Glass transition determination

Lett., 81, 2727 (1998). Length Scale of Dynamic Heterogeneities at the Glass Transition Determined by Multidimensional Nuclear Magnetic Resonance. 

Glass transition determinations Decomposition reaction Reaction kinetics Phase diagrams Dehydration reactions Solid-state reactions Heats of absorption Heats of reaction Heats of polymerization Heats of sublimation Heats of transition Catalysis... 

Melting and glass transition temperatures determined by DSC Glass transition determined by DMA... 

General conditions 0.02-0.35 mmol Ln total volume 1-60 mL Melting and glass transition temperatures determined by DSC Glass transition determined by DMA... 

Tracht, U., Wilhehn, M., Heuer, A., Feng, H., Schmidt-Rohr, K., and Spiess, H. W., Length scale of dynamic heterogeneities at the glass transition determined by multidimensional nuclear magnetic resonance, Phys. Rev. Lett., 81, 27227-2730 (1998). 

Suga Hiroshi (1930-) Jap. phys. chem., expert in glass transition determination and... 

Material properties can be further classified into fundamental properties and derived properties. Fundamental properties are a direct consequence of the molecular structure, such as van der Waals volume, cohesive energy, and heat capacity. Derived properties are not readily identified with a certain aspect of molecular structure. Glass transition temperature, density, solubility, and bulk modulus would be considered derived properties. The way in which fundamental properties are obtained from a simulation is often readily apparent. The way in which derived properties are computed is often an empirically determined combination of fundamental properties. Such empirical methods can give more erratic results, reliable for one class of compounds but not for another. 

Homogeneous alloys have a single glass transition temperature which is determined by the ratio of the components. The physical properties of these alloys are averages based on the composition of the alloy. 

In this section we resume our examination of the equivalency of time and temperature in the determination of the mechanical properties of polymers. In the last chapter we had several occasions to mention this equivalency, but never developed it in detail. In examining this, we shall not only acquire some practical knowledge for the collection and representation of experimental data, but also shall gain additional insight into the free-volume aspect of the glass transition. 

Below T polymers are stiff, hard, britde, and glass-like above if the molecular weight is high enough, they are relatively soft, limp, stretchable, and can be somewhat elastic. At even higher temperatures they flow and are tacky. Methods used to determine glass-transition temperatures and the reported values for a large number of polymers may be found in References 7—9. Values for the T of common acrylate homopolymers are found in Table 1. 

Solution Polymers. Acryflc solution polymers are usually characterized by their composition, solids content, viscosity, molecular weight, glass-transition temperature, and solvent. The compositions of acryflc polymers are most readily determined by physicochemical methods such as spectroscopy, pyrolytic gas—liquid chromatography, and refractive index measurements (97,158). The solids content of acryflc polymers is determined by dilution followed by solvent evaporation to constant weight. Viscosities are most conveniently determined with a Brookfield viscometer, molecular weight by intrinsic viscosity (158), and glass-transition temperature by calorimetry. 

As appHed to hydrocarbon resins, dsc is mainly used for the determination of glass-transition temperatures (7p. Information can also be gained as to the physical state of a material, ie, amorphous vs crystalline. As a general rule of thumb, the T of a hydrocarbon resin is approximately 50°C below the softening point. Oxidative induction times, which are also deterrnined by dsc, are used to predict the relative oxidative stabiHty of a hydrocarbon resin. 

Glass-transition temperatures are commonly determined by differential scanning calorimetry or dynamic mechanical analysis. Many reported values have been measured by dilatometric methods however, methods based on the torsional pendulum, strain gauge, and refractivity also give results which are ia good agreement. Vicat temperature and britde poiat yield only approximate transition temperature values but are useful because of the simplicity of measurement. The reported T values for a large number of polymers may be found ia References 5, 6, 12, and 13. 

Determination of the glass-transition temperature, T, for HDPE is not straightforward due to its high crystallinity (16—18). The glass point is usually associated with one of the relaxation processes in HDPE, the y-relaxation, which occurs at a temperature between —100 and —140° C. The brittle point of HDPE is also close to its y-transition. 

Most Kaminsky catalysts contain only one type of active center. They produce ethylene—a-olefin copolymers with uniform compositional distributions and quite narrow MWDs which, at their limit, can be characterized by M.Jratios of about 2.0 and MFR of about 15. These features of the catalysts determine their first appHcations in the specialty resin area, to be used in the synthesis of either uniformly branched VLDPE resins or completely amorphous PE plastomers. Kaminsky catalysts have been gradually replacing Ziegler catalysts in the manufacture of certain commodity LLDPE products. They also faciUtate the copolymerization of ethylene with cycHc dienes such as cyclopentene and norhornene (33,34). These copolymers are compositionaHy uniform and can be used as LLDPE resins with special properties. Ethylene—norhornene copolymers are resistant to chemicals and heat, have high glass transitions, and very high transparency which makes them suitable for polymer optical fibers (34). 

Since successful commercialization of Kapton by Du Pont Company in the 1960s (10), numerous compositions of polyimide and various new methods of syntheses have been described in the Hterature (1—5). A successful result for each method depends on the nature of the chemical components involved in the system, including monomers, intermediates, solvents, and the polyimide products, as well as on physical conditions during the synthesis. Properties such as monomer reactivity and solubiHty, and the glass-transition temperature,T, crystallinity, T, and melt viscosity of the polyimide products ultimately determine the effectiveness of each process. Accordingly, proper selection of synthetic method is often critical for preparation of polyimides of a given chemical composition. 

---