Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Friction different temperatures

Rubber friction differs from that of friction between hard solids in that the friction force is a nonlinear function of the load and depends strongly on both speed and temperature, whilst in hard solids the load dependence is linear and the friction force is virtually independent of speed and temperature [1]. [Pg.687]

FIGURE 26.1 Experimental friction data (left) as function log speed at different temperatures and master curve (right) of an acrylate-butadiene rubber (ABR) gum compound on a clean dry silicon carbide 180 track surface referred to room temperature. (From Grosch, K.A., Sliding Friction and Abbrasion of Rubbers, PhD thesis. University of London, London, 1963.)... [Pg.687]

To study effects of temperature, the entire excitation and detection assembly was placed in a chamber with controlled temperature and humidity. The test was done at 20 different temperatures from 4°C to 75°C. Each test took 4-5 sec. so there could be no significant temperature rise due to internal friction in the test sample. [Pg.101]

FIGURE 4.17 Coefficient of friction curves during conditioning at different temperatures (from Ref. 11). [Pg.101]

Figure 9.2 Variation of Friction with Life for an In Situ Film at Different Temperatures (Ref.246)... Figure 9.2 Variation of Friction with Life for an In Situ Film at Different Temperatures (Ref.246)...
Moreover, the ratios Tj/Xj obtained at different temperatures are similar to the values obtained for labell polybutadiene in dilute solution in toluene (= 30). Thus, the surrounding chains seem to affect local dynamics only at the level of the friction coefficient. Intrachain connectivity remains the essential non isotropic constraint on local dynamics in bulk polymers and models for the isolated chain are applicable. This is consistent with the idea that topological interchain effects only act on a... [Pg.116]

Site differences might be affected by hydration, friction or temperature. [Pg.3815]

While examining the shape of the curve of the sensitivity to impact of TNT at different temperatures (Vol. 1, p. 320, Fig. 74). T. Urbadski (48) advanced an hypothesis that the increase of sensitivity is due to the increase of entropy (S) and therefore decrease of free energy G - H-TS. A critical change is at the melting point of TNT - ca, 80 C which is well known, is manifested by a rapid increase of entropy (Fig. 2). Cruchaud [79] drew attention to the electric phenomena which accompany the shock and friction produced by the impact. Charging with static electricity is an important factor influencing the explosion according to this author. [Pg.19]

D is correct. Unless the box and the incline are at different temperatures, there can be no heat. Energy transfer due to friction is work. [Pg.188]

Figure 10. Test of scaling prediction made implicitly in Eq. (28). Experimental data for different temperatures between 53 and 373 K were taken from Ref. 80. The upper inset shows the maximum friction force as a function of temperature. The lower inset shows significantly worse scaling for linear creep, using ln(t)/T). The units of velocity are nanometers per second, and temperature is in degrees kelvin. With permission from Ref. 87. PItys. Rev. Lett. 87, 174301 (2001). Figure 10. Test of scaling prediction made implicitly in Eq. (28). Experimental data for different temperatures between 53 and 373 K were taken from Ref. 80. The upper inset shows the maximum friction force as a function of temperature. The lower inset shows significantly worse scaling for linear creep, using ln(t)/T). The units of velocity are nanometers per second, and temperature is in degrees kelvin. With permission from Ref. 87. PItys. Rev. Lett. 87, 174301 (2001).
The thermodynamic parameters 1/) and K introduced above, pertaining to polymer-solvent interactions in dilute solutions, may be determined from thermodynamic studies of dilute solutions of the polymer, e.g., from osmotic pressure or turbidity measurements at different temperatures. These parameters may also be determined, at least in principle, from viscosity measurements on polymer solutions (see Frictional Propcitics of Polymers). The parameter ij, which is a measure of the entropy of mixing, appears to be related to the spatial or geometrical character of the solvent. For those solvents having cyclic structures, which are relatively compact and symmetrical (e.g., benzene, toluene, and cyclohexane), xp has relatively higher values than for the less symmetrical acyclic solvents capable of assuming a number of different configurations. Cyclic solvents are thus more favorable... [Pg.174]

The viscosity method makes use of the fact that the exponent, a, in the Mark-Houwink equation (see Frictional Properties of Polymer Molecules in Dilute Solution), rj = KM° , is equal to 0.5 for a random coil in a theta-solvent. A series of polymers of the same type with widely different known molecular weights is used to determine intrinsic viscosities [t ] at different temperatures and hence a at different temperatures. The theta-temperature can thus be determined either by direct experiment or, if it is not in the measurable range, by calculation. [Pg.176]

Equations of this type can describe both the physical dipole/dipole interactions and the subsequent desorption from the film. Since ka and k have different temperature coefficients, increasing temperature can lead to either increased, decreased or unchanged surface coverage. Provided that a critical minimum surface is maintained, wear and friction can be controlled. But once 0 falls below this critical value, believed to be approx 0.5, friction and wear will rise. The adsorption of dilinoleic acid [4], a series of organic sulphur compounds [5] and a ZDDP (zinc dialkyldithiophosphate) [6] has been described in these terms. [Pg.85]

The strain rates and temperatures prevailing in abrasion are very different from those used in routine laboratory testing of tensile or tear strength. Because of friction, local temperatures may far exceed those of the test track or of the bulk of the rubber (229-230). Even at small sliding velocities the effective strain rate is very large, as small volume elements of rubber are deformed repeatedly to high strains by the many surface... [Pg.225]

For simple molecular liquids Batschinski had shown that the viscosity or internal friction at different temperatures could be expressed as a function of the mole volumes at these temperatures in the form... [Pg.755]

The explanation proposed by Ngai and Plazek [1990], was based on the postulate that the number of couplings between the macromolecules varies with concentration and temperature of the blend. The number of couplings, n, can be calculated from the shift factor, a. = [ (T)/ (T )] < ">, where ( g(T) is the Rouse friction coefficient. Thus, in miscible, single phase systems, as either the concentration or temperature changes, the chain mobility changes and relaxation spectra of polymeric components in the blends show different temperature dependence, i.e., the t-T principle cannot be obeyed. Similar conclusions were reached from a postulate that the deviation originates from different temperature dependence of the relaxation functions of the blend components [Booij and Palmen, 1992]. [Pg.518]

Perrin plot and red-edge excitation spectra experiments performed on Trp residues of sialylated and asialylated ai-acid glycoprotein have shown that in both proteins the intrinsic fluorophore displays local motions and are surrounded by a flexible environment. However, the above two mentioned methods yield information on the mean residual motion and can in no way give an indication on the dynamics of each class of Trp residues. In fact, the exposed tryptophan residue should be expected to rotate much more freely than the hydrophobic residues. In order to study the dynamics behavior of each class of Ti p residues, steady-state measurements of emission anisotropy at different temperatures (-45 to + 30°C) can be carried out. This method (the Weber s method) known also as the Y-plot, allows deriving parameters characteristic of the environment of the rotating unit, such as the thermal coefficient of the frictional resistance to the rotation of the fluorophore. [Pg.315]

One way of addressing whether or not the order or microstructure of the LC has any bearing on its performance as a lubricant under boundary conditions is to measure the effect of temperature on its friction and wear properties. Since TLCs have different orders at different temperatures, differences in measured friction can be attributed to such orders (Figure 1). [Pg.84]

Figure ih shows optical micrographs of frictional tracks on PPS specimen at four different temperatures. The transferred material of the PPS specimen also increases with temperature and there is very much of it at 100 0 as well as at 200 0. There appear to be many short glass fibers in the transferred layer at hi temperature. Figure 15 shows optical micrographs of frictional tracks made by PES at four different temperatures. The transferred material of PES also increases with temperature and a considerably thicker transferred layer is produced at high temperatures than at low temperatures. [Pg.117]

The differences between the coefficients of initial and steady-state friction at temperatures below the critical temperatxire are... [Pg.117]


See other pages where Friction different temperatures is mentioned: [Pg.612]    [Pg.710]    [Pg.687]    [Pg.392]    [Pg.542]    [Pg.191]    [Pg.517]    [Pg.124]    [Pg.1007]    [Pg.107]    [Pg.13]    [Pg.255]    [Pg.309]    [Pg.100]    [Pg.203]    [Pg.449]    [Pg.2]    [Pg.284]    [Pg.313]    [Pg.1301]    [Pg.6165]    [Pg.45]    [Pg.112]    [Pg.117]    [Pg.80]    [Pg.298]    [Pg.302]    [Pg.304]    [Pg.322]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.153 ]




SEARCH



Friction temperature

Variation of Friction with Life for an In-Situ Film at Different Temperatures

© 2024 chempedia.info