Fluidic methods

Conventional radiochemical analysis of nuclear process or waste samples in the laboratory entails three primary activities sample preparation, radiochemical separation, and detection. Each of these activities may entail multiple steps. The automated fluidic methods described above, typically also carried out in the laboratory, link separation and detection. Sample preparation has, in many cases, been carried out first by manual laboratory methods. 

A method of detecting herbicides is proposed the photosynthetic herbicides act by binding to Photosystem II (PS II), a multiunit chlorophyll-protein complex which plays a vital role in photosynthesis. The inhibition of PS II causes a reduced photoinduced production of hydrogen peroxide, which can be measured by a chemiluminescence reaction with luminol and the enzyme horseradish peroxidase (HRP). The sensing device proposed combines the production and detection of hydrogen peroxide in a single flow assay by combining all the individual steps in a compact, portable device that utilises micro-fluidic components. 

One of the most frequently used micro reactor types relies on the use of micro-structured platelets with multiple parallel channels, typically manufactured by methods other than routinely used for chip processing, encased in a housing [3,4, 12, 13, 18, 28-39]. If more than one platelet is used, which is usually done to increase throughput, a stack-like arrangement is preferred for parallel feed. Such stacks are either welded directly from the outside [29, 30], are encompassed by a cover [3,18, 31, 32, 37-39], have end caps with fluidic connectors [12,13, 33] or are inserted into a recess of a housing, which is typically composed of two parts [4, 28, 34-36, 40 1]. 

In this method, NWs can be aligned by passing a suspension of NWs through microfluidic channel structures, for example, formed between a poly(dimethylsiloxane) (PDMS) mold 49 and a flat substrate (Fig. 11.3a). Images of NWs assembled on substrate surfaces (Fig. 11.3b) within micro-fluidic flows demonstrate that virtually all NWs are aligned along the flow direction. This alignment readily extends over hundreds of micrometers, and... 

The need for improved sensor performance has led to the emergence of micro and nanofluidics. These fields seek to develop miniaturized analysis systems that combine the desired attributes in a compact and cost-effective setting. These platforms are commonly labeled as labs-on-chip or micro total analysis systems (pTAS)2, often using optical methods to realize a desired functionality. The preeminent role that optics play has recently led to the notion of optofluidics as an independent field that deals with devices and methods in which optics and fluidics enable each other3. Most of the initial lab-on-chip advances, however, occurred in the area of fluidics, while the optical components continued to consist largely of bulk components such as polarizers, filters, lenses, and objectives. 

Laboratory robotics represents an attractive approach for the automation of sample preparation and separation steps in radiochemical analysis, and for many years, such methods have been routinely used by laboratories serving the analytical needs of the International Atomic Energy Association.64 68-72 However, there are currently a limited number of published studies containing technical details on the radiochemical separations and how they were automated. Accordingly, the remainder of this chapter will focus on fluidic approaches. 

By the late 1990s and into the 2000s, a number of additional groups became involved in automated fluidic separations for radiochemical analysis, especially as a front end for ICP-MS. Published journal articles on fluidic separations for radio-metric or mass spectrometric detection are summarized in Tables 9.1 through 9.5. The majority of such studies have used extraction chromatographic separations, and these will be the main focus of the remainder of this chapter. Section 9.4 describes methods that combine separation and detection. Section 9.5 describes a fully automated system that combines sample preparation, separation, and detection. 

Process monitoring poses two additional challenges compared to these automated fluidic separation methods. First, methodology for automated sample preparation must be developed, and second, the entire sample preparation-separation-detection system must be developed to operate on-line or at-site under unattended computer control, including sample transport through all the steps. Sample preparation is particularly critical for nuclear-waste and nuclear-process streams due to the complexity of the sample matrix and the uncontrolled valence states of several of the potential analytes. 

The development of solvent-impregnated resins and extraction-chromatographic procedures has enabled the automation of radiochemical separations for analytical radionuclide determinations. These separations provide preconcentration from simple matrices like groundwater and separation from complex matrixes such as dissolved sediments, dissolved spent fuel, or nuclear-waste materials. Most of the published work has been carried out using fluidic systems to couple column-based separations to on-line detection, but robotic methods also appear to be very promising. Many approaches to fluidic automation have been used, from individual FI and SI systems to commercial FI sample-introduction systems for atomic spectroscopies. 

Sample injection in NCE is very important for reproducible results with low limits of detection. In spite of some development in NCE very little effort has been made to develop sample injection devices in this technique. Of course sample injection in NCE is a challenging job due to small volume requirement [87], The controlled injection of small amounts of sample is a prerequisite for successful analysis in NCE. Electrokinetic injection (based on electroosmotic flow) is the preferred method and Jacobson et al. [88] optimized sample injection using this approach. Pinched injection allowing injection in minute quantities [89,90] and double-T shaped fluidic channels [91] have also been used for this purpose. Furthermore, Jacobson et al. [92] used a single high voltage source to simplify instrumentation. Similarly Zhang and Manz [93] developed a narrow sample channel injector to improve... 

Flow switches using fluidics in small Reynolds number are fabricated. The principle of the flow switch is shown in Fig. 4 [21]. Mixing of the sample stream and carrier liquid is negligible when the contact area is small and the contact time within subsecond range. The width of the sample stream is controlled by two carrier flows. This structure can be applied for a valveless sample injection in FIA and for sorting of particles and living cells in flow cytometry. A flow switch having 5 outlets has also been obtained by this method. 

Horiuchi, T., Ueno, Y., Niwa, O., Micro-fluidic device for detection and identification of aromatic VOCs by optical method. Micro Total Analysis Systems, Proceedings 5th pTAS1 Symposium, Monterey, CA, Oct. 21-25, 2001, 527-528. 

---