Error round-off

The degree of conditioning of a matrix is detennined by the condition number defined as (Fox and Mayei s, 1977) 

A matrix with a large condition number is commonly referred to as ill-conditioned and particularly vulnerable to round-off errors. Special techniques. 

---

One of the advantages of the Verlet integrator is that it is time reversible and symplectic[30, 31, 32]. Reversibility means that in the absence of numerical round off error, if the trajectory is run for many time steps, say nAt, and the velocities are then reversed, the trajectory will retrace its path and after nAt more time steps it will land back where it started. An integrator can be viewed as a mapping from one point in phase apace to another. If this mapping is applied to a measurable point set of states at on(> time, it will... 

The heat capacity can therefore be obtained by keeping a running count of and E during the simulation, from which their expectation values (E ) and (E) can be calculated at the enc of the calculation. Alternatively, if the energies are stored during the simulation then the value of ((E — (E)) ) can be calculated once the simulation has finished. This seconc approach may be more accurate due to round-off errors (E ) and (E) are usually botf large numbers and so there may be a large uncertainty in their difference. 

All numerical computations inevitably involve round-off errors. This error increases as the number of calculations in the solution procedure is increased. Therefore, in practice, successive mesh refinements that increase the number of finite element calculations do not necessarily lead to more accurate solutions. However, one may assume a theoretical situation where the rounding error is eliminated. In this case successive reduction in size of elements in the mesh should improve the accuracy of the finite element solution. Therefore, using a P C" element with sufficient orders of interpolation and continuity, at the limit (i.e. when element dimensions tend to zero), an exact solution should be obtaiiied. This has been shown to be true for linear elliptic problems (Strang and Fix, 1973) where an optimal convergence is achieved if the following conditions are satisfied ... 

Round-off errors. These are the consequence of using a number specified by m correct digits to approximate a number which requires more than m digits for its exacd specification. For example, approximate the irrational number V2 by I.4I4. Such errors are often... 

Because of round off errors, the Regula Falsa method should include a check for excessive iterations. A modified Regula Falsa method is based on the use of a relaxation factor, i.e., a number used to alter the results of one iteration before inserting into the next. (See the section on relaxation methods and Solution of Sets of Simultaneous Linear Equations. )... 

While one is free to think of CA as being nothing more than formal idealizations of partial differential equations, their real power lies in the fact that they represent a large class of exactly computable models since everything is fundamentally discrete, one need never worry about truncations or the slow aciminidatiou of round-off error. Therefore, any dynamical properties observed to be true for such models take on the full strength of theorems [toff77a]. 

In this example, an initial steady-state solution with a = 0 is propagated downstream. At the fourth axial position, the concentration in one cell is increased to 16. This can represent round-off error, a numerical blunder, or the injection of a tracer. Whatever the cause, the magnitude of the upset decreases at downstream points and gradually spreads out due to diffusion in the y-direction. The total quantity of injected material (16 in this case) remains constant. This is how a real system is expected to behave. The solution technique conserves mass and is stable. 

This equation continues to conserve mass but is no longer stable. The original upset grows exponentially in magnitude and oscillates in sign. This marching-ahead scheme is clearly unstable in the presence of small blunders or round-off errors. 

This equation permits one to check the results after using equation 13.1.24 for several increments to make sure that round-off errors are not propagating to an excessive degree. 

Where two columns appear to be inconsistent, round-off errors are responsible for the numerical discrepancy. 

The reader may be surprised to learn that for the selected data the slope using either method computes to a value of 1.93035714285714, while the intercept for both methods of computation have values of 1.51785714285715 (summation notation method) versus 1.51785714285714 for the Miller and Miller cited method (this, however, is the probable result of computational round-off error). 

The performance statistics, the SEE and the correlation coefficient show that including the square term in the fitting function for Anscombe s nonlinear data set gives, as we noted above, essentially a perfect fit. It is clear that the values of the coefficients obtained are the ones he used to generate the data in the first place. The very large /-values of the coefficients are indicative of the fact that we are near to having only computer round-off error as operative in the difference between the data he provided and the values calculated from the polynomial that included the second-degree term. 

Note that we previously16 quoted AGg as -9.6 kcal/mol and as17 -9.3 kcal/mol. These values differ from the present value by 0.4 kcal/mol (apparently a math error) and 0.1 kcal/mol (apparently a round-off error), respectively. 

Ti measurements were performed at 250, 275 and 300 K by inversion-recovery (7r-T-7r/2-5T i) sequences on a JE0L-FX-100 and a Bruker WP-80 spectrometers. On this latter the "repetitive frequency shift" method of Brevard et al. (18) was used, where two systematic instrumental errors (drift, round off errors in FT processing.. .) are uniformly distributed through all data points. The NOE measurements are reproducible within 10-20 %, while the average standard error on the Tj values is of about 5 %. 

For simplicity, we will assume that depth below the sea bottom varies linearly with time. The first step in the calculation consists in removing the long-term drift over the whole period by fitting the data with a parabola and determining a periodogram out of the residuals from this fit. Depth has also been scaled to 1 in order to minimize round-off errors. Applying the method shown above, the best-fit parabola is obtained for... 

---