Gasifier model

Differential Equations for Fluidized Bed Gasifier Model. In a hydrodynamical sense, the processes in fluidized bed gasifiers involve the interaction of a system of particles with flowing gas. The motion of these particles and gas is, at least in principle, completely described by the Navier-Stokes equations for the gas and by the Newtonian equations of motion for the particles. Solution of these equations together with... 

Some work has already been done on the simulation of transient behavior of moving bed coal gasifiers. However, the analysis is not based on the use of a truly dynamic model but instead uses a steady state gasifier model plus a pseudo steady state approximation. For this type of approach, the time response of the gasifier to reactor input changes appears as a continuous sequence of new steady states. 

One further note, the University of Delaware gasifier model used in the pseudo steady state approximation assumes that the gas and solids temperatures are the same within the reactor. That assumption removes an important dynamic feedback effect between the countercurrent flowing gas and solids streams. This is particularly important when the burning zone moves up and down within the reactor in an oscillatory manner in response to a step change in operating conditions. 

The nonlinear dynamic gasifier model produced a wide variety of transient response types when subjected to step changes in operating conditions. However, stepping the inlet gas (blast) temperature up and down by as much as 55.6 C (100 F) only gave steady state convergent responses. Varying the feed coal moisture... 

There are several hundreds of papers studying the kinetics of reactions involved in the pyrolysis step (27). Unfortunately for the gasifier modelling there is neither a unified approach nor an overall kinetic equation(s) describing the pyrolysis step for all possible biomass under all possible circumstances. Besides, most of the kinetic studies have been made in thermobalances or related apparatuses with low heating rates (around 25 "C/min), far from the high heating rates in fluidised beds of up to a claimed 1000 C/s or even 10000 C/s. Kinetic equations obtained in thermobalances would provide results very different from the ones in fluidised bed, which is the present case. 

Obviously, using eqn. 8 is (another one more) empirical approach, without a sound kinetic scientific basis. Authors are not happy with it but, in favour of it, it can be said that 1st) there is not yet an universally accepted kinetic equation for the pyrolysis step, 2nd) it works and is useful for the gasifier modelling, 3rd) it can be replaced for another more scientifrc approach or subroutine when it be available. 

BUBBLING FLUIDIZED BED GASIFIER MODELING VVB GASIFICATION PLANT... 

El Asri R., De Ruyck J., and Verelst H., Wood Bubbling Fluidized Bed Gasifier Modeling Through ASPEN+ , Proceeding of Flowers 97, pp.657-668, 1997. 

Hydraulic transport can be achieved using a coal-water slurry, which can be efficiently pressurized by means of displacement pumps up to 70-100 bar with no inert gas detriment [1]. In addition to stability and viscosity, the main measure for slurry quality is the solids concentration. This determines the energy density and the amount of water, which hampers process efficiency. Figure 4.4 shows the influence of the slurry solids concentration on the cold gas efficiency for several solid fuels. Figures 4.4 is compiled using a GE gasifier model with radiant and... 

It is widely accepted [52-56] that generic gasifier models are set up using history matching, meaning that experimentally measured residual carbon and individual deviations from equilibrium for selected reactions are specified in the model. Equation (5.31) introduces a so-called approach temperature Tapp, which is defined as the difference between the measured physical gas temperature Tp of the process and the associated, calculated apparent equilibrium temperature Teq, according to the gas composition see Figure 5.6, which describes the individual deviation from equilibrium. 

After establishment of the standardized state-of-the-art gasifier models, the proposed enhanced concepts were incorporated into the flow sheets. All models were evaluated and the results can be foimd in Chapter 6. 

As in all plants built, a pilot burner was integrated into the present study this requires 1.4-3.4% of the input coal LHV as support fuel (1.4% for Pitt 8 and 3.4% for ash-rich SAf coal). In the verification case, natural gas is the support fuel. To compare the gasifier models, recycled dry syngas is used as indicated (Lamp, J. (2010) Technical tour on Siemens test facility, personal note). The heat loss from the reaction chamber was also adjusted to 2.5% of the coal LHV input in accordance with the reports from the Schwarze Pumpe facilities [35,50,51,54]. 

Figure 7.4 Interplay of gasifier models and ternary gasification diagram (HTW - high-temperature Winkler, INCI - internal circulation gasifier) (with permission from Ref. [17]. Copyright 2013, Elsevier).

Because the ternary diagram demonstrates only the thermodynamic potential, the gasifier models were used to carry out a sensitivity analysis of the ash content. Figure 7.14a and b show the results for cold gas efficiency, which are, in general, consistent with the observations from Figure 7.13a. Regarding the... 

There have been several fixed bed gasifier models developed based on some simplified assxamptions (J2,73,jU,75.) Yoon et al. (T6) proposed a model assxaming gas and solids to be at the same temperature and no heat loss ffom the wall of the gasifier. 

Wen, C. Y. and Chaung, T. Z., "Entrained Bed Gasifier Model for Texaco Partial Oxidation Unit , paper in preparation. 

---