Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Field sohd surfaces

Forces of Adsorption. Adsorption may be classified as chemisorption or physical adsorption, depending on the nature of the surface forces. In physical adsorption the forces are relatively weak, involving mainly van der Waals (induced dipole—induced dipole) interactions, supplemented in many cases by electrostatic contributions from field gradient—dipole or —quadmpole interactions. By contrast, in chemisorption there is significant electron transfer, equivalent to the formation of a chemical bond between the sorbate and the soHd surface. Such interactions are both stronger and more specific than the forces of physical adsorption and are obviously limited to monolayer coverage. The differences in the general features of physical and chemisorption systems (Table 1) can be understood on the basis of this difference in the nature of the surface forces. [Pg.251]

By studying the properties of polymer layers on soHd surfaces it soon became obvious that not only is the chemical composition of the immobihzed polymer cmcial for the performance of the material, but so is its morphology. This has been recognized in various fields of applications e.g. stabihzation of small particles suspensions by attached polymer brush-type layers [159, 160], control of adhesion [161] or friction [162] and tailored stationary phases for chromatography [163-165]. [Pg.399]

Patermarakis, G., and Moussoutzanis, K. 2002. Sohd surface and field catalysed interface formation of colloidal Al2(SO4)3 during Al anodizing affecting the kinetics and mechanism of development of structure of porous oxides. Journal of Solid State Electrochemistry 6,475 84. [Pg.295]

In the field of adsorption from solution, many discussions and reviews were published about the measurement of the adsorbed amount and the presentation of the corresponding data [14, 45—47]. Adsorption isotherms are the first step of any adsorption study. They are generally determined from the variation of macroscopic quantities which are rigorously measurable far away from the surface (e.g., the concentration of one species, the pressure, and the molar fraction). It is then only possible to compare two states with or without adsorption. The adsorption data are derived from the difference between these two states, which means that only excess quantities are measurable. Adsorption results in the formation of a concentration profile near an interface. Simple representations are often used for this profile, but the real profile is an oscillating function of the distance from the surface [15, 16]. Without adsorption, the concentration should be constant up to the soHd surface. Adsorption modifies the concentration profile of each component as well as the total concentration profile. It must be noted also that when the liquid is a pure component its concentration profile, i.e., its density, is also modified. Experimentally, the concentration can be measured at a large distance from the surface. The surface excess of component i is the... [Pg.290]

Tlie solid provides an extended surface to the reaction or adsoiption to take place. The area provided by the solid is the sum of the exterior and interior ones. Consequently, the sohd surface includes not only the geometrical one as determined from the solid s shape but also the interior surface that is the result of its porous structure. The surface area is expressed as specific surface area in units of mVg. Its value may be from a few mVg up to hundreds of nri/g. In tire case of a porous solid, the interior surface constitutes the greatest percentage of the total surface, and high values of specific surface area may be achieved. Specifically, the specific area of an activated carbon can reach the value of 1500 nri/g. So, the available area for a hydrocarbon to react on 4 g of activated carbon is equal to that of a football field. [Pg.228]

In principle, all ILs can be contacted with a sohd surface and therefore, looking at the tremendous numbers of publications in the field of ILs, exceeding 6700 in the year 2012, it is anticipated that the concept of supported ILs will benefit from this scientific input. ... [Pg.3]

Unfortunately, this approach does not give a deeper insight into a structure of surface films at the molecular level. The theory involves a concept of a certain averaging effects connected with heterogeneity of sohd surfaces. Moreover, molecular interactions are usually described in terms of a mean field approximation. As a consequence, the integral equation approach cannot elucidate many experimental findings. In particular, various phase transitions in adsorbed layers, such as the order-disorder transition, cannot be explained in the fiamework of this theory. [Pg.164]

The immobilizahon of biomolecules on sohd surfaces represents one of the most important problems in the field of bioelectronics and biosensing, where attempts are made to uhlize biomolecules as achve components to assemble novel hybrid devices [192]. In parhcular, the immobilization of enzymes and proteins under conditions that preserve their nahve structure has triggered considerable research efforts, with the layer-by-layer self-assembly method being one of the most promising techniques due to its simplicity, preciseness of layer thickness. [Pg.271]

The second class of atomic manipulations, the perpendicular processes, involves transfer of an adsorbate atom or molecule from the STM tip to the surface or vice versa. The tip is moved toward the surface until the adsorption potential wells on the tip and the surface coalesce, with the result that the adsorbate, which was previously bound either to the tip or the surface, may now be considered to be bound to both. For successful transfer, one of the adsorbate bonds (either with the tip or with the surface, depending on the desired direction of transfer) must be broken. The fate of the adsorbate depends on the nature of its interaction with the tip and the surface, and the materials of the tip and surface. Directional adatom transfer is possible with the apphcation of suitable junction biases. Also, thermally-activated field evaporation of positive or negative ions over the Schottky barrier formed by lowering the potential energy outside a conductor (either the surface or the tip) by the apphcation of an electric field is possible. FIectromigration, the migration of minority elements (ie, impurities, defects) through the bulk soHd under the influence of current flow, is another process by which an atom may be moved between the surface and the tip of an STM. [Pg.204]

The 2eta potential (Fig. 8) is essentially the potential that can be measured at the surface of shear that forms if the sohd was to be moved relative to the surrounding ionic medium. Techniques for the measurement of the 2eta potentials of particles of various si2es are collectively known as electrokinetic potential measurement methods and include microelectrophoresis, streaming potential, sedimentation potential, and electro osmosis (19). A numerical value for 2eta potential from microelectrophoresis can be obtained to a first approximation from equation 2, where Tf = viscosity of the liquid, e = dielectric constant of the medium within the electrical double layer, = electrophoretic velocity, and E = electric field. [Pg.44]

FIG. 16-4 Depictio ns of surface excess F- Top The force field of the sohd concentrates component near the surface the concentration C is low at the surface because of short-range repulsive forces between adsorbate and surface. Bottom Surface excess for an imagined homogeneous surface layer of thickness Axf... [Pg.1503]

The distribution function of the vectors normal to the surfaces,/(x), for the direction of the magnetic field B, in accord with the directions of the crystallographic axis (100) for the P, D, G surfaces, is presented in Fig. 6. The histograms for the P, D, G are practically the same, as they should be the differences between the histograms are of the order of a line width. The accuracy of the numerical results can be judged by comparing the histograms obtained in our calculation with the analytically calculated distribution function for the P, D, G surfaces [29]. The sohd line in Fig. 6(a) represents the result of analytical calculations [35]. [Pg.703]


See other pages where Field sohd surfaces is mentioned: [Pg.251]    [Pg.22]    [Pg.290]    [Pg.889]    [Pg.147]    [Pg.116]    [Pg.255]    [Pg.4850]    [Pg.566]    [Pg.600]    [Pg.924]    [Pg.55]    [Pg.133]    [Pg.66]    [Pg.219]    [Pg.345]    [Pg.345]    [Pg.6255]    [Pg.472]    [Pg.813]    [Pg.662]    [Pg.442]    [Pg.397]    [Pg.402]    [Pg.43]    [Pg.203]    [Pg.390]    [Pg.158]    [Pg.135]    [Pg.101]    [Pg.511]    [Pg.545]    [Pg.22]    [Pg.26]    [Pg.135]    [Pg.138]    [Pg.475]    [Pg.1088]    [Pg.871]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.1024 ]




SEARCH



Field surface

Sohds

© 2024 chempedia.info