Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Factor heat conductivity

Processes in which solids play a rate-determining role have as their principal kinetic factors the existence of chemical potential gradients, and diffusive mass and heat transfer in materials with rigid structures. The atomic structures of the phases involved in any process and their thermodynamic stabilities have important effects on drese properties, since they result from tire distribution of electrons and ions during tire process. In metallic phases it is the diffusive and thermal capacities of the ion cores which are prevalent, the electrons determining the thermal conduction, whereas it is the ionic charge and the valencies of tire species involved in iron-metallic systems which are important in the diffusive and the electronic behaviour of these solids, especially in the case of variable valency ions, while the ions determine the rate of heat conduction. [Pg.148]

Treatment of thermal conductivity inside the catalyst can be done similarly to that for pore diffusion. The major difference is that while diffusion can occur in the pore volume only, heat can be conducted in both the fluid and solid phases. For strongly exothermic reactions and catalysts with poor heat conductivity, the internal overheating of the catalyst is a possibility. This can result in an effectiveness factor larger than unity. [Pg.26]

Temperature rc) Humidity kg HjO/kg dry air) Water vapor partial pressure (kPa) Water v K>r partial density (kg/m ) Water vaporization heat M/kg) Mixture enthalpy (kj/kg dry air) Dry air partial density (lKinematic viscosity (I0< mJ/s) Specific heat (kJ/K kg) Heat conductivity (W/m K) Diffusion factor water air (1 O mJ/s) Temperature rc)... [Pg.82]

For conduction the heat resistance is the distance divided by the heat conductivity, R = 8/X.A, and the heat conductance is heat conductivity divided by distance, U = X.A/8. For convection and radiation the heat resistance is 1 divided by the heat transfer factor, 1/aA, and the heat conductance is the same as the heat transfer factor, U aA. A coefficient of heat flow is also used, the K value, which is the total conductance ... [Pg.107]

The rate of heat conduction is further complicated by the effect of sunshine onto the outside. Solar radiation reaches the earth s surface at a maximum intensity of about 0.9 kW/ m. The amount of this absorbed by a plane surface will depend on the absorption coefficient and the angle at which the radiation strikes. The angle of the sun s rays to a surface (see Figure 26.1) is always changing, so this must be estimated on an hour-to-hour basis. Various methods of reaching an estimate of heat flow are used, and the sol-air temperature (see CIBSE Guide, A5) provides a simplification of the factors involved. This, also, is subject to time lag as the heat passes through the surface. [Pg.264]

Example 3 As a matter of experience, the intention is to use a higher-accuracy scheme similar to (12) being used for the heat conduction equation. As we have stated in Section 1, the factorized scheme... [Pg.572]

An accurate calculation of the heat conductivity requires solving a kinetic equation for the phonons coupled with the multilevel systems, which would account for thermal saturation effects and so on. We encountered one example of such saturation in the expression (21) for the scattering strength by a two-level system, where the factor of tanh((3co/2) reflected the difference between thermal populations of the two states. Neglecting these effects should lead to an error on the order of unity for the thermal frequencies. Within this single relaxation time approximation for each phonon frequency, the Fermi golden rule yields, for the scattering rate of a phonon with Ha kgT,... [Pg.157]

Figure 19. The predicted low T heat conductivity. The no coupling case neglects phonon coupling effects on the ripplon spectrum. The (scaled) experimental data are taken from Smith [112] for a-Si02 (AsTj/ScOd 4.4) and from Freeman and Anderson [19] for polybutadiene (ksTg/Hcao — 2.5). The empirical universal lower T ratio l /l 150 [19], used explicitly here to superimpose our results on the experiment, was predicted by the present theory earlier within a factor of order unity, as explained in Section lllB. The effects of nonuniversaUty due to the phonon coupling are explained in Section IVF. Figure 19. The predicted low T heat conductivity. The no coupling case neglects phonon coupling effects on the ripplon spectrum. The (scaled) experimental data are taken from Smith [112] for a-Si02 (AsTj/ScOd 4.4) and from Freeman and Anderson [19] for polybutadiene (ksTg/Hcao — 2.5). The empirical universal lower T ratio l /l 150 [19], used explicitly here to superimpose our results on the experiment, was predicted by the present theory earlier within a factor of order unity, as explained in Section lllB. The effects of nonuniversaUty due to the phonon coupling are explained in Section IVF.
As the pressure increases from low values, the pressure-dependent term in the denominator of Eq. (101) becomes significant, and the heat transfer is reduced from what is predicted from the free molecular flow heat transfer equation. Physically, this reduction in heat flow is a result of gas-gas collisions interfering with direct energy transfer between the gas molecules and the surfaces. If we use the heat conductivity parameters for water vapor and assume that the energy accommodation coefficient is unity, (aA0/X)dP — 150 I d cm- Thus, at a typical pressure for freeze drying of 0.1 torr, this term is unity at d 0.7 mm. Thus, gas-gas collisions reduce free molecular flow heat transfer by at least a factor of 2 for surfaces separated by less than 1 mm. Most heat transfer processes in freeze drying involve separation distances of at least a few tenths of a millimeter, so transition flow heat transfer is the most important mode of heat transfer through the gas. [Pg.678]

Ts will be by two orders of magnitude lower for a PS foam of a density of 0.02 g/cm than for a solid PS with a density of 1.05 g/cm, while the increases only by a factor of 2.35 and decreases by 15Z. A decrease in the density and heat conductivity due to formation of small pores in the membranes may thus partly offset the simultaneous increase in the effectiveness of the Br in the membrane. [Pg.142]

With both the extreme values 5.9 10 2 respectively 31.8 10 2 kJ/m h °C the term C becomes 59.3 10"3 or 11 10 3 and rMD (5 9) = 9.1 h, respectively fMD (1,8) = 2.5 h. The heat conductivity in the product becomes the decisive value. It is a function of the chamber pressure, but changes in the interesting pressure range of 0.5 mbar to 1 mbar by only 15 %. However it varies with the solid content by a factor of 2 and is dependent on the structure. The A,r of turkey meat parallel to the fiber structure is three times larger than given above. [Pg.67]

The second model, proposed by Frank-Kamenetskii [162], applies to cases of solids and unstirred liquids. This model is often used for liquids in storage. Here, it is assumed that heat is lost by conduction through the material to tire walls (at ambient temperature) where the heat loss is infinite compared to the rate of heat conduction through the material. The thermal conductivity of the material is an important factor for calculations using this model. Shape is also important in this model and different factors are used for slabs, spheres, and cylinders. Case B in Figure 3.20 indicates a typical temperature distribution by the Frank-Kamenetskii model, showing a temperature maximum in the center of the material. [Pg.143]

Fireproofing for the petroleum and related industries follow the same concept as other industries except that the possible fire exposures are more severe in nature. The primary destructive effects of fire in the petroleum industry is very high heat, very rapidly, in the form of radiation, conduction and convection. This causes the immediate collapse of structures made of exposed steel construction. Radiation and convection effects usually heavily outweigh the factor of heat conduction for the... [Pg.164]

The char combustion is sustained by its own heat release. The heat release and heat transport is thereby coupled with the oxygen transport, which is usually the controlling factor. The heat evolved from reaction is transported by heat conduction and convection out of the particle. [73]... [Pg.132]

The spread of the explosion from the decomposed surface layer however depends on thermal factors, i.e. the heat liberated by the reaction is greater than that lost by self heating, conduction etc. The heat liberated during decomposition is sufficient to melt the surface of the azide and give rise to a reaction that will be self-supporting in the thermal sense. [Pg.183]

The values Qx and Q2 in our formulas may be expressed in terms of the dimensions and temperature of the heated body if the Nusselt number is known as a function of the Grashof number in the case under consideration. If Nu = i/>(Gr) then, within a numerical factor, Qx = A0oi/>(Gr), Q2 = Xd80ip(Gr), where A is the heat conductivity of the medium, 80 is the temperature, and d is the size of the heated body. [Pg.84]

Equations (5.68-5.72) and (5.61) form a set of simultaneous equations for the unknown temperatures, Tc, Ta, T°ut, Tf, 7y ut, and the heat distribution factor a for one cell of the stack. Writing similar equations for all cells in the stack will result in a larger system of simultaneous equations. The equations for neighboring cells are coupled through heat conduction terms. Cell power, voltage, heat generation factor, utilizations of hydrogen and methane and inlet temperatures and concentrations of fuel and air for each cell are the input parameters for the model. [Pg.147]


See other pages where Factor heat conductivity is mentioned: [Pg.247]    [Pg.247]    [Pg.557]    [Pg.625]    [Pg.81]    [Pg.44]    [Pg.38]    [Pg.630]    [Pg.447]    [Pg.313]    [Pg.207]    [Pg.89]    [Pg.302]    [Pg.395]    [Pg.251]    [Pg.79]    [Pg.150]    [Pg.549]    [Pg.28]    [Pg.630]    [Pg.1037]    [Pg.15]    [Pg.89]    [Pg.154]    [Pg.115]    [Pg.217]    [Pg.281]    [Pg.281]    [Pg.277]    [Pg.286]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.51 ]




SEARCH



Conductance factor

Conduction heating

Conductive heating

Heat conductance

Heat conduction

Heat conduction shape factor

Heat conductive

Heat factors

Heat transfer conduction shape factor

© 2024 chempedia.info