Floating-point errors

You should read Technical Support Note TS-230 Dealing with Numeric Representation Error in SAS Applications to learn more about SAS floating-point numbers and storage precision in SAS. Another good resource for rounding issues is Ron Cody s SAS Functions by Example (SAS Press, 2004). In short, whenever you perform comparisons on numbers that are not integers, you should consider using the ROUND function. 

While attempting to run this simulation in Micro-Cap, the following error was generated Floating point Pow (0,-1.1376) Domain Error. This was traced to the use of the SPICE-compatible VALUE statement in an E element. The value statement is used to model equations dependent on other nodes or currents. The statement in question used the form X" - Y. This was acceptable to IsSpice and PSpice, but not to Micro-Cap. This statement was rewritten in the equivalent form 1 / (X Y), which was accepted without error. 

Solving the matrix equation Ax = b by LU decomposition or by Gaussian elimination you perform a number of operations on the coefficient matrix (and also on the right-hand side vector in the latter case). The precisian in each step is constrained by the precision of your computer s floating-point word that can deal with numbers within certain range. Thus each operation will introduce some round-off error into your results, and you end up with same... 

Give a crude estimate of the relative errors of the columns of H floating-point numbers are stored to 7 digits. 

A(n) implies the truncation error in this formula is proportional to AtN. This method only requires storage for XN, XN-U and f(XN, t N). However, Eq. (A.4) can contribute machine-rounding errors to VN if At and the floating point word length of XN and XN-x are small. Verlet used a CDC... 

In order to evaluate this equation, we need a value for cfe. Kontro, et al. [Kontro et al., 1992] used the Probability Distribution Function (PDF) of floating point roundoff error in multiplication ... 

The parameter eg is a small positive number such as 10-8. A reasonable choice is around the order of the square root of machine precision, em, defined as the smallest number x such that the floating point value of (1 + x) is greater than the floating representation of 1. This precision-dependent (i.e., double versus single) and machine-dependent quantity is approximately the value of the unit roundoff, or 2 ( +D for binary computer arithmetic involving t binary digits (or bits) in the fractional part of the number. For example, for double-precision computations on a DEC VAX, t = 52 and m 10 16. As computational errors will enter from sources other than finite arithmetic, a suitable eg is then a number greater than or equal to 10 8. 

Magnitude is the final limit. It s the culprit in OVERFLOW errors. The operating system stores floating-point numbers in five bytes. What happens when all the bytes fill up The number is a little beyond 10 to the thirty-eighth power, a one followed by 38 zeros the computer cannot count any higher. 

In order to deal with roundoff errors due to the use of SP floating-point numbers on the GPU, Yasuda introduced a scheme in which the XC potential is approximated with a model potential // del which is chosen such that its matrix elements can be calculated analytically. This is done in DP on the CPU while the GPU is used for calculating the correction, that is, for the numerical quadrature of the matrix elements of Ai xc = Without the model potential, errors... 

Both preconditioners are normally very robust and efficient, but the ILU-preconditioner can introduce small numerical perturbations due to floating point round-off error. Thus, simulations of symmetric problems may give non-symmetric results after some time. For this reason the Jacobi preconditioner is recommended. 

As the dimension of the blocks of the Hessian matrix increases, it becomes more efficient to solve for the wavefunction corrections using iterative methods instead of direct methods. The most useful of these methods require a series of matrix-vector products. Since a square matrix-vector product may be computed in 2N arithmetic operations (where N is the matrix dimension), an iterative solution that requires only a few of these products is more efficient than a direct solution (which requires approximately floating-point operations). The most stable of these methods expand the solution vector in a subspace of trial vectors. During each iteration of this procedure, the dimension of this subspace is increased until some measure of the error indicates that sufficient accuracy has been achieved. Such iterative methods for both linear equations and matrix eigenvalue equations have been discussed in the literature . 

Notice that the error has been decreased by adding just one wavelength to the analysis scheme. With higher floating point precision, the result could be even further improved. Therefore, multiwavelength spectrometry can be a powerful alternative to systems where, for every component, only a single wavelength is applied. 

I, ScSc, and. A comma-separated list of variables can be given, and multiple reduction clauses with different operators can be specified. The order in which the reduction is performed is not defined, so numerical round-off error for floating point reductions can result in slightly different results for multiple runs with the same input data. The consequences of omitting fhe reduction clause in the above example are dire the program will compile without warnings, and regression tests can produce the correct result, but actual production runs could produce an incorrect, nondeterministic result. A bug of this type could be very difficult to find. 

Thus, any real number belonging to the envelopment is a possible representative of the real number which the envelopment represents. The effect of envelopment is modelling the propagation of error in numerical calculation in floating point Vaccaro (2001). 

It is also important that a method be stable. The concept here is very similar to the notion of stability for the steady state and other asymptotic solutions of our differential equations. If we introduce a small change (error) into the numerical solution at a grid point, we would like that error to decay rather than to grow. Since this behavior will depend on the equation being solved, stability is typically defined with respect to a standard equation like dA/dt = —kA. Unstable methods are generally unsuitable for numerical computation, because even small roundoff errors can cause the calculated solution to explode, that is, to get so large that a floating overflow point error occurs. 

Wf loat-equal Check for exact equality comparison between floating point values. The usage of equal comparator on floats is usually misguided due to the inherent computational errors of floats. 

We will assume that quantization in floating-point arithmetic is performed by rounding. Because of the exponent in floating-point arithmetic, it is the relative error that is important The relative error is defined as... 

For the floating-point roundoff noise case we will consider Eq. (8.67) for N = 4 and then generalize the result to other values of N. The finite-precision output can be written as the exact output plus an error term e n). Thus... 

In order to train a neural controller, a multilayered network with linear activation functions was initially considered. During the training process, a large sum-squared error occurred due to the unbounded nature of the linear activation function that caused a floating point overflow. To avoid the floating point overflow we used the h3rperbolic tangent activation functions in the hidden layers of the network. The network was unable to identify the forward... 

---