Food-effect studies timing

Food-effect studies are necessary for all multisource modified-release formulations to ensure the absence of dose dumping . The latter signals a formulation failure such that the dose is released all at once rather than over an extended period of time. This results in a premature and abrupt rise in the plasma concentration time profile. A high-fat meal often provides a maximal challenge to the robustness of release from the formulation with respect to prandial state. The composition of the meal should also take local diet and custom into consideration (see also section 6.2.4). 

Pharmacokinetic concentration-time curves for a drug and ifs mefabolifes are used to identify primary exposure metrics such as AUC, or which are not time-dependent unlike the sequential measurements of concentration over time. A peak plasma concentration of a drug is often associated with a PD response, especially with an adverse event. There can be large inter-individual variability in the time-to-peak concentration, and closely spaced sampling times are often critical to determining the peak plasma concentration accurately in individual patients because of differences in demographics, disease states, and food effects, if any. All these elements are clearly spelled out in the protocols written to conduct these studies. 

This type of hADME study will always have an explorative character, and typically comprises less than the normal minimum of 12 subjects for a PK study. If the compound is expected to show different and unpredictable ADME characteristics in special populations, then it might be necessary to include these populations in addition to normal, healthy subjects. Or, if other conditions might influence ADME in an unpredictable manner (e.g. food effects), then it might even be necessary to run the study in a cross-over design. The inclusion of females (being not of childbearing potential) was discussed several times, but it seems to be a rare exception for hADME studies. 

NPY-treated animals have been reported to show strong preference for carbohydrate when pure macronutrient diets are available, with little or no effect on fat or protein intake (Stanley etal., 1985b Tempel and Leibowitz, 1990). This had led to the suggestion that NPY may be involved in mediating the consumption of carbohydrate, which is the macronutrient of choice at the start of the active feeding period in rats (Tempel et al., 1989). Indeed, peak levels of NPY are detected in the hypothalamus at this time (Jhanwar Uniyal et al., 1990 McKibbin et al., 1991b). Others have failed to reproduce this carbohydrate selection in food preference studies, and it is possible that palatability and caloric content of diets may account for reported effects on macronutrient selection. 

Real proof of efficacy and safety comes from large, expensive Phase III trials. These usually involve up to several thousand patients at multiple sites around the world. These too are likely to be double-blind randomized controlled studies. By the time they re over, all the types of information—dosage, indication, efficacy, PK (including food effects, which can affect bioavailability), metabohsm, side effects, etc.—required for a package insert or product label (and hopefully one that fits with the original TPP) will be available from the combined trials. 

Aluminum Foil. Studies of various foods wrapped in aluminum foil show that food products to which aluminum offers only fair resistance cause little or no corrosion when the foil is in contact with a nonmetallic object (glass, plastic, ceramic, etc.) The reactions, when found, are essentially chemical, and the effect on the foil is insignificant. However, when the same foods are wrapped or covered with foil that is in contact with another metallic object (steel, tinplate, silver, etc.), an electrochemical or galvanic reaction occurs with aluminum acting as the sacrificial anode. In such cases, there is pitting corrosion of the foil, and the severity of the attack depends primarily on the food composition and the exposure time and temperature. Results obtained with various foods cov-... 

The human impact on the environment affects many areas of our lives and future. One example is the effect of acid rain on biodiversity, the diversity of living things. In the prairies that extend across the heartlands of North America and Asia, native plants have evolved that can survive even nitrogen-poor soil and drought. By studying prairie plants, scientists hope to breed food plants that will be hardy sources of food in times of drought. However, acid rain is making some of these plants extinct. 

---