Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Generally accepted accounting principles

US-GAAP United States Generally Accepted Accounting Principles... [Pg.14]

GAAP shall mean generally accepted accounting principles in the United States, consistently applied. [Pg.159]

Investors would view securitization in the same light as accountants do under generally accepted accounting principles. See Fin. Ac t. Standards Bd., Fin. Statement of Acer. Standards No. 77 (1983). See Schwargz, supra note 6, at 2-3 Securtitzation of Financial Assets, supra note 8, 3.02. However, others, such as rating agendesy may adopt different views. [Pg.13]

In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present fairly in all material respects the financial position of Monsanto Company and subsidiaries as of Dec. 31,1994 and 1993, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended Dec. 31,1994, in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. [Pg.113]

Several authors indicate that the concepts on which financial management is based derive from economic theory. They say that the financial measurement systems used are those applied in economic analysis for economic activity, whether for profit or nonprofit entities. For either type of operation. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles have evolved for the recording of financial transactions and for the allocation of resources. Those principles are set forth in guidelines issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board. [Pg.568]

Rogers recently reported 2005 net sales of 350 million which were 4% lower than the record figure of 365 million in 2004. On the basis of US generally accepted accounting principles the preliminary 2005 net income figure was 15.7 million. [Pg.98]

US-GAAP United States generally accepted accounting principles... [Pg.165]

The market prices used in this study represent multiple year averages for the 1990s in the United States. The capital requirements and economic estimates here presented represent the views of this present author based on interpretations of publicly available documents and are not based on any confidential information. The economic calculations follow good engineering principles and generally accepted accounting procedures, but are not guarantees of specific outcomes. [Pg.587]

The rest of this paper will be devoted to the consideration of the second kind of reactions. I shall endeavour rather to emphasise the basic assumptions of the theory than to derive ready formulas. Especially on account of some discrepancies with experiment, I think that it may be useful to see that the transition state method is based, in addition to well-established principles of statistical mechanics, on only three assumptions, two of which arc generally accepted. [Pg.172]

Certainly also important are dynamic interactions between the participants, including water, beyond the effect of the electric fields. Nonequilibrium thermodynamics can account for these at least in principle, but at this stage has not produced a theory or model that is manageable enough for practical application to soils. To become generally accepted, any new theory or model will have to demonstrate that its improvement outweigh its greater complexities. [Pg.114]

The model of network polymers considered next describes quantitatively the formation of structure (and, hence, properties) and is based on fundamental principles of physics. The initial parameters used for crosslinked systems are the v value (topological characteristics) and some generally accepted molecular parameters. Since the chemical crosslinking processes are complex, the model makes use of the simplest scheme of structure formation, which does not take into account, for example, the decrease in the rate of structure formation with time when one structure element starts to influence the conditions of formation of an adjacent element. An example of taking account of effects of this type has been reported [117]. Although this scheme is simple, it provides a quantitative description of the processes considered and the structures formed. [Pg.325]

Eurthermore, uncertainties in the exposure assessment should also be taken into account. However, no generally, internationally accepted principles for addressing these uncertainties have been developed. For predicted exposure estimates, an uncertainty analysis involving the determination of the uncertainty in the model output value, based on the collective uncertainty of the model input parameters, can be performed. The usual approach for assessing this uncertainty is the Monte Carlo simulation. This method starts with an analysis of the probability distribution of each of the variables in the uncertainty analysis. In the simulation, one random value from each distribution curve is drawn to produce an output value. This process is repeated many times to produce a complete distribution curve for the output parameter. [Pg.349]

For convenience and simplicity, polymers have generally been considered to be isotropic in which the principle force is shear stress. While such assumptions are acceptable for polymers at low shear rates, they fail to account for stresses perpendicular to the plane of the shear stress, which are encountered at high shear rates. For example, an extrudate such as the formation of a pipe or filament expands when it emerges from the die in what is called the Barus or Weissenberg effect or die swell. This behavior is not explained by simple flow theories. [Pg.463]

In most cases, evaluations of ecological impacts are site-specific and, as a consequence, are not considered when establishing a generally applicable waste classification system. These impacts normally are addressed in disposal site selection, design, and operation, and they may be used in establishing waste acceptance criteria for the site. To the extent that ecological impacts can be evaluated generi-cally, NCRP believes that the principles and framework for risk-based waste classification presented in this Report are sufficiently flexible to take them into account. [Pg.70]


See other pages where Generally accepted accounting principles is mentioned: [Pg.117]    [Pg.6]    [Pg.188]    [Pg.139]    [Pg.141]    [Pg.407]    [Pg.269]    [Pg.62]    [Pg.124]    [Pg.19]    [Pg.38]    [Pg.213]    [Pg.117]    [Pg.6]    [Pg.188]    [Pg.139]    [Pg.141]    [Pg.407]    [Pg.269]    [Pg.62]    [Pg.124]    [Pg.19]    [Pg.38]    [Pg.213]    [Pg.141]    [Pg.3]    [Pg.61]    [Pg.2608]    [Pg.463]    [Pg.192]    [Pg.113]    [Pg.26]    [Pg.501]    [Pg.46]    [Pg.704]    [Pg.280]    [Pg.259]    [Pg.29]    [Pg.50]    [Pg.124]    [Pg.222]    [Pg.201]    [Pg.510]    [Pg.265]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.141 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.568 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.62 , Pg.124 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.19 ]




SEARCH



General principles

Generality principle

Generally accepted accounting

© 2024 chempedia.info