Heat, theories chemical theory

Enthalpies are referred to the ideal vapor. The enthalpy of the real vapor is found from zero-pressure heat capacities and from the virial equation of state for non-associated species or, for vapors containing highly dimerized vapors (e.g. organic acids), from the chemical theory of vapor imperfections, as discussed in Chapter 3. For pure components, liquid-phase enthalpies (relative to the ideal vapor) are found from differentiation of the zero-pressure standard-state fugacities these, in turn, are determined from vapor-pressure data, from vapor-phase corrections and liquid-phase densities. If good experimental data are used to determine the standard-state fugacity, the derivative gives enthalpies of liquids to nearly the same precision as that obtained with calorimetric data, and provides reliable heats of vaporization. 

Coating Theory. This theory includes fire retardants which form an impervious skin on the fiber surface. This coating may be formed during normal chemical finishing, or subsequently when the fire retardant and substrate are heated. It excludes the air necessary for flame propagation and traps any tarry volatiles produced during pyrolysis of the substrate. Examples of this type of agent include the easily fusible salts such as carbonates or borates. 

Lavoisier summarized his ideas developed over the previous twenty years in his seminal 1789 book Traite Elementaire de Chimie (Elements of Chemistry). This work presented his findings on gases and the role of heat in chemical reactions. He explained his oxygen theory and how this theory was superior to phlogiston theory. Lavoisier established the concept of a chemical element as a substance that could not be broken down by chemical means or made from other chemicals. Lavoisier also presented a table of thirty-three elements. The thirty-three elements mistakenly included light and caloric (heat). Lavoisier put forth the modern concept of a chemical reaction, the importance of quantitative measurement, and the principle of conservation of mass. The final part of Lavoisier s book presented chemical methods, a sort of cookbook for performing experiments. 

That some form of the meteoric theory is certainly the true and complete explanation of solar heat can scarcely be doubted, when the following reasons are considered (1) No other natural explanation, except by chemical action, can be conceived. (2) The chemical theory is quite insufficient, because the most energetic chemical action we know, taking place between substances amounting to the whole sun s mass, would only generate about 3,000 years heat. (3) There is no difficulty in accounting for 20,000,000 years heat by the meteoric theory.10... 

PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY. Application of the concepts and laws of physics to chemical phenomena in order to describe in quantitative (mathematical) terms a vast amount of empirical (observational) information. A selection of only the most important concepts of physical chemistiy would include the electron wave equation and the quantum mechanical interpretation of atomic and molecular structure, the study of the subatomic fundamental particles of matter. Application of thermodynamics to heats of formation of compounds and the heats of chemical reaction, the theory of rate processes and chemical equilibria, orbital theory and chemical bonding. surface chemistry (including catalysis and finely divided particles) die principles of electrochemistry and ionization. Although physical chemistry is closely related to both inorganic and organic chemistry, it is considered a separate discipline. See also Inorganic Chemistry and Organic Chemistry. 

Heat and fire were chemistry s most powerful tools. We saw in Chapter 3 how for Stahl, heat was an instrument and fire a principle or substance. As the eighteenth century progressed, Rouelle s more complex view—in which heat could be here an instrument, there a principle, and sometimes both at once— began to transform chemistry and to bring the science of heat and the phlogiston theory to the forefront of chemical debate. Chemical theory underwent radical change, not for the first time and not without keeping one foot in its past, and chemical apparatus also were altered. 

These contrasting historical interpretations of Black mirror the different ways in which his disciples developed the chemistry of heat, and of latent heat in particular. Thus William Irvine s non-chemical theory of latent heat did indeed take Black s ideas into a form readily assimilable to the early nineteenth-century transformation of heat into a physical instrument of chemical change. In drawing lines from Black to proto-thermodynamic thinking, Irvinism was the conduit. This is true, I think, even though, as Robert Fox long ago showed, Irvinist conceptions of heat were under apparently fatal attack from French investigators... 

Joseph Black subscribed to a version of the first material theory. He considered heat to be a special form of matter that combined with ordinary matter as a result of chemical forces of attraction. The phenomenon of cold produced by evaporation was explained by Black as follows. The cold experienced when water evaporates is the result of the water absorbing sensible heat as the water becomes vapour. The heat is not lost, rather the heat combines chemically with the vapour and it is this that gives the vapour the property of elasticity. Thus water absorbs the matter of heat, which becomes latent (or fixed as Black termed it initially) because it is now chemically combined with the water. Through this combination, the latent heat confers the property of fluidity or elasticity upon the vapour, that is upon the steam. 

What we can say for certain is that Watt owed a great deal to Black for his initiation into the science of chemistry. Watt took further than his master the commitment to a chemical theory of heat and the working out of its consequences. Watt took more seriously than his master the task of deciding what was useful in the new French chemistry and what had to be resisted. His conception of heat-content as a key differentiator between different chemical substances, such as different kinds of airs, grew out of these early experiences. So too, did the link in his mind between the chemistry of steam and the chemistry of airs, the idea of the essential unity of the chemistry of elastic fluids. 

Hutton s theory of heat was very important to his theory of the Earth but was given little prominence in the accounts of Hutton s theory developed by his followers, notably John Playfair and Sir James Hall,24 who reinterpreted and reshaped it. For them the chemical theory of heat was an excisable irrelevance, a diversion from the centrally important features of Hutton s theory of the Earth.25... 

Hutton used the ideas of latent and specific heats, which were respectively the principles of fluidity and volume, as parts of the repulsive force or what he called the solar substance . Together with light and electricity, specific heat and volume made up the repulsive force. Hutton explained the dynamics of natural cycles of rock formations largely in these terms within his theory, and so Hutton s theory of the Earth was given its dynamics by the chemical theory of heat. 

James Hutton, Joseph Black and the Chemical Theory of Heat , Ambix, 25 (1978), pp. 176-90. 

Now, when a solid chemical of the TD type is placed in the atmosphere maintained at a temperature below T, which is shown in Fig. 2 in Section 1.2, a spatially gradient distribution of temperature is effected in the solid chemical. However, the temperature as a whole does not vary with time in other words, the spatially gradient distribution of temperature effected in the self-heating solid chemical placed in the atmosphere maintained at a temperature below T is stationary. The stationary equation of the thermal explosion theory, Eq. (22), is thus obtained by considering the value of the derivative with regard to the time to be zero in Eq. (20). This approach is called the stationary theory of the thermal explosion [7]. ... 

In the thermal conduction theory, such a distribution in general is thought to be caused on condition that the rate of thermal conduction in the self-heating solid chemical placed in the atmosphere under isothermal conditions is far less than the rate of heat transfer from the solid chemical through the whole surface to the atmosphere. In other words, this condition is expressed as [/> > A, which is equivalent to that the Biot number takes a large value. 

Correlation among the pattern of the TG-DTA curve of a self-heating powdery chemical, the two types of self-heating behaviors, Le., the TD type and the quasi-AC type, and the two equations of the thermal explosion theory... 

---