Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Field development optimization

OPTS (Optim i/.ed Potentials for Liquid Simulations) is based on a force field developed by the research group of Bill Jorgensen now at Yale University and previously at Purdue University. Like AMBER, the OPLS force field is designed for calculations on proteins an d nucleic acids. It in troduces non bonded in leraclion parameters that have been carefully developed from extensive Monte Carlo liquid sim u lation s of small molecules. These n on-bonded interactions have been added to the bonding interactions of AMBER to produce a new force field that is expected to be better than AMBER at describing simulations w here the solvent isexplic-... [Pg.191]

Pan, Y. and R. N. Home. Multivariate Optimization of Field Development Scheduling and Well-Placement Design. J Petrol Tech 83-86 (December, 1998). [Pg.479]

When these methods are unsuitable, nonlinear methods may be applied. The function local minima and overall computational efficiency. The function (u) is often expensive to compute, so maximum advantage must accrue from each evaluation of it. To this end, numerous methods have been developed. Optimization is a field of ongoing research. No one single method is best for all types of problem. Where (u) is a sum of squares, as we have expressed it, and where derivatives dQ>/dvl are available, the method of Marquardt (1963) and its variants are perhaps best. Other methods may be desirable where constraints are to be applied to the vt, or where (u) cannot be formulated as a sum of... [Pg.32]

It is worth a pause, however, to consider how such models should best be used. Part of the motivation for developing linear scaling models has been to permit QM calculations to be carried out on biomolecules, e.g., proteins or polyiiucleic acids. However, one may legitimately ask whether there is any point in such a calculation, beyond demonstrating that it can be done. Because of the relatively poor fashion with which semiempirical models handle non-bonded interactions, there is every reason to expect that such models would be disastrously bad at predicting biomolecular geometries - or at the very least inferior to the far more efficient force fields developed and optimized for this exact purpose. [Pg.157]

Future developments in the field of optimization will undoubtedly be influenced by recent interest and rapid developments in new technologies— powerful vector and parallel machines. Indeed, their exploitation for algorithm design and solution of grand challenge applications15 16 is expected to bring new advances in the field of computational chemistry, in particular. [Pg.63]

Due to the lack of experimental data available, alternative methods for properly estimation are needed [3]. Such methods include modelling at both the macroscopic and microscopic scales. At the macroscopic scale, the development of theoretical EoS is needed for accurate prediction of properties and phase equilibria calculations. At the molecular level. Molecular Dynamics (MD) and Metropolis Monte Carlo simulations are used for the elucidation of microscopic structure and the prediction of thermodynamic and transport properties. Liu et al. [7] evaluated a series of force fields in their ability to predict properties of CO2-H2O systems and concluded that different force fields produce optimal results in different ranges of temperatures and pressures. [Pg.362]

A numerical technique that has become very popular in the control field for optimization of dynamic problems is the IDP (iterative dynamic programming) technique. For application of the IDP procedure, the dynamic trajectory is divided first into NS piecewise constant discrete trajectories. Then, the Bellman s theory of dynamic programming [175] is used to divide the optimization problem into NS smaller optimization problems, which are solved iteratively backwards from the desired target values to the initial conditions. Both SQP and RSA can be used for optimization of the NS smaller optimization problems. IDP has been used for computation of optimum solutions in different problems for different purposes. For example, it was used to minimize energy consumption and byproduct formation in poly(ethylene terephthalate) processes [ 176]. It was also used to develop optimum feed rate policies for the simultaneous control of copolymer composition and MWDs in emulsion reactions [36, 37]. [Pg.346]

Gibbsite, kaolinite, pyrophyllite MM/MD, cff91 force field Force field development, geometry optimization of clay minerals 124... [Pg.72]

Ivanov MV, Talipov MR, Timerghazin QD (2015) Genetic algorithm optimization of point charges in ftnce field development ehallenges and insights. J Phys Chem A 119 1422—1434... [Pg.51]

Overall, current quantum chemical methods are adequate for many purposes. Improvements in speed and accuracy are ongoing. My personal view is that this does not represent the bottleneck in accurate predictive condensed phase simulations. If one accepts the idea that entirely quantum chemical simulations are not the optimal approach for most problems (and almost certainly not for biological problems), current methods perform well in the context of QM-MM modeling and in producing results for force field development. [Pg.127]


See other pages where Field development optimization is mentioned: [Pg.467]    [Pg.164]    [Pg.16]    [Pg.21]    [Pg.451]    [Pg.45]    [Pg.463]    [Pg.124]    [Pg.569]    [Pg.41]    [Pg.40]    [Pg.145]    [Pg.164]    [Pg.463]    [Pg.209]    [Pg.428]    [Pg.169]    [Pg.314]    [Pg.74]    [Pg.109]    [Pg.164]    [Pg.166]    [Pg.265]    [Pg.51]    [Pg.56]    [Pg.56]    [Pg.1539]    [Pg.223]    [Pg.307]    [Pg.308]    [Pg.208]    [Pg.49]    [Pg.215]    [Pg.84]    [Pg.124]    [Pg.24]    [Pg.42]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.99 ]




SEARCH



Developability optimization

Field development

© 2024 chempedia.info