Free electron defined

The free electron resides in a quantized energy well, defined by k (in wave-numbers). This result Ccm be derived from the Schroedinger wave-equation. However, in the presence of a periodic array of electromagnetic potentials arising from the atoms confined in a crystalline lattice, the energies of the electrons from all of the atoms are severely limited in orbit and are restricted to specific allowed energy bands. This potential originates from attraction and repulsion of the electron clouds from the periodic array of atoms in the structure. Solutions to this problem were... 

Figure 3.8 Plots of the heights of the steps in Fig. 3.5 divided by the electron charge in order to get a potential. Via the relations in Fig. 3.7, these steps are all functions ofFo - On the vertical axis is the highest potential at which a step in the ORR is downhill in ftee energy, depicted as a function of the binding of O. The step that first becomes uphill in free energy defines (AEq)U. Steps 1 and 4 (lines labeled AGi and AG4, respectively) define the lower volcano and thereby t/oS (AFo)- Pt is the pure metal closest to the top.

Here r and v are respectively the electron position and velocity, r = —(e2 /em)(r/r3) is the acceleration in the coulombic field of the positive ion and q = /3kBT/m. The mobility of the quasi-free electron is related to / and the relaxation time T by p = e/m/3 = et/m, so that fi = T l. In the spherically symmetrical situation, a density function n(vr, vt, t) may be defined such that n dr dvr dvt = W dr dv here, vr and vt and are respectively the radical and normal velocities. Expectation values of all dynamical variables are obtained from integration over n. Since the electron experiences only radical force (other than random interactions), it is reasonable to expect that its motion in the v space is basically a free Brownian motion only weakly coupled to r and vr by the centrifugal force. The correlations1, K(r, v,2) and fc(vr, v(2) are then neglected. Another condition, cr(r)2 (r)2, implying that the electron distribution is not too much delocalized on r, is verified a posteriori. Following Chandrasekhar (1943), the density function may now be written as an uncoupled product, n = gh, where... 

In high-mobility liquids, the quasi-free electron is often visualized as having an effective mass m different fron the usual electron mass m. It arises due to multiple scattering of the electron while the mean free path remains long. The ratio of mean acceleration to an external force can be defined as the inverse effective mass. Often, the effective mass is equated to the electron mass m when its value is unknown and difficult to determine. In LRGs values of mVm 0.3 to 0.5 have been estimated (Asaf and Steinberger,1974). Ascarelli (1986) uses mVm = 0.27 in LXe and a density-dependent value in LAr. 

The distinctive feature of the catalytically active metals is that they possess between 6 and 10 d-electrons, which are much more localized on the atoms than the s-electrons are. The d-electrons certainly do not behave as a free electron gas. Instead they spread over the crystal in well-defined bands which have retained characteristics of the atomic d-orbitals. 

Jnst as free protons do not exist in solution in acid-base reactions, there are no free electrons in redox reactions. However it is possible to define the activity of electrons relative to a specified standard state and thereby treat electrons as discrete species in equilibrinm calcnlations in the same way as ions and molecules. The standard state of electron activity for this pnrpose is by convention defined with respect to the redox conple made by hydrogen ions and hydrogen gas ... 

The free electron activity, pE, which indicates the redox intensity in a system, is defined as... 

Reductants and oxidants are defined as electron donors and proton acceptors (Sect. 2.2.2). Because there are no free electrons, every oxidation is accompanied by a reduction and vice versa. In aqueous solutions, proton activities are defined by the pH ... 

Since the free electrons and holes in a crystal act. respectively, as free positive and negative valencies (we are dealing with ciystals with more or less sharply defined ionic bonds), it follows that the weak form of chemisorption is that in which the free valencies of the surface play no part, whereas strong chemisorption takes place when the free valence of the surface contributes to the bond, this valence being localized and attached to the valence of the adsorbed particle. We have the acceptor or donor form of strong chemisorption, depending upon which of the free valencies of the surface (positive or negative) is involved. 

Space-coordinate density transformations have been used by a number of authors in various contexts related to density functional theory [26,27, 53-64, 85-87]. As the free-electron gas wavefunction is expressed in terms of plane waves associated with a constant density, these transformations were introduced by Macke in 1955 for the purpose of producing modified plane waves that incorporate the density as a variable. In this manner, the density could be then be regarded as the variational object [53, 54]. Thus, explicitly a set of plane waves (defined in the volume V in and having uniform density po = N/V) ... 

The general Jacobian problem associated with the transformation of a density Pi(r) into a density p2(r) (where these densities differ from that of the free-electron gas) was discussed by Moser in 1965 [58]. This work was not performed in the framework of orbital transformations - which might have interested chemists, nor was it done in the context of density functional theory - which might have attracted the attention of physicists. It was a paper written for mathematicians and, as such, it remained unknown to the quantum chemistry community. In the discussion that follows, we use the more accessible reformulation of Bokanowski and Grebert (1995) [65] which relies heavily on the work of Zumbach and Maschke (1983) [61]. Let us define as ifjy = the space of... 

The Fermi surface plays an important role in the theory of metals. It is defined by the reciprocal-space wavevectors of the electrons with largest kinetic energy, and is the highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO) in molecular orbital theory. For a free electron gas, the Fermi surface is spherical, that is, the kinetic energy of the electrons is only dependent on the magnitude, not on the direction of the wavevector. In a free electron gas the electrons are completely delocalized and will not contribute to the intensity of the Bragg reflections. As a result, an accurate scale factor may not be obtainable from a least-squares refinement with neutral atom scattering factors. 

In some cases, macroscopic models are used for simplified discussions of certain phenomena without atomic resolution. A macroscopic tip-sample distance should be defined. To avoid confusion, we use the term barrier thickness instead. Throughout the book, the barrier thickness is always denoted by a upper-case letter, such as W or L. In the Sommerfeld model of the free-electron metals, the barrier thickness is the distance between the surface of the metal pieces. In the jellium model (see Chapter 4), the barrier thickness is defined as the distance between the image-force planes. 

The simplest model of a metal is therefore the one in which the metal is depicted as an array of ions glued together by conduction (quasi-free) electrons. If this is the case, one may define a metallic valence" as being, essentially, the charge left in the ion cores when outer electrons have been stripped off. Conversely, the metallic valence can be defined as the contribution of outer electrons each atom gives to the sea of bonding conduction electrons. 

---