with constant photon density leads to the Floquet Hamiltonian, which describes the interaction of the molecule with a quantized laser field propagating in free space. The construction presented below is taken from Ref. 9, where further details and mathematical precisions can be found. 

---