Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Fock transformation

The Fock transformation of variables consists in projecting the momentum vector p with coordinates Px, py, pz and modulus p in momentum space on a tetradimensional hypersphere of unit radius. The momentum pq = V-2E is directly related to the energy spectrum. A point on the hypersphere surface has coordinates ... [Pg.292]

Here is the generalized Laplacian operator, Z is a constant, and R is the hyperradius. In the D-dimensional case, the Fock transformation... [Pg.154]

E. For the reciprocal-space solutions, ko represents the radius of the hypersphere onto which momentum-space is mapped by the generalized Fock transformation (equation (89)). As we saw above, the momentum-space wave functions are proportional to hyperspheri-cal harmonics on the surface of this hypersphere. The hyperspherical harmonics form a complete set, in the sense that any well-behaved function of the hyperangles can be expanded in terms of them. A set of hydrogenlike wave functions, all corresponding to the same value of ko (but with variable Z) is called a Sturmian basis [33-38,24] and such a basis set has the degree of completeness just mentioned. However, if Z is held constant while ko is variable within the set, then the continumn functions are required for completeness. [Pg.157]

In the further manipulations the site representation will be used for convenience. The Fourier transform with respect to time of a single-exciton retarded Green s function (t) of a system under the Hamiltonian in the site representation for exciton coordinates and Fock s representation for phonon coordinates is written as... [Pg.446]

I he Fock matrix must next be transformed to F by pre- and post-multiplying by... [Pg.83]

The sum over eoulomb and exehange interaetions in the Foek operator runs only over those spin-orbitals that are oeeupied in the trial F. Beeause a unitary transformation among the orbitals that appear in F leaves the determinant unehanged (this is a property of determinants- det (UA) = det (U) det (A) = 1 det (A), if U is a unitary matrix), it is possible to ehoose sueh a unitary transformation to make the 8i j matrix diagonal. Upon so doing, one is left with the so-ealled canonical Hartree-Fock equations ... [Pg.461]

In standard quantum-mechanical molecular structure calculations, we normally work with a set of nuclear-centred atomic orbitals Xi< Xi CTOs are a good choice for the if only because of the ease of integral evaluation. Procedures such as HF-LCAO then express the molecular electronic wavefunction in terms of these basis functions and at first sight the resulting HF-LCAO orbitals are delocalized over regions of molecules. It is often thought desirable to have a simple ab initio method that can correlate with chemical concepts such as bonds, lone pairs and inner shells. A theorem due to Fock (1930) enables one to transform the HF-LCAOs into localized orbitals that often have the desired spatial properties. [Pg.302]

So far there have not been any restrictions on the MOs used to build the determinantal trial wave function. The Slater determinant has been written in terms of spinorbitals, eq. (3.20), being products of a spatial orbital times a spin function (a or /3). If there are no restrictions on the form of the spatial orbitals, the trial function is an Unrestricted Hartree-Fock (UHF) wave function. The term Different Orbitals for Different Spins (DODS) is also sometimes used. If the interest is in systems with an even number of electrons and a singlet type of wave function (a closed shell system), the restriction that each spatial orbital should have two electrons, one with a and one with /3 spin, is normally made. Such wave functions are known as Restricted Hartree-Fock (RHF). Open-shell systems may also be described by restricted type wave functions, where the spatial part of the doubly occupied orbitals is forced to be the same this is known as Restricted Open-shell Hartree-Fock (ROHF). For open-shell species a UHF treatment leads to well-defined orbital energies, which may be interpreted as ionization potentials. Section 3.4. For an ROHF wave function it is not possible to chose a unitary transformation which makes the matrix of Lagrange multipliers in eq. (3.40) diagonal, and orbital energies from an ROHF wave function are consequently not uniquely defined, and cannot be equated to ionization potentials by a Koopman type argument. [Pg.70]

The gradient of the energy is an off-diagonal element of the molecular Fock matrix, which is easily calculated from the atomic Fock matrix. The second derivative, however, involves two-electron integrals which require an AO to MO transformation (see Section 4.2.1), and is therefore computationally expensive. [Pg.74]

For computational purposes it is convenient to work with canonical MOs, i.e. those which make the matrix of Lagrange multipliers diagonal, and which are eigenfunctions of the Fock operator at convergence (eq, (3.41)). This corresponds to a specific choice of a unitary transformation of the occupied MOs. Once the SCF procedure has converged, however, we may chose other sets of orbitals by forming linear combinations of the canonical MOs. The total wave function, and thus all observable properties, are independent of such a rotation of the MOs. [Pg.227]

Schrodinger amplitude relation to Klein-Gordon amplitude, 500 Schrodinger equation, 439 adiabatic solutions, 414 as a unitary transformation, 481 for relativistic spin % particle, 538 for the component a, 410 in Fock representation, 459 in the q representation, 492 Schrodinger form of one-photon equation, 548... [Pg.782]

It is also of interest to study the "inverse" problem. If something is known about the symmetry properties of the density or the (first order) density matrix, what can be said about the symmetry properties of the corresponding wave functions In a one electron problem the effective Hamiltonian is constructed either from the density [in density functional theories] or from the full first order density matrix [in Hartree-Fock type theories]. If the density or density matrix is invariant under all the operations of a space CToup, the effective one electron Hamiltonian commutes with all those elements. Consequently the eigenfunctions of the Hamiltonian transform under these operations according to the irreducible representations of the space group. We have a scheme which is selfconsistent with respect to symmetty. [Pg.134]

Tsoucaris, decided to treat by Fourier transformation, not the Schrodinger equation itself, but one of its most popular approximate forms for electron systems, namely the Hartree-Fock equations. The form of these equations was known before, in connection with electron-scattering problems [13], but their advantage for Quantum Chemistry calculations was not yet recognized. [Pg.141]

The Fourier transformation method enables us to immediately write the momentum space equations as soon as the SCF theory used to describe the system under consideration allows us to build one or several effective Fock Hamiltonians for the orbitals to be determined. This includes a rather large variety of situations ... [Pg.141]

From equations (33) and (35), a general HPHF Fock operator for determining the a, orbitals of excited states can be extracted after some straightforward transformations ... [Pg.181]

All three states were described by a single set of SCF molecular orbitals based on the occupied canonical orbitals of the X Z- state and a transformation of the canonical virtual space known as "K-orbitals" [10] which, among other properties, approximate the set of natural orbitals. Transition moments within orthogonal basis functions are easier to derive. For the X state the composition of the reference space was obtained by performing two Hartree-Fock single and double excitations (HFSD-CI) calculations at two typical intemuclear distances, i.e. R. (equilibrium geometry) and about 3Re,and adding to the HF... [Pg.320]

The main idea of TFD is the following (Santana, 2004) for a given Hamiltonian which is written in terms of annihilation and creation operators, one applies a doubling procedure which implies extending the Fock space, formally written as Ht = H H. The physical variables are described by the non-tilde operators. In a second step, a Bogolyubov transformation is applied which introduces a rotation of the tilde and non-tilde variables and transforms the non-thermal variables into temperature-dependent form. This formalism can be applied to quite a large class of systems whose Hamiltonian operators can be represented in terms of annihilation and creation operators. [Pg.326]

FM at some density 1. One of the essential points we learned here is that we need no spin-dependent interaction at the original Lagrangian to see SSP. We can see a similar phenomenon in dealing with nuclear matter within the relativistic mean-field theory, where the Fock interaction can be extracted by way of the Fierz transformation from the original Lagrangian [11],... [Pg.244]

If we understand FM or magnetic properties of quark matter more deeply, we must proceeds to a self-consistent approach, like Hartree-Fock theory, beyond the previous perturbative argument. In ref. [11] we have described how the axial-vector mean field (AV) and the tensor one appear as a consequence of the Fierz transformation within the relativistic mean-field theory for nuclear matter, which is one of the nonperturbative frameworks in many-body theories and corresponds to the Hatree-Fock approximation. We also demonstrated... [Pg.245]

In this talk we have discussed a magnetic aspect of quark matter based on QCD. First, we have introduced ferromagnetism (FM) in QCD, where the Fock exchange interaction plays an important role. Presence of the axial-vector mean-field (AV) after the Fierz transformation is essential to give rise to FM, in the context of self-consistent framework. As one of the features of the relativistic FM, we have seen that the Fermi sea is deformed in the presence of... [Pg.258]

Thus, the Fock-operator is also invariant under the orbital transformations given by Eqs. (5) and (6). [Pg.38]


See other pages where Fock transformation is mentioned: [Pg.148]    [Pg.148]    [Pg.148]    [Pg.148]    [Pg.74]    [Pg.136]    [Pg.647]    [Pg.69]    [Pg.105]    [Pg.56]    [Pg.225]    [Pg.231]    [Pg.759]    [Pg.56]    [Pg.140]    [Pg.142]    [Pg.143]    [Pg.141]    [Pg.253]    [Pg.110]    [Pg.18]    [Pg.315]    [Pg.316]    [Pg.138]    [Pg.218]    [Pg.3]    [Pg.249]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.140 , Pg.152 , Pg.154 ]




SEARCH



© 2024 chempedia.info