Water friction coefficient

This formula is another variation on the Affinity Laws. Monsieur s Darcy and VVeisbach were hydraulic civil engineers in France in the mid 1850s (some 50 years before Mr. H VV). They based their formulas on friction losses of water moving in open canals. They applied other friction coefficients from some private experimentation, and developed their formulas for friction losses in closed aqueduct tubes. Through the years, their coefficients have evolved to incorporate the concepts of laminar and turbulent flow, variations in viscosity, temperature, and even piping with non uniform (rough) internal. surface finishes. With. so many variables and coefficients, the D/W formula only became practical and popular after the invention of the electronic calculator. The D/W forntula is extensive and eomplicated, compared to the empirieal estimations of Mr. H W. 

The friction coefficient at PVA gel/OTS modified quartz is 0.300 while that at PVA gel/unmodrfied quartz is 0.076. Frictions were measured by using a rheometer (ARES, TA instruments) as a function of sliding velocity in water and these values were calculated from the experimental resultsoflowestsbdingvelodty,7.5 x 10 m/s. 

Water adsorped on surfaces is well known to substantially affect friction coefficients (Donnet et al., 1996). Other absorbates also affect hardness values. 

Hardness measurements of non-metallic solids are influenced by environmental factors. These have been studied extensively by Westwood (Westwood et al., 1981) and others. However, the evidence is that most, if not all, of the observed effects result from changes in the indenter/specimen friction coefficient caused by adsorption. Under ambient conditions, water vapor is commonly adsorped (Hanneman and Westbrook, 1968). In the presence of various liquids both solvents and solutes are adsorped. Since the effects are not intrinsic to the specimens, they will not be discussed further here. 

Friction coefficients, which were near 0.2 initially, decreased with sliding distance, presumably due to the removal of contaminant layers. The friction of DLC has been found to be generally low in inert and vacuum environments, with water having a deleterious effect. ... 

For calculation of flow in fire main systems, the design engineer should use the Hazen-Williams friction coefficient of C = 100 in the design of bare steel and concrete steel lined pipingforfire water systemsto allow for future deterioration as the system ages. A friction coefficient of C = 140 may be used for plastic pipe, such as fiber reinforced plastic (FRP) or polyvinyl chloride (PVC). 

Momentum boundary layer calculations are useful to estimate the skin friction on a number of objects, such as on a ship hull, airplane fuselage and wings, a water surface, and a terrestrial surface. Once we know the boundary layer thickness, occurring where the velocity is 99% of the free-stream velocity, skin friction coefficient and the skin friction drag on the solid surface can be calculated. Estimate the laminar boundary layer thickness of a 1-m-long, thin flat plate moving through a calm atmosphere at 20 m/s. 

There are a number of quantitative features of Eq. (14) which are important in relation to rapid diffusional transport in binary systems. The mutual diffusion coefficient is primarily dependent on four parameters, namely the frictional coefficient 21 the virial coefficients, molecular weight of component 2 and its concentration. Therefore, for polymers for which water is a good solvent (strongly positive values of the virial coefficients), the magnitude of (D22)v and its concentration dependence will be a compromise between the increasing magnitude of with concentration and the increasing value of the virial expansion with concentration. 

When water passes through a polymer network, a frictional resistance arises between water and the network. What happens to the transport phenomenon of water through the network if the polymer network approaches its critical temperature This is a naive but very important question. Tokita et al. carried out a friction coefficient measurement of NIPA gel as a function of temperature [87]. They found that the friction coefficient f normalized by the solvent viscosity rj, f/t, changed more than three orders of magnitude by approaching... 

Currents in rivers and streams are turbulent. Turbulent mixing can be described by the Fickian laws (Eqs.18-6 and 18-14) and by empirical turbulent diffusion coefficients Ea, where a stands for x, y, z (Chapter 22). The main source of turbulence is the friction between the water and the river bed. It can be expected that increasing roughness of the river leads to increasing turbulence, much in the same way as a large roughness causes the mean flow u to become slow (see the effect on Eq. 24-4 if the friction coefficient f increases). In fact, turbulence in rivers can be scaled by the shear velocity, u, defined in Eq. 24-5. 

The steady state velocity of water flow thus obtained is plotted as a function of the applied pressure in Fig. 5. The relationship between the applied pressure and the velocity is linear as expected. The friction coefficient, f= l.OxlO11 Pas cm-2, is obtained from the slope of the straight line in Fig. 5 using the following equation... 

The temperature dependence of the friction coefficient of poly(acrylamide) gel was studied at two different concentrations of acrylamide (AAm) and N,N -methylenebisacrylamide (Bis) AAm Bis = 1.24 M 22.4 mM and AAm Bis = 693 mM 7 mM. The weight concentrations of these sample gels was about 8.8 and 5 wt.%, respectively. The composition of the latter gel is almost the same as the composition typically recommended for acrylamide gel electrophoresis. The friction coefficient of these gels was measured at a fixed pressure of 5.88 x 103 Pa, which corresponds to 60 cm of the height of the water column. The temperature was varied from about 0 to 60 °C. 

---