Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Gasification technology biomass feedstock

Alternative feedstocks for petrochemicals have been the subject of much research and study over the past several decades, but have not yet become economically attractive. Chemical producers are expected to continue to use fossil fuels for energy and feedstock needs for the next 75 years. The most promising sources which have received the most attention include coal, tar sands, oil shale, and biomass. Near-term advances ia coal-gasification technology offer the greatest potential to replace oil- and gas-based feedstocks ia selected appHcations (10) (see Feedstocks, coal chemicals). [Pg.176]

The means by which synthetic gaseous fuels could be produced from a variety of biomass sources are variable and many of the known gasification technologies can be appHed to the problem (70,71,76—82). For example, the Lurgi circulatory fluidized-bed gasifier is available for the production of gaseous products from biomass feedstocks as well as from coal (83,84). [Pg.75]

Gasification coupled with water-gas shift is the most widely practiced process route for biomass to hydrogen. Thermal, steam, and partial oxidation gasification technologies are under development. Feedstocks include both dedicated crops and agricultural and forest product residues of hardwood, softwood, and herbaceous species. [Pg.135]

Gasification technologies offer the potential of clean and efficient energy. The technologies enable the production of synthetic gas from low or negative-value carbon-based feedstocks such as coal, petroleum coke, high sulfur fuel oil, materials that would otherwise be disposed as waste, and biomass. The gas can be used in place of natural gas to generate electricity, or as a basic raw material to produce chemicals and liquid fuels. [Pg.337]

Second-generation biofuel technologies make use of a much wider range of biomass feedstock (e.g., forest residues, biomass waste, wood, woodchips, grasses and short rotation crops, etc.) for the production of ethanol biofuels based on the fermentation of lignocellulosic material, while other routes include thermo-chemical processes such as biomass gasification followed by a transformation from gas to liquid (e.g., synthesis) to obtain synthetic fuels similar to diesel. The conversion processes for these routes have been available for decades, but none of them have yet reached a high scale commercial level. [Pg.160]

Syngas composition, most importantly the H2/CO ratio, varies as a function of production technology and feedstock. Steam methane reforming yields H2/CO ratios of three to one whereas coal and biomass gasification yields ratios closer to unity or lower. Conversely, the required properties of the syngas are a function of the synthesis process. Fewer moles of product almost always occur when H2 and CO are converted to fuels and chemicals. Consequently, syngas conversion processes are more thermodynamically favorable at higher H2 and CO partial pressures. The optimum pressures depend on the specific synthesis process. [Pg.1519]

When perfected, synthesis-gas-to-ethanol technology can be expected to have a large impact on fermentation ethanol markets. It is likely that thermochemical ethanol would then be manufactured at production costs in the same range as methanol from synthesis gas, which can be produced by gasification of virtually any fossil or biomass feedstock. Applying the advances that have been made for conversion of lignocellulosic feedstocks via enzymatically catalyzed options, it has been estimated that the production cost of fermentation ethanol... [Pg.437]

Recently two feedstock databases have been established where a significant amount of information is provided for a variety of biomass feedstocks (27, 28). In the databases, the basic physico-chemical properties of biomass fuels can be found which will provide basic information to gasifier developers as well as gasifier users on the quality and suitability of the various fuels for the gasification technologies they either develop or use. [Pg.5]

Hofbauer, H., et al., (1997) Gasification Feedstock Database. lEA Bioenergy, Task XU Thermal Gasification of Biomass, Vienna Institute of Technology, Vienna. [Pg.28]

Low BTU gasification technology is commercially available for most types of biomass feedstocks and can be expected to have an impact on energy supplies by 1985. Many of these commercial processes are based on low BTU coal gasification technologies and the gas produced can best be used as fuel for supplying process heat, process steam or for electrical power generation. [Pg.26]

Science Applications, Inc., has recently completed a comprehensive technical and economic assessment of producing methanol from biomass feedstocks employing developed gasification technology. This study includes an assessment of biomass availability and the distribution and markets for methanol fuels as well as thermochemical conversion technology. [Pg.33]


See other pages where Gasification technology biomass feedstock is mentioned: [Pg.46]    [Pg.232]    [Pg.238]    [Pg.193]    [Pg.215]    [Pg.217]    [Pg.24]    [Pg.78]    [Pg.78]    [Pg.127]    [Pg.78]    [Pg.187]    [Pg.187]    [Pg.46]    [Pg.103]    [Pg.117]    [Pg.118]    [Pg.249]    [Pg.250]    [Pg.232]    [Pg.238]    [Pg.145]    [Pg.290]    [Pg.313]    [Pg.316]    [Pg.325]    [Pg.406]    [Pg.514]    [Pg.26]    [Pg.209]    [Pg.1578]    [Pg.11]    [Pg.157]    [Pg.76]    [Pg.30]    [Pg.47]    [Pg.232]    [Pg.238]    [Pg.69]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.435 , Pg.436 ]




SEARCH



Biomass feedstock

Biomass gasification

Biomass technology

Gasification technology

© 2024 chempedia.info