Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Frictional Loading

The frictional properties of plastics are of particular importance to applications in machine products and in sliding applications such as belting and structural units such as sliding doors. The range of friction properties are rather extensive. The relationship between the normal force and the friction force is used to define the coefficient of static friction. [Pg.94]

Friction coefficients will vary for a particular material from the value just as motion starts to the value it attains in motion. The coefficient depends on the surface of the material, whether rough or smooth, as well as the composition of the material. Frequently the surface of a particular plastics will exhibit significantly different friction characteristics from that of a cut surface of the same smoothness. These variations and others that are reviewed make it necessary to do careful testing for an application which relies on the friction characteristics of plastics. Once the friction characteristics are defined, however, they are stable for a particular material fabricated in a stated manner. [Pg.94]

Several other factors affect the frictional forces. If one or both of the contacting surfaces have a relatively low compression modulus it is possible to make intimate contact between the surfaces which will lead to high friction forces in the case of plastics having good adhesion. It can add to the friction forces in another way. The displacement of material in front of the moving object adds a mechanical element to the friction forces. [Pg.95]

All sliding friction forces are dramatically affected by surface contamination. If the surface is covered with a material that prevents the adhesive forces from acting, the coefficient is reduced. If the material is a liquid which has low shear viscosity the condition exists of lubricated sliding where the characteristics of the liquid control the friction rather than the surface friction characteristics of the materials. It is possible by the addition of surface materials that have high adhesion to increase the coefficient of friction. [Pg.95]

A different type of low friction or low drag application is encountered with sliding doors or conveyor belts sliding on support surfaces. In applications like this the normal forces are generally quite small and the friction load problems are of the sticking variety. Some plastics exhibit excellent track surfaces for this type of application. TFEs have the lowest coefficient of any solid material and represent one of the most slippery surfaces known. The major problem with TFE is that its abrasion resistance is low so that most of the applications utilize filled compositions with ceramic filler materials to improve the abrasion resistance. [Pg.95]


All these features can be rationalized with the simple model of chain scission through frictional loading previously mentioned. The series of experiments performed in transient elongational flow and reported in this review show that... [Pg.171]

Although we made no attempt to elucidate the mechanism of friction decreases in rubbers after surface fluorination, it seems to us that apart from the substitution of H atoms to F in the polymer macromolecule, which forms a fluoropolymer on the surface, there is another phenomenon that makes a significant contribution to the friction decreases, i.e., fluorination of carbon black, which is used in rubber recipes for reinforcement. It appears that when the carbon black in the surface of the rubber is fluorinated it produces a lubricating effect, followed by blooming on the surface of the treated rubber while it is under a friction load. So, in our opinion, two effects contribute to friction decrease of carbon-filled rubbers fluorination of the rubber macromolecules and fluorination of the carbon black rubbers that do not contain carbon black show a much smaller decrease in friction after XeF2 treatment. [Pg.235]

In analogy to indentation experiments, measurements of the lateral contact stiffness were used for determining the contact radius [114]. For achieving this, the finite stiffness of tip and cantilever have to be taken into account, which imposes considerable calibration issues. The lateral stiffness of the tip was determined by means of a finite element simulation [143]. As noted by Dedkov [95], the agreement of the experimental friction-load curves of Carpick et al. [115] with the JKR model is rather unexpected when considering the low value of the transition parameter A(0.2Further work seems to be necessary in order to clarify the limits of validity of the particular contact mechanics models, especially with regard to nanoscale contacts. [Pg.116]

In principle, the endpoint methodology considers that as a particular layer clears, the material on the next layer exhibits a different coefficient of friction (change in the current due to a difference of frictional loading). However another factor affecting the curve traces was found to be the carrier arm movement motion across the primary platen and the conditioning head (both... [Pg.109]

For surfaces that deform plastically, the contact area A is proportional to the applied load. A single elastic contact deforms as as load increases, and would not be expected to follow this rule. However, when considering an exponential surface height distribution, which leads to a multiplicity of elastic asperity contacts, a linearity between load and contact area is recovered. Using instrumentation developed in the last 15yr, notably the atomic force microscope (AFM) and surface forces apparatus (SFA), researchers have explored the universality of friction-load proportionality over a much wider range of dimensions and surface characteristics. Indeed, SFA experiments have shown friction-load proportionality between atomically smooth mica surfaces in dry air over square micrometers of contact area. A contact mechanics expression for elastic contacts that incorporates the effects of adhesion was used. Similarly, AFM experiments of... [Pg.1838]

Qc is the actual point load transmitted by the pile Qa is the actual skin friction load transmitted by the pile L is the length of the pile E is the modulus of elasticity of the pile A is the area of pile... [Pg.394]


See other pages where Frictional Loading is mentioned: [Pg.160]    [Pg.783]    [Pg.616]    [Pg.94]    [Pg.96]    [Pg.681]    [Pg.153]    [Pg.160]    [Pg.171]    [Pg.172]    [Pg.174]    [Pg.89]    [Pg.92]    [Pg.93]    [Pg.171]    [Pg.85]    [Pg.98]    [Pg.120]    [Pg.149]    [Pg.151]    [Pg.85]    [Pg.607]    [Pg.67]    [Pg.960]    [Pg.1839]    [Pg.965]    [Pg.299]    [Pg.787]    [Pg.61]    [Pg.339]    [Pg.457]    [Pg.693]    [Pg.193]    [Pg.108]    [Pg.92]    [Pg.252]    [Pg.649]    [Pg.135]    [Pg.96]    [Pg.119]    [Pg.458]   


SEARCH



© 2024 chempedia.info