Feed backward control

As microtechnology in general and particularly microanalysis evolve, more unit operations can be monitored and optimized. Operations such as separations, reactive distillations and extractions vsdH benefit from feed-forward and feed-backward control schemes once the data are available to generate effective models. In the longer term, the challenge of miniaturizing solids handling operations will need to be addressed and assessed as to whether there are benefits to be realized. 

Which inputs to be chosen as the input manipulated variables (for both feed-forward and feed-backward controls). 

Feed forward control/feed backward control (FF/FB) considers dependencies along the process sequence. For example, the layer thickness of the photo resistor after the lithography process can affect the subsequent reactive ion etch process (Ruegsegger et al. 1998). An FF model holds the information, how the reactive ion etch process recipe has to be adjusted for compensation of pho-toresistant thickness. FB can be understood similarly to R2R with the only difference that not the immediately last process step but the setup of another one in the process history is adjusted. 

For assistance in the use of the Adjust and Set objects, the reader is referred to the module HYSYS -> Principles of Flowsheet Simulation Getting Started in HYSYS -> Convergence of Simulation on the multimedia CD-ROM that accompanies this text. As was discussed in the subsection on bidirectional information flow, for all of its subroutines, HYSYS.Plant provides a bidirectional information flow, that is, when product stream variables are specified, the subroutines calculate most of the unknown inlet-stream variables. In CHEMCAD, a control unit, with one inlet stream and one outlet stream (which may be identical to the inlet stream), is placed into the simulation flowsheet using the CONT subroutine. The parameters of the control unit are specified so as to achieve the desired value of a stream variable (or an expression involving stream variables) or an equipment parameter (or an expression involving equipment parameters) by manipulating an equipment parameter or a stream variable. This is the feed-backward mode, which requires that the control unit be placed downstream of the units being simulated. The CONT subroutine also has afeed-forward mode. 

Step 3. Selection of the control structure, whether open-loop, feedback, feed-forward, or a combination of feed-backward and feedforward control is required. 

Variations of the feed and strip flow rates have little effect on the cadmium transport performance the values of individual cadmium mass-transfer coefficients are similar at carrier or strip flow rates variations. Thus, diffusion of cadmium species through the feed and strip aqueous boundary layers does not control the transport rate. The ratecontrolling steps could act as resistances to diffusion of the cadmium species in the carrier solution layers, especially in the membrane pores or the interfacial backward-extraction reaction kinetics. 

Resistance to diffusion in the LM solution layers and membrane pores is not a rate-controlling step, since the overall mass-transfer coefficients on the LM-strip interface of the system are two orders less than that on the feed-LM side. Thus, we can conclude that the interfacial backward-extraction reaction rate is a rate-controlling step of cadmium transport in the system. 

A numerical technique that has become very popular in the control field for optimization of dynamic problems is the IDP (iterative dynamic programming) technique. For application of the IDP procedure, the dynamic trajectory is divided first into NS piecewise constant discrete trajectories. Then, the Bellman s theory of dynamic programming [175] is used to divide the optimization problem into NS smaller optimization problems, which are solved iteratively backwards from the desired target values to the initial conditions. Both SQP and RSA can be used for optimization of the NS smaller optimization problems. IDP has been used for computation of optimum solutions in different problems for different purposes. For example, it was used to minimize energy consumption and byproduct formation in poly(ethylene terephthalate) processes [ 176]. It was also used to develop optimum feed rate policies for the simultaneous control of copolymer composition and MWDs in emulsion reactions [36, 37]. 

This section describes the controls for a triple-effect membrane-cell caustic evaporator. Section 9.3.3.1 explains some of the reasoning behind the selection of the number of effects and the progression of flow of caustic through the evaporators. To illustrate the control systems here, we assume backward feed of the caustic. 

---