Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Exponential decay models

Let us also consider the following exponential decay model, often encountered in analyzing environmental samples,... [Pg.136]

Fig. 4.9. Schematic of time-resolved fluorescence anisotropy sample is excited with linearly polarized light and time-resolved fluorescence images are acquired with polarization analyzed parallel and perpendicular to excitation polarization. Assuming a spherical fluorophore, the temporal decay of the fluorescence anisotropy, r(t), can be fitted to an exponential decay model from which the rotational correlation time, 6, can be calculated. Fig. 4.9. Schematic of time-resolved fluorescence anisotropy sample is excited with linearly polarized light and time-resolved fluorescence images are acquired with polarization analyzed parallel and perpendicular to excitation polarization. Assuming a spherical fluorophore, the temporal decay of the fluorescence anisotropy, r(t), can be fitted to an exponential decay model from which the rotational correlation time, 6, can be calculated.
This correlation corresponds to an exponential decay model, k = koe aY. This expression differs from the conventional exponential model often used in continuous-flow systems 22, 23), k = koe at, in that the analog to time in a pulsed reactor is pulse number or its equivalent, cumulative feed introduced. In our case the correlating quantity is cumulative feed converted, Y. If one assumes that deactivation is caused by coke, the amount of which is proportional to hexane actually converted, this... [Pg.598]

Table IV lists the values of the two parameters, k0 and a, in the exponential decay model for each sample. Too much credence should not be placed in the exact magnitudes of these values since it is known for an exponential model that the covariance of the two parameters is very high (25). It is clear, nevertheless, that the initial activity/ presumably measured by k0, decreases markedly as aluminum is progressively extracted by acid extraction (samples 2 and 3) but increases as sodium is removed by NH4NO3 exchange (samples 4 and 5). Table IV lists the values of the two parameters, k0 and a, in the exponential decay model for each sample. Too much credence should not be placed in the exact magnitudes of these values since it is known for an exponential model that the covariance of the two parameters is very high (25). It is clear, nevertheless, that the initial activity/ presumably measured by k0, decreases markedly as aluminum is progressively extracted by acid extraction (samples 2 and 3) but increases as sodium is removed by NH4NO3 exchange (samples 4 and 5).
Wilkes, Koontz and Cinalli (1996) investigated the emission during 8 to 9 days of low vapor pressure VOCs from water-based paints applied to prepainted gypsumboard. They observed that a double exponential decay model (empirical constants a, b, x, y) fitted the data well ... [Pg.382]

The pathogens (103 to 104 spores mL 1) caused significant shoot growth inhibition within 25 to 30 h and seedling death within 40 to 50 h. Stem collapse time, as a function of various spore concentrations, was also a useful bioassay parameter. Nonlinear regression analysis86 was used to model stem collapse time as a function of spore concentration (Fig. 16.2, solid lines). The trend used for this model was an exponential decay model of the form ... [Pg.344]

Effects of different C. truncatum and A. cassiae spore concentrations on seedling stem collapse bioassay of hemp sesbania and sicklepod, respectively. Solid lines for each data set = predicted trends for C. truncatum/hemp sesbania and for A. cass/ ae/sicklepod interactions, respectively, based on the exponential decay model described in the text. Triangles = recorded values and closed circles = recorded values for A. cass/ ae/sicklepod and C. truncatum/hemp sesbania, respectively. (From Hoagland, R. E. 1995, Biocontrol Sci. Techno ., 5, 251-259. With permission.)... [Pg.346]

Note that if the radiative rate kf can be calculated, then the fluorescence decay rate and fluorescence lifetime follow from the fluorescence quantum yield (jy. Of course, the situation is often more complex. As will be described below, fluorescence decays for proteins often do not follow the single exponential decay model of Equation 2. The fluorescence quantnm yield and Equation 3 then provide an average fluorescence lifetime. [Pg.552]

This differential response is generally not seen in laboratory studies of SOM mineralization (Fang and Moncrieff, 2001 Katterer et al., 1998 Kirschbaum, 1995) or in an analysis of field studies conducted in nonmoisture limiting systems (Lloyd and Taylor, 1994). For example, Katterer et al. (1998) empirically fit two-component exponential decay models (Equation (5)) to 25 sets of incubation data and found that a single nonlinear model could explain 96% of the variance in the SOM decay rate response (r) factor to temperamre (Figure 33). The r-factor is simply a scalar that adjusts aU ki and 2 values to a common temperamre (r = 1 at 30 °C), i.e.. [Pg.4160]

The differential absorption AOD of pi sample between the pump (/l=1.08 pm) and the probe Z=13 pm) beams is presented in Fig. 2. It is defined as AOT>=-lg(7y7 o), where To and T are the transmission of the probe beam without and with pump beam present, respectively. All the samples demonstrate the transient bleaching with a two-component decay. Moreover, time constants of relaxation are QD size dependent. The experimental data are fitted within the framework of the two-exponential decay model ... [Pg.137]

Thus, given the suitability of the exponential decay model the effective and true extinction coefficients (cXcat, Peat) can be estimated for various catalysts. Uie numerical values of the coefficients are reported in the 2 and S columns of Table 4.4. In this respect, there are significant differences in the Peat values for various materials tested, with this coefficient ranging from 8.3 Lg for Rutile 1 sample to 55.3 L g for Degussa P25 catalyst. [Pg.82]

Figure 16.19 shows the results from employing a stretched exponential decay model to fit the data (46). [Pg.568]

The next step in the analysis is to fit the data using a more complex model. The best fit for LADH for two decay times yields an improved match (Fig. 14, right). The calculated and measured values are now in agreement, the deviations are small and random, and xr = 114 is acceptably close to unity. The parameters (a, and t,) which yield this match are taken as the decay law of the sample. The decay times (3.8 and 7.2 nsec) were taken to be due to tryptoph2m 314 and 15, respectively. It must be emphasized that this result does not prove the decay is a double exponential, but only shows that the double exponential model is adequate to explain the data. If data were available with higher time resolution or statistical accuracy (more photons) then it may be necessary to use a more complex three-exponential decay model to explain the data. [Pg.17]

To demonstrate the temporal resolving power of our Instrument Figure 5 shows multifrequency phase and modulation plots for a binary mixture of fluorescein and ubrene. A single exponential fit to the data (not shown) yields ay of 19 and residual errors that deviate in a systematic pattern. However, when the data are fit to a double exponential decay model, the recovered lifetimes of 3 and... [Pg.386]

Predictive models for thermal denaturation of enzymes have been developed [24, 25], the most commonly used one being the exponential decay model ... [Pg.166]

Fig. 5.13. Temporal evolution of the NeNePo signal of silver clusters Agn taken with A = 400 nm. (a) n = 9, (b) n = 5, (c) n = 3. The solid lines were given by a simple exponential decay model which was convoluted with the system response time in (a) and (b), and a smooth interpolation in (c). The fine structure around At = 0 arises from the interference between the pump and the probe pulse (taken from [424])... Fig. 5.13. Temporal evolution of the NeNePo signal of silver clusters Agn taken with A = 400 nm. (a) n = 9, (b) n = 5, (c) n = 3. The solid lines were given by a simple exponential decay model which was convoluted with the system response time in (a) and (b), and a smooth interpolation in (c). The fine structure around At = 0 arises from the interference between the pump and the probe pulse (taken from [424])...
Concerning the decay parameters for each model, no clear trend was established between the catalyst decay constant and temperature. The decay constant, a, for the exponential decay model for the most part increased with increasing temperature, except for the combination of feedstock B with GX-30. Here, ot decreased from 0.034 1/s at 500°C to 0.012 1/s at 525°C then increased to 0.017 1/s at 550°C (Kraemer,1991). However, it can be seen from the confidence intervals on this parameter that the values overlap each other from 500 C to 550°C meaning they are not significantly different. This implies that the decay constant, a, is a weak frinction of temperature... [Pg.110]

In this section, we discuss some explicit forms of the viscoelastic functions that have been found useful in practice. There are two categories (a) exponential decay models and degenerate limits of these, and (b) power law models. The bulk of the section is devoted to the first category, partly because exponential decay models are used often in later chapters. Power law models, however, are of considerable importance in that they are both simple and physically valid to a surprising degree. [Pg.25]

The traditional discussion of mechanical (spring and dashpot) models and the related topic of differential forms of the constitutive equations will not be included here, but are treated extensively in several older references, Gross (1953), Ferry (1970), Bland (1960) for example. See also Nowacki (1965), Flugge (1967) and Lockett (1972). A consistent development of the theory is possible without these concepts. However, they do provide insights into the nature of viscoelastic behaviour and physically motivate exponential decay models. [Pg.25]

This is a decomposition into a polynominal part q(x) and A (a ), which in general has no polynomial part in an exponential decay model, it decays exponentially with X, as we shall see. The polynomial q(x) is known explicitly apart from the fact that it depends on the contact interval [see for example, (3.6.3)] which is not given a priori, but must be determined as a result of solving the problem. [Pg.111]

An exponential decay model was used to represent the decay of activity due to coking, such that ... [Pg.485]


See other pages where Exponential decay models is mentioned: [Pg.165]    [Pg.173]    [Pg.535]    [Pg.433]    [Pg.102]    [Pg.334]    [Pg.66]    [Pg.162]    [Pg.174]    [Pg.284]    [Pg.184]    [Pg.261]    [Pg.185]    [Pg.420]    [Pg.421]    [Pg.142]    [Pg.161]    [Pg.106]    [Pg.111]    [Pg.80]    [Pg.91]    [Pg.104]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.110 ]




SEARCH



Decay Models

Exponential decay

Exponential model

© 2024 chempedia.info