Frictional coefficient pairs

In the past decade, effects of an EEF on the properties of lubrication and wear have attracted significant attention. Many experimental results indicate that the friction coefficient changes with the intensity of the EEF on tribo-pairs. These phenomena are thought to be that the EEF can enhance the electrochemical reaction between lubricants and the surfaces of tribo-pairs, change the tropism of polar lubricant molecules, or help the formation of ordered lubricant molecular layers [51,73-77]. An instrument for measuring lubricant film thickness with a technique of the relative optical interference intensity (ROII) has been developed by Luo et al. [4,48,51,78] to capture such real-time interference fringes and to study the phenomenon when an EEF is applied, which is helpful to the understanding of the mechanism of thin film lubrication under the action of the EEF. 

R. A. Marcus In Chem. Phys. Lett. 244, 10 (1995), a very rough approximate hard-sphere model used for liquids was mentioned to relate the frictional coefficient to the pair distribution function in the cluster. 

Since DFT calculations are in principle only applicable for the electronic ground state, they cannot be used in order to describe electronic excitations. Still it is possible to treat electronic exciations from first principles by either using quantum chemistry methods [114] or time-dependent density-functional theory (TDDFT) [115,116], First attempts have been done in order to calculate the chemicurrent created by an atom incident on a metal surface based on time-dependent density functional theory [117, 118]. In this approach, three independent steps are preformed. First, a conventional Kohn-Sham DFT calculation is performed in order to evaluate the ground state potential energy surface. Then, the resulting Kohn-Sham states are used in the framework of time-dependent DFT in order to obtain a position dependent friction coefficient. Finally, this friction coefficient is used in a forced oscillator model in which the probability density of electron-hole pair excitations caused by the classical motion of the incident atom is estimated. 

In using Eqs. 19 and 34 as starting points for the development of the theory of transport processes, several tasks remain. The first and perhaps simplest is to develop expressions for the transport coefficients in terms of the single and pair densities /(1> and /< >. Next the continuity equations must be solved to give explicit expressions for the densities when the system is perturbed from its equilibrium state by the transport process under consideration. Finally, it is required to obtain the frictional coefficient f in terms of the intermolecular potential energy function according to Eq. 33. 

The introduction of Eq. 34 with time-smoothing in the Kirkwood method eliminates detailed consideration of the higher-order distributions such as /<8> in the continuity equation for /(2). In a sense, however, they implicitly reappear in the evaluation of the frictional coefficients. Kirkwood avoids the reintroduction of the triplet density /(3) by the assumption that the pair frictional tensors and may be equated to the singlet friction tensor U which is evaluated in terms of the pair densities /<2). 

Friction is defined as the resistance encountered when one body moves tangentially over another and they are in contact. Friction often embraces two classes of relative motion sliding and rolling. In industrial processes, frictional energy is usually dissipated as waste heat. The friction force is represented by F and the friction coefficient by p. Under many sliding conditions, the p for a given pair of materials and fixed conditions of lubrication is mostly constant. The three laws of friction are ... 

While manufacturers will always provide the value of the valve conductance, C, they do not give the value of the conductance to the valve throat, C, so that it is not possible to calculate the friction coefficient, Cyj, directly from equation (7.8). However, equivalent information is normally made available for the special condition when the pressure in the valve throat is at the vapour pressure of the liquid being passed. This information is contained in the manufacturer-supplied cavitation coefficient, Kc, which is used in the following equation pair to define the pressure conditions at the onset of cavitation ... 

This sequence of collision events clearly shows how collisions of the solute molecules with the solvent can lead to a coupling between the motions of the solute molecules. This notion of solvent coupling of solute motion in the liquid is reminiscent of the hydrodynamic interaction effect on the friction coefficient of a pair of molecules, briefly discussed in the preceding section. In fact, the terms explicitly written in (10.11) simply represent, from a microscopic collisional point of view, the effects of such hydrodynamic interactions on the rate kernel. 

Figure 24. Friction coefficient, f, and wear coefficient, k, of SiC/SiC sliding pairs as a function of sliding velocity with 10 N for various temperatures (sintered SiC EKasic D , after Habig and Woydt, BAM Berlin/Germany [220]).

Wear testing plasma sprayed chrome oxide-silica, plasma sprayed PS 212 or mid-temperature CVD Ti(C,N) rub shoes against a CVD CrN disk at 350 C, lubricated, produced very high friction coefficients (0.17-0.21). The high friction coefficients caused high CrN wear rates and for this reason, only one of these material pairs was tested for over 30 minutes before the wear track had completely worn through the 2 to 3 micron thick CrN coaLing. 

Isotropic correlation times and spin lattice relaxation times measured by and H-NMR for polyoxyethylene (POE) solutions in a variety of solvents have been computed using the DRIS formalism for isolated polymer chains [8]. For this purpose, the conformational kinetics of POE has been analyzed and kinetic schemes of rotameric transitions have been estimated for the three distinct types of bond pairs (CO, OC), (OC, CC) and (CC, CO) on the backbone. The effective friction coefficient is deduced from the viscosity of the solvent, irrespective of the size of the kinetic unit, assuming environmental effects and chain connectivity constraints to be of secondary importance compared to torsional energy barriers. The reader is referred to [8] for explicit expressions of... 

The frictional behaviour of polymers differs somewhat from that of perhaps more familiar materials. The frictional force tends to be proportional not to load (as in the classical case) but to speed. The coefficient of friction is very dependent on the nature of the two surfaces in contact, but is generally low, when suitable pairs are selected. This means that plastics gears can usually be run without external lubricants. Often the static friction coefficient is lower than the dynamic, which helps to explain the absence of slip-stick phenomenon exhibited by some plastics systems in motion this is especially marked with PTFE, which has an exceptionally low coefficient (around 0.02). The non-classical response of plastics materials results from their much lower modulus. Their frictional response is characterized by adhesion and deformation. 

For the bare steel/glass pair in HEPES, (i), the friction coefficient I ( = friction/load) increased erratically during the initial few revolutions ( running-in process) and then settled down to a constant value of / 0.5. On... 

FIG U RE 18.10 Examples of dependences of friction coefficient changes on time for a steel-pin-polyamide-disc pair for water and 0.01% aqueous solutions of SML/ESMIS mixtures. The following SML/ESMIS ratios were investigated 0 10,1 9, 3 7,5 5, and 7 3. 

---