Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Formation, sites

The WGS reaction is a reversible reaction, that is, it attains equilibrium with reverse WGS reaction. Thus the fact that the WGS reaction is promoted by H20(a reactant), in turn, implies that the reverse WGS reaction may also be promoted by a reactant, H2 or CO2. In fact the decomposition of the surface formates produced from H2+CO2 is promoted 8-10 times by gas-phase hydrogen. The WGS and reverse WGS reactions can conceivably proceed on different formate sites of the ZnO surface unlike usual catalytic reaction kinetics, while the occurrence of the reactant-promoted reactions does not violate the principle of microscopic reversibility[63]. [Pg.30]

The Diels-Alder reaction is a powerful synthetic process for constructing complex molecules. The reaction has been extensively studied and refined since its discovery in 1928.1 The most attractive feature of the Diels-Alder reaction is its simultaneous, regioselective construction of two bonds, resulting in the creation of up to four chiral centers with largely predictable relative stereochemistry at the bond formation sites. Theoretically, there are a total of 24 = 16 stereoisomers when atoms marked with an asterisk are all chiral centers (Scheme 5-1) therefore, the complete control of the reaction process to obtain enantiomeri-cally pure products has been the object of active research in many laboratories. [Pg.267]

The WGS reaction is a reversible reaction that is, the WGS reaction attains equilibrium with the reverse WGS reaction. Thus, the fact that the WGS reaction is promoted by H20 (a reactant), in turn implies that the reverse WGS reaction may also be promoted by a reactant, H2 or C02. In fact, the decomposition of the surface formates produced from H2+C02 was promoted 8-10 times by gas-phase hydrogen. The WGS and reverse WGS reactions conceivably proceed on different formate sites of the ZnO surface unlike usual catalytic reaction kinetics, while the occurrence of the reactant-promoted reactions does not violate the principle of microscopic reversibility. The activation energy for the decomposition of the formates (produced from H20+CO) in vacuum is 155 kJ/mol, and the activation energy for the decomposition of the formates (produced from H2+C02) in vacuum is 171 kJ/mol. The selectivity for the decomposition of the formates produced from H20+ CO at 533 K is 74% for H20 + CO and 26% for H2+C02, while the selectivity for the decomposition of the formates produced from H2+C02 at 533 K is 71% for H2+C02 and 29% for H20+C0 as shown in Scheme 8.3. The drastic difference in selectivity is not presently understood. It is clear, however, that this should not be ascribed to the difference of the bonding feature in the zinc formate species because v(CH), vav(OCO), and v/OCO) for both bidentate formates produced from H20+C0 and H2+C02 show nearly the same frequencies. Note that the origin (HzO+CO or H2+C02) from which the formate is produced is remembered as a main decomposition path under vacuum, while the origin is forgotten by coadsorbed H20. [Pg.235]

The above suite of hydrate sensing tools (thermodynamics, geothermal gradients, kinetics, BSRs, lithology and fluid flow, logging and coring tools, and subsea tools) has enabled an assessment of where hydrates may exist worldwide. On the basis of the data provided by these tools, hydrate formation models such as that of Klauda and Sandler (2005) enable our prediction of hydrate formation sites in nature—notably the a priori prediction of 68 of the 71 sites at which hydrates have been indicated. [Pg.582]

Recent work at the University of New Orleans has focused on methods of bringing pollutants and hydroxyl radical together to improve selectivity and to enhance the rate and efficiency of pollutant degradation. As previously discussed, sorption of pollutants into hydrophobic sites substantially inhibits their degradation because hydroxyl radicals are less likely to penetrate into these sites. Because the catalyst for hydroxyl radical formation (Fe2+) is hydrophilic, it is unlikely that the pollutant will be near the formation site of... [Pg.197]

Cavitation corrosion occurs in pumps that have flow conditions that allow bubble formation on the surface of impellers. These bubbles, upon formation, break with enough force to rupture the protective film of the stainless steel. Plants can prevent this by designing a system that avoids bubble formation (i.e., provide sufficient Net Positive Suction Head - NPSH - for the pump), by polishing rotating parts to remove bubble formation sites and by using alloys with greater corrosion resistance and strength88. [Pg.210]

It should be noted diat the detachment of a pendant drop causes a disturbance at die bottom of die tube, which generates waves on die film above and to die side. At die moment die bridge breaks, the liquid remaining attached to the tube is typically shaped like a stretched triangle. The surface tension forces at the tip of diis shape furthest from the tube are very high and cause fast recoil of die liquid, which in turn leads to ripples diat propagate up the tube. These waves can disturb die formation of neighboring droplets and cause some side-to-side motion of droplet formation sites. [Pg.355]

The extracellular space ofthe brain can be divided into two major compartments, the CSF and the interstitial fluid (ISF). The CSF and the ISF are separated from the blood by the choroid plexus or the BCS FB and the brain capillary or BBB, respectively. No anatomical barrier exists between the CSF and the ISF a functional barrier is built up by the flow of CSF from its formation site (choroid plexus) to its absorption site (arachnoid villi) [15]. In the case of a human brain, 20 ml CSF is produced per hour and the complete turnover ofthe total 100 ml CS F occurs approximately within 4—5 h, whereas only 2 ml ISF is renewed per hour compared to the total amount of 300 ml ISF [17, 18]. Neurons are bathed by the extracellular (or interstitial) fluid of the brain (ECF = ISF) that forms the microenvironment ofthe CNS [19]. ISF and CSF are low-protein fluids (plasma CSF ratio 260) due to the tightness of the CNS barrier layers [20] furthermore, the brain has no true lymph or lymphatics. [Pg.264]

A. In the RBC a deficiency of pyruvate kinase wonld tend to shunt glucose toward the hexose monophosphate pathway increasing ribu-lose 5-P levels, and the ratio of NADP+ to NADPH wonld decrease. NADH to NAD+ ratios wonld increase as a resnlt of lower pyruvate levels making more NADH available to rednce methemoglobin and regenerate NAD+. Becanse pyravate kinase is deficient, the last ATP formation site is compromised, and so is the formation of ATP in the RBC elevating the ADP to ATP ratio. [Pg.216]

The crucial distinction between supernovae of types la and Ib/c is that the latter occur near star formation sites and have never been observed in giant elliptical galaxies. Consequently they are associated with core-collapse explosions in massive or intermediate mass stars which have already lost their hydrogen envelopes. Possible candidates include Wolf-Rayet stars and hydrogen-deficient binaries [126,129]. [Pg.88]

W. Lee, T. Oshikiri, K. Saito, K. Sugita and T. Sugo, Comparison of Formation Site of Graft Chain between Nonporous and Porous Films Prepared by RIGP, Chem. Mater., 8 (1996) 2618. [Pg.700]

As it is well-known [12], fractal objects are characterized by strong screening of internal regions by fractal surface. Therefore accessible for reaction (in our case - for branching formation) sites are either on fractal (macromolecular coil) surface, or near it. Such sites ntrmber is scaled with coil gyration radius R as follows [12] ... [Pg.203]

Therefore, it can be assumed, that the number of accessible for branching formation sites of macromolecular coil m will be proportional to the product pN or[l] ... [Pg.204]

Polymerization kinetics propagation, transfer, LCB formation, site activation and deactivation Microstructure formation MWD, CCD, LCB Chain crystallization... [Pg.55]


See other pages where Formation, sites is mentioned: [Pg.68]    [Pg.466]    [Pg.220]    [Pg.220]    [Pg.243]    [Pg.47]    [Pg.381]    [Pg.46]    [Pg.145]    [Pg.119]    [Pg.198]    [Pg.47]    [Pg.306]    [Pg.231]    [Pg.353]    [Pg.355]    [Pg.359]    [Pg.77]    [Pg.201]    [Pg.706]    [Pg.163]    [Pg.77]    [Pg.398]    [Pg.127]    [Pg.386]    [Pg.675]    [Pg.19]    [Pg.338]    [Pg.1470]    [Pg.387]    [Pg.852]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.287 ]




SEARCH



Abasic site formation

Active pair sites, possible formation

Active site formation

Antigen-binding site formation

Electron Transfer Is Coupled to ATP Formation at Three Sites

Formate dehydrogenase active site

Formate dehydrogenase active site structure

Formation of Active Sites by Ion Exchange

Formation of Edge Sites on Montmorillonite

Formation of edge sites

Heavy chain antigen-binding site formation

Iron site, formation, ribonucleotide reductase

Light chain antigen-binding site formation

Methoxy formation, site

Molecular interactions binding site formation

Precursor complex formation oxide surface sites

Site formation processes

Site of Formation

Structure formation bonding sites

Surface sites complex formation

The Site of Formation

© 2024 chempedia.info