Vickers pyramid hardness testing

Other common hardness tests involve the use of diamond pyramids. In the Vickers hardness test, a square pyramid is used and in the Knoop hardness test, the pyramid is elongated. The area term in the former test is the actual indentation area and in the latter, the projected area. From the impression geometries, shown in Fig. 6.30, the Vickers Hardness Number (VHN) and Knoop Hardness Number (KHN) can be shown to be VHN=1.854F/a and KHN=14.2F/L, respectively. A common hardness test in the USA is the RockweO hardness test, which uses various indenter types and loads. The result of these tests is a dimensionless number and leads to the use of various hardness scales (e.g., Rockwell B, Rockwell C). 

Vickers Hardness. The Vickers or diamond pyramid hardness (DPH) developed in 1924 was an improvement over the Brinell test. The Vickers test used a pyramidal diamond as the indenter. This permitted the hardness testing of much harder materials, and the constant 136° angle of the indenter eliminated the problem of variable indentation shape encountered using spherical indenters (1). 

The Vickers hardness test, developed in the United Kingdom, is more popular there than in the United States. VHN (Vickers hardness number) and DPH (diamond pyramid hardness) are synonymous terms. 

Hardness is determined by measuring the penetration (depth or area) when a harder material, such as diamond, is pushed into the surface of the material of interest under a specified load. Tme hardness is defined as the force divided by the projected area. Vickers hardness tests, which employ a pyramid-shaped indentor, are frequently used to characterize ceramics however, Vickers hardness calculations normally employ total surface area rather than projected area (43). Measurements are made on the diamond impression shown in Figure 6. Vickers hardness is calculated using... 

For erosive wear. Rockwell or Brinell hardness is likely to show an inverse relation with carbon and low alloy steels. If they contain over about 0.55 percent carbon, they can be hardened to a high level. However, at the same or even at lower hardness, certain martensitic cast irons (HC 250 and Ni-Hard) can out perform carbon and low alloy steel considerably. For simplification, each of these alloys can be considered a mixture of hard carbide and hardened steel. The usual hardness tests tend to reflect chiefly the steel portion, indicating perhaps from 500 to 650 BHN. Even the Rockwell diamond cone indenter is too large to measure the hardness of the carbides a sharp diamond point with a light load must be used. The Vickers diamond pyramid indenter provides this, giving values around 1,100 for the iron carbide in Ni-Hard and 1,700 for the chromium carbide in HC 250. (These numbers have the same mathematical basis as the more common Brinell hardness numbers.) The microscopically revealed differences in carbide hardness accounts for the superior erosion resistance of these cast irons versus the hardened steels. 

In hardness tests by scratch methods, apart from the previously mentioned diamond cones with included angle of 90° or 120°, trihedral pyramid-shaped points (Bierbaum pyramid and Berkovich pyramid) and Vickers tetrahedral pyramid (Fig. 4.3.3) are now widely used their main... 

Other formulae describing hardness tested by the scratch-with-edge-to-the-front method are also based on the ratio of load to contact surface of indenter with material under test, or to that surface projected to the sample plane. For the tetrahedral pyramid in the widely used Vickers hardness testers and in PMT-3... 

Boyarskaya (1972) carried out comparative tests to determine hardness anisotropy by indentation with a Vickers pyramid and by scratch in a number of minerals and crystals (Table 7.7, Figs. 7.4, 7.5). It is seen from the table that for most of the crystals tested the results for scratch hardness are clearer. Interesting is her finding that where K,1V is lowest, KIiR is highest. This appears to be due to a more legible test, which no doubt facilitates correct hardness measurement. 

Another criterion is used with the Vickers hardness test after penetration of a pyramid-shaped diamond under stress, the diameter of the indent is measured after removal of the diamond. The hardness is defined as the applied force divided by the area of the indent. This is again a measure of the permanent deformation, or, possibly, of the yield stress. 

In the Brinell test (Brinell, 1900 Meyer, 1908) the indenter consists of a hard steel ball, though in examining very hard metals the spherical indenter may be made of tungsten carbide or even of diamond. Another type of indenter which has been widely used is the conical or pyramidal indenter as used in the Ludwik (1908) and Vickers (see Smith Sandland (1925)) hardness tests, respectively. These indenters are now usually made of diamond. The hardness behaviour is different from that observed with spherical indenters. Other types of indenters have, at various times, been described, but they are not in wide use and do not involve new principles. 

The Vickers Hardness test uses a square-based diamond pyramid as the indenter. The Vickers Hardness, Hv, is calculated by... 

The Vickers hardness test differs from the Brinell test in that the indentor is a diamond (square-based) pyramid (Figure 3.42) having an apex angle of 136°. If the average diagonal of the indent is d, the hardness number is calculated from... 

Hardness refers to the resistance of steel to indentation. The three important methods to determine the hardness are (1) the Brinell test, (2) the Vickers test, and (3) the Rockwell test. All these methods use the same basic principle wherein a ball or a pointed indenter is forced onto the material surface under a given load and the area of indentation thus created is measured. The Brinell test uses a 10-mm-diameter tungsten ball indenter under a load of 29,420 N. The Rockwell C hardness test uses a diamond cone indenter under a load of 1471 N. The Vickers test uses a diamond pyramid indenter, and the load varies. The greater the hardness of a material, the smaller the area of indentation. 

For hardness determination, different methods are possible scratching the surface, penetration of an indenter with static or dynamic loads, or rebound as a result of elastic material behavior. The methods with a penetrating indenter are the most important ones. The applied methods are distinguished, e.g., by the shape of the indenter. Brinell hardness is determined by a ball-shaped indenter, while Vickers hardness applies a pyramid-shaped one. After the indenting test with a certain load, the surface area of the indentation is measured which delivers a value for material hardness. Determination of Rockwell hardness uses the depth of the indentation instead of the surface area (Bargel and Schulze 1988). Independent of the method, the so-called surface hardness... 

Rockwell s hardness test works in a similar way to Brinell s hardness test, i.e., it uses the depth of penetration. Contrary to Brinell s method, however, it measures the penetration of a sphere while still under a load, and then measures the remaining elastic deformation. For this reason, the Rockwell method always gives lower degrees of hardness than the Brinell method. In addition, the degrees of hardness according to the Rockwell method are not measured in physical units, but in scale numbers of 0-120. Steel balls are used with soft materials, and diamond points with hard ones. The Vicker s hardness test uses a diamond pyramid. A modified Rockwell method is used for plastics. It should be noted that, with the Rockwell hardness thus determined, the plastic deformation contribution increases only gradually, because of creep. With metals, on the other hand, the deformation is always plastic, and therefore, also independent of time. Plastics, therefore, exhibit a relatively high Rockwell hardness compared to metals. 

There are a variety of types of hardness tests, but the most popular in the case of rare earth metals seems to have been the Brinell test and the Vickers, or Diamond Pyramid Hardness (DPH) test as it is most commonly called. The DPH test is perhaps the most reliable hardness test and, in fact, should give hardness values in close agreement with the results of properly conducted Brinell and Knoop (when loads are >500 g) hardness tests. Consequently, the emphasis in this section is on DPH data, but Brinell data are also presented where they are instructive. Frequently, microhardness data are quoted in the rare earth literature. Since they are determined with a diamond pyramid indenter using lower loads than macrohardness, the author includes them with DPH values when they are in agreement with macroscopic values although it is recognized that microhardness results can be load sensitive. 

Hardness is the resistance that a body offers to penetration by a harder body. Polished sections of ceramic materials are primarily tested by the Vickers or Knoop methods, both of which can be described as indentation hardness testing methods (Fig. 143). The indenter used in Vickers hardness testing is a four-sided diamond pyramid with an included apical angle of 136°. The diamond indenter used in the Knoop method is also a four-sided pyramid, but this indenter has two different included apical angles, measuring 130° and 172°30. This causes an elongated indentation in the material being tested. 

For normal Vickers testing, the layer thicknesses should be at least 5-10 pm. Better conditions are obtained with Knoop pyramids, which feature a more favorable ratio of diagonal length to penetration depth. One particular problem is the difiiculty in recognizing the features of the indentations, which can be severely exacerbated by the roughness and morphology of the surface (Fig. 158). The individual hardness testing technique to be applied will depend on the types of layers involved and their dimensions. 

In this experiment, wear and hardness tests were performed on the disc surface facing the spacer. The hardness was measured using Vickers microhardness tester. The indenter is a square shaped diamond pyramid with a surface angle of 136°. The applied load was 0.9807 N for 15 seconds. Two distinct regions, the treated and untreated regions, were... 

Hardness is measured by the Rockwell A-scale diamond cone iadentation test (HRA) or by the Vickers diamond pyramid iadentation test (HV). Although the Rockwell scale has been used for decades ia the carbide iadustry as a measure of hardness, a tme iadication of the resistance of the tool to deformation ia metal-cuttiag operatioas can be obtained only by measuting hardness at elevated temperatures. The hardness of cemented carbides decreases monotonicaHy with increasing temperatures. 

---