Helix model of DNA

Although the chemical nature of single-stranded DNA was well known by 1950, it was Watson and Crick who finally solved the structure of double-stranded DNA in 1953 and proposed a double helix model of DNA based on x-ray diffraction data [2], This concept eventually earned them a Nobel prize in 1962. They proposed that DNA consists of two independent strands, each having alternate pentose sugar (deoxyribose) and phosphate units linked via ester linkage (phosphodiester) as part of their backbone... 

Fig. 6.6. Schematic representation of the Watson and Crick double helix model of DNA. The radius of the double helix is 10 A, the vertical rise per base pair is 3.4 A, and one complete turn of the double helix traverses 10 base pairs of 34 A.

These genetic experiments clearly demonstrated that the proposed structural model for the binding of these proteins to the phage operators was essentially correct. The second a helix in the helix-turn-helix motif is involved in recognizing operator sites as well as in the differential selection of operators by P22 Cro and repressor proteins. However, a note of caution is needed many other early models of DNA-protein interactions proved to be misleading, if not wrong. Modeling techniques are more sophisticated today but are still not infallible and are certainly not replacements for experimental determinations of structure. 

A -DNA The Watson-Crick model of DNA is based on the x-ray diffraction patterns of B-DNA. Most DNA is B-DNA however, DNA may take on two other conformations, A-DNA and Z-DNA. These conformations are greatly favored by the base sequence or by bound proteins. When B-DNA is slightly dehydrated in the laboratory, it takes on the A conformation. A-DNA is very similar to B-DNA except that the base pairs are not stacked perpendicular to the helix axis rather, they are tilted because the deoxyribose moiety puckers differently. An A-DNA helix is wider and shorter than the B-DNA helix. 

The nucleic acids are among the most complex molecules that you will encounter in your biochemical studies. When the dynamic role that is played by DNA in the life of a cell is realized, the complexity is understandable. It is difficult to comprehend all the structural characteristics that are inherent in the DNA molecules, but most biochemistry students are familiar with the double-helix model of Watson and Crick. The discovery of the double-helical structure of DNA is one of the most significant breakthroughs in our understanding of the chemistry of life. This experiment will introduce you to the basic structural characteristics of the DNA molecule and to the forces that help establish the complementary interactions between the two polynucleotide strands. 

The double-helical model of DNA and the presence of specific base pairs immediately suggested how the genetic material might replicate. The sequence of bases of one strand of the double helix precisely determines the sequence of the other strand a guanine base on one strand is always paired with a cytosine base on the other strand, and so on. Thus, separation of a double helix into its two component chains would yield two single-stranded templates onto which new double helices could be constructed, each of which would have the same sequence of bases as the parent double helix. Consequently, as DNA is replicated, one of the chains of each daughter DNA molecule would be newly synthesized, whereas the other would be passed unchanged from the parent DNA molecule. This distribution of parental atoms is achieved by semiconservative replication.. 

This statement has a remarkable precedent in the history of the discovery of the DNA double helix Jim Watson and Francis Crick s efforts to build a model of DNA remained futile as long as Jerry Donohue had not told them that they were using the wrong tautomers for the nudeobases (Watson, 1968). 

Figure 8.4.1 (a) Schematic model of DNA replication. The DNA double helix is partially... 

The two strands of DNA run in opposite directions (Fig. 3-38). A model of DNA that incorporates base pairing between complementary strands and that is consistent with X-ray diffraction data was developed by James Watson and Frances Crick in 1953. In this model, the two strands twist aroimd each other to give a right-handed double-stranded helix. To achieve a stmcture that was consistent with the stmctural data available at the time, it was necessary to orientate the complementary chains in opposite directions. Direct proof of this opposite polarity in chain direction was achieved 10 years later. 

With this Planning for the Future example set forth, this chapter will focus on describing the three competency-based outcomes categorized from the data presented in Chapter 2. Each competency, systems, sustainability and ethics, is defined based on recent theories, contextualized based on recent research, and finally synthesized based on assessment rubrics. This is done to address the above Statement of the Problem, Paradigms and pedagogy regarding the need for competency mastery in mechanical engineering education need to be created and/or enriched so that the DNA double helix model of content and competency development can be enacted widely. With that Statement of the Problem in mind, the first competency, systems competency, is presented next. 

The meaning of these equivalences was not evident until 1953, when Watson and Grick, working together in Gambridge, England, proposed the double helix model for DNA. They received simultaneous supporting x-ray data for their proposal from Rosalind Franklin and Maurice Wilkins in London. The important features of their model follow ... 

---