Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Ground-state analyte atoms

Since AAS is a relative rather than an absolute technique, quantitation is performed by comparison with a standard. Any difference in behaviour of the analyte atoms in the sample and in the standard implies an interference. Interferences are classified conveniently into four categories chemical, physical, background, and spectral. Whereas background and spectral interferences result from the influence of "non specific" signals, chemical and physical interferences can have a positive or negative influence on the number of ground state analyte atoms present in a unit volume of the flame. [Pg.158]

An alternative approach to trace analyte detection results from the measurement of chemiluminescence in a laser-generated plume of plasma, formed when the laser beam evaporates a small amount of sample (43). In these experiments, a pulsed excimer laser-induced-plasma, formed by laser vaporization and ionization, is probed direcdy to measure ion intensity. Ground state sodium atoms, excited state copper atoms, and sodium dimer molecules have all been monitored using this technique. This laser enhanced ionization may well be one of a very few techniques which can be used to probe extremely dense plasmas with good spatial and temporal resolution. [Pg.395]

Chemical interferences occur both in flame emission and atomic absorption. This occurs whenever some chemical reaction changes the concentration of the ground state analyte element in the flame. Reference to Chapter 9, Figure 9-10, shows processes that occur in the flame that affect both atomic absorption and flame emission spectroscopic measurements. If the analyte element can form stable oxides or hydroxides, some of the ground state atoms of the element are not available for absorption of energy. The result is an absorption signal of decreased intensity thus oxide formation removes ground state atoms from the flame. [Pg.287]

In the premix burner, the sample, in solution form, is first aspirated into a nebulizer where it forms an aerosol or spray. An impact bead or flow spoiler is used to break the droplets from the nebulizer into even smaller droplets. Larger droplets coalesce on the sides of the spray chamber and drain away. Smaller droplets and vapor are swept into the base of the flame in the form of a cloud. An important feature of this burner is that only a small portion (about 5%) of the aspirated sample reaches the flame. The droplets that reach the flame are, however, very small and easily decomposed. This results in an efficient atomization of the sample in the flame. The high atomization efficiency leads to increased emission intensity and increased analytical sensitivity compared with other burner designs. The process that occurs in the burner assembly and flame is outlined in Table 7.2. This process is identical to the atomization process for atomic absorption spectrometry (AAS), but now, we want the atoms to progress beyond ground-state free atoms to the excited state. [Pg.509]

Given that the pure density is sampled at the middle of the reptile, RQMC-MI (Sect. 18.2.4.1) was the first variant to be developed and tested [20], (In that work RQMC-MI was denoted as RQMC-NC.) To provide a proof in principle, the application was to ground-state hydrogen atom, where moments of the electron density were calculated for variational densities of crude and good quality. Values for r), r ), r ), and (1/r) were found to agree within statistical error to the analytical determinations for the exact density. The time-step bias for RQMC-MI was under better control than for RQMC-MH, the approach equivalent to that of Baroni and Moroni s original RQMC algorithm. [Pg.335]

Table 8.17 The correlation energies recovered by the analytical and numerical correlation-consistent basis sets for the ground-state helium atom. The exact correlation energy is —42.044 mEh... Table 8.17 The correlation energies recovered by the analytical and numerical correlation-consistent basis sets for the ground-state helium atom. The exact correlation energy is —42.044 mEh...
Hydrogen atom, in its ground state, can be treated in an entirely analytic approach. The ealeulation of the second-order perturbed energy gives the well known values ... [Pg.267]

Self-absorption is a phenomenon whereby emitted radiation is reabsorbed as it passes outwards from the central region of the flame (cf. arc/spark spectrometry). It occurs because of interaction with ground state atoms of the analyte in the cooler outer fringes of the flame and results in attenuation of the intensity of emission. It is particularly noticeable for lines originating from the lowest excited level and increases with the concentration of the analyte solution (Figure 8.24). [Pg.318]

When primary X-rays are directed on to a secondary target, i.e. the sample, a proportion of the incident rays will be absorbed. The absorption process involves the ejection of inner (K or L) electrons from the atoms of the sample. Subsequently the excited atoms relax to the ground state, and in doing so many will lose their excess energy in the form of secondary X-ray photons as electrons from the higher orbitals drop into the hole in the K or L shell. Typical transitions are summarized in Figures 8.35 and 8.36. The reemission of X-rays in this way is known as X-ray fluorescence and the associated analytical method as X-ray fluorescence spectrometry. The relation between the two principal techniques of X-ray emission spectrometry is summarized in Figure 8.37. [Pg.339]

Basis of analytical measurement AES measures a photon emitted when an excited atom deactives to the ground state... [Pg.234]

According to the rigorous relationship between p(r) and V(r) mentioned above, it can be argued that V(r) is also fundamental in nature. In addition, it has the advantage of lending itself better to further analytical development. For instance, it was shown long ago that V(r) must decrease monotonically with radial distance from the nucleus for a ground-state atom [4]. It is known empirically that p(r) does the same [4], but the proof of this remains elusive. [Pg.253]


See other pages where Ground-state analyte atoms is mentioned: [Pg.856]    [Pg.175]    [Pg.307]    [Pg.163]    [Pg.145]    [Pg.305]    [Pg.308]    [Pg.363]    [Pg.366]    [Pg.856]    [Pg.175]    [Pg.307]    [Pg.163]    [Pg.145]    [Pg.305]    [Pg.308]    [Pg.363]    [Pg.366]    [Pg.395]    [Pg.315]    [Pg.31]    [Pg.150]    [Pg.50]    [Pg.452]    [Pg.443]    [Pg.520]    [Pg.438]    [Pg.25]    [Pg.605]    [Pg.608]    [Pg.609]    [Pg.105]    [Pg.110]    [Pg.496]    [Pg.288]    [Pg.316]    [Pg.28]    [Pg.29]    [Pg.234]    [Pg.235]    [Pg.237]    [Pg.241]    [Pg.245]    [Pg.246]    [Pg.246]    [Pg.275]    [Pg.36]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.274 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.274 ]




SEARCH



Analyte atom

Ground-state atoms

States, atomic

© 2024 chempedia.info