Four-body term

Extension to a molecule with more than four atoms or to a solid is straightforward. Usually the two-body terms are much larger than the three-body terms, which in turn are greater than the four-body. For ionic solids, for example, the three-body and four-body terms are often neglected. In contrast, for metals and semiconductors including only two-body terms leads to very poor results (see Sutton (Further reading)). 

For ionic solids, where directional bonding is largely absent, three- and four-body terms are often neglected, and eq. (11.1) becomes... 

The construction of four-body correction potentials is even much more complex and as four-body terms have only small contributions to the total interaction energy are rarely performed. Therefore, only two-body potentials and eventually a three-body correction are utilised in the majority of classical simulations. 

A further point to be taken into account in the discussion of potentials, is the treatment of non-additive effects, i.e. of the contributions to the interaction energy that derive from three-, four-body terms and so on. 

Compared with the classical supermolecular approach where three- or four-body terms are explicitly taken into account, this procedure offers remarkable computational advantages, as the computational times for the potential of A or B in the PCM are only slightly larger than in vacuo. 

Application of the three and four atom HYBO functional form to the formulation of th( interaction of larger systems is not straightforward. Howc ver, since the MBE expansion of the interaction of large systems is, in general, truncated to the four body terms one can easily assemble the related force field by composing related HYBO three and four atom blocks. 

As pointed out earlier, k in Eq. (154) cannot exceed 6 if T is approximated by its mono- and doubly excited components. Furthermore, we do not have to consider higher-than-four-body components of Hn,open at the CCSD level of the EOMXCC formalism. In fact, the only three- and four-body terms that we need in the EE-EOMXCCSD scheme are H and Hq, where P is defined by Eq. (134). These observations simplify our analysis, since very few three- and four-body contributions enter the projected Hamiltonian components H and Hf. In addition, many terms that enter Hz and Hq appear in higher orders of MBPT and can be neglected. 

Interestingly enough, seven out of ten skeletons that correspond to the (EjvT3) contributions are included in one- and two-body terms H%(T, T2). Thus, at least statistically, a significant portion of the (V)vT3) triples effect may already be described by the PE-12 method, which uses only one- and two-body components of H. We do not need the four-body term Hf (T, T2), Eq. (171), in the EOMXCCSD Hamiltonian to describe these T3 contributions of the EOMCCSDT theory. We can thus ignore this term altogether. On the other hand, the most expensive term in (Tl,T2) scales as n n4 (nD is the number of occupied orbitals and nu is the number of unoccupied orbitals), so that inclusion of Hf (T, T2) is no more expensive than the standard CCSD calculation (see Appendix B for the details). 

The EOMCCSD method uses up to three-body terms of H. The EOMXCCSD approach needs certain types of three- and four-body components of H as well as all one- and two-body terms. Although the presence of four-body terms in the EOMXCCSD approach makes this approach slightly more complicated compared to EOMCCSD, the four-body terms of H that enter the EOMXCCSD eigenvalue problem are inexpensive (they scale as or less) and we may also think of eliminating them altogether, since they do not bring any information about T3 components of EOMCC. 

The four-body term is an application of exactly the ideas introduced in section 4.5.3 and culminating in eqn (4.95). Fig. 9.32 shows the relative contributions of different atoms in the faulted region to the overall fault energy. In particular, for a series of different metals the overall contribution to the stacking fault energy is decomposed layer by layer and each such contribution is itself decomposed into the relative contributions of the pair and four-body terms. 

To obtain the accuracy required for a realistic analysis of the structure and dynamics of macromolecules it is necessary to use a relatively complex form for the empirical potential function and to optimize the values of the parameters that determine the magnitudes of the different contributing terms. In general, the function will have terms that depend not only on the relative position of all pairs of atoms but certain triples and quadruples of atoms as well. Usually, one does not need to go beyond four-body terms in the model potential function. This approach to calculating energies is often referred to as molecular mechanics.6061... 

In many cases, it is reasonable to expect that the sum of two-body interactions will be much greater than the sum of the three-body terms which in turn will be greater than the sum of the four-body terms and so on. Retaining only the two-body terms in equation IAI. 5.3) is called the pairwise additivity approximation. This approximation is quite good so the bulk of our attention can be focused on describing the two-body interactions. However, it is now known that the many-body terms cannot be neglected altogether, and they are considered briefly in section A 1.5.2.6 and section A 1.5.3.5. 

At low temperatures the shape of the chain is determined by the sign of first term in (C2.5.A18). If the sign is negative then the positive four-body term is required for a stable theory. 

Can one specify precisely the entire class of intermolecular potentials for which the four-body term in the density expansion of the kinetic equation is divergent in three dimensions, or the three-body term in two dimensions ... 

The method has been applied to vinyl bromide and silicon clusters. For Sis clusters a truncation after the three-body term has been found to be sufficient. The employed NN is shown schematically in Fig. 6. Like the HDMR method this approach is not constrained to a fixed system size and Si clusters with 3 to 7 atoms have also been fitted. For each A-body term all interatomic distances are used as input vector without an explicit incorporation of the symmetry. For the vinyl bromide molecule the energy has been expressed using five two-body terms, six three-body terms, and five four-body terms. Still, in applications to larger systems the efficiency of the method is low because of the large number of interactions, which have to be evaluated by NNs. 

---