Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Experimental solvation response function

The solvation dynamics response is reported usually in terms of the frequency v(t) at the peak of the fluorescence band [1], The experimental solvation response function is given by... [Pg.367]

Detailed measurements of the s-tetrazine gas-phase spectrum were made. With these data, measurement of the absolute Stokes shift S(t) is possible. Because the Stokes shift is zero in the absence of solvent nuclear dynamics, the magnitude of the Stokes shift at the earliest times represents the amount of relaxation within the experimental time resolution. The steady-state absorption and fluorescence spectra were also measured to provide an independent value of the equilibrium Stokes shift S< With this data, the absolute solvation response function... [Pg.301]

Figure 3 presents a comparison of the non-equilibrium solvent response functions, Eq (1), for both the photoexcitation ("up") and non-adiabatic ("down") transitions (cf. Fig. 2). The two traces are markedly different the inertial component for the downwards transition is faster and accounts for a much larger total percentage of the total solvation response than that following photoexcitation. The solvent molecular motions underlying the upwards dynamics have been explored in detail in previous work, where it was also determined that the solvent response falls within the linear regime. Unfortunately, the relatively small amount of time the electron spends in the excited state prevents the calculation of the equilibrium excited state solvent response function due to poor statistics, leaving the matter of linear response for the downwards S(t) unresolved. Whether the radiationless transition obeys linear response or not, it is clear that the upward and downwards solvation response behave very differently, due in part to the very different equilibrium solvation structures of the ground and excited state species. Interestingly, the downwards S(t), with its much larger inertial component, resembles the aqueous solvation response computed in other simulation studies, and bears a striking similarity to that recently determined in experimental work based on a combination of depolarized Raman and optical Kerr effect data. ... Figure 3 presents a comparison of the non-equilibrium solvent response functions, Eq (1), for both the photoexcitation ("up") and non-adiabatic ("down") transitions (cf. Fig. 2). The two traces are markedly different the inertial component for the downwards transition is faster and accounts for a much larger total percentage of the total solvation response than that following photoexcitation. The solvent molecular motions underlying the upwards dynamics have been explored in detail in previous work, where it was also determined that the solvent response falls within the linear regime. Unfortunately, the relatively small amount of time the electron spends in the excited state prevents the calculation of the equilibrium excited state solvent response function due to poor statistics, leaving the matter of linear response for the downwards S(t) unresolved. Whether the radiationless transition obeys linear response or not, it is clear that the upward and downwards solvation response behave very differently, due in part to the very different equilibrium solvation structures of the ground and excited state species. Interestingly, the downwards S(t), with its much larger inertial component, resembles the aqueous solvation response computed in other simulation studies, and bears a striking similarity to that recently determined in experimental work based on a combination of depolarized Raman and optical Kerr effect data. ...
Fig. 15.4 The experimental solvation function for water using sodium salt of coumarin-343 as a probe. The line marked expt. is the experimental solvation fimction S(t) obtained from the shift in the fluorescence spectrum. The line marked q is a simulation result based on the linear response ftinction C(t). The line Marked 5 is the linear response function for a neutral atomic solute with Lennard Jones parameters of the oxygen atom. (From R. Jimenez, G. R. Fleming, P. V. Kumar, and M. Maroncelli, Nature 369, 471 (1994).)... Fig. 15.4 The experimental solvation function for water using sodium salt of coumarin-343 as a probe. The line marked expt. is the experimental solvation fimction S(t) obtained from the shift in the fluorescence spectrum. The line marked q is a simulation result based on the linear response ftinction C(t). The line Marked 5 is the linear response function for a neutral atomic solute with Lennard Jones parameters of the oxygen atom. (From R. Jimenez, G. R. Fleming, P. V. Kumar, and M. Maroncelli, Nature 369, 471 (1994).)...
Two points should be mentioned here. First, the effect of solutes on the solvent dielectric response can be important in solvents with nonlocal dielectric properties. In principle, this problem can be handled by measuring the spectrum of the whole system, the solvent plus the solutes. Theoretically, the spatial dependence of the dielectric response function, s(r, co), which includes the molecular nature of the solvent, is often treated by using the dynamical mean spherical approximation [28, 36a, 147a, 193-195]. A more advanced approach is based on a molecular hydrodynamic theory [104,191, 196, 197]. These theoretical developments have provided much physical insight into solvation dynamics. However, reasonable agreement between the experimentally measured Stokes shift and emission line shape can be... [Pg.520]

Such numerical simulations have played an important role in the development of our understanding of solvation dynamics. For example, they have provided the first indication that simple dielectric continuum models based on Debye and Debey-like dielectric relaxation theories are inadequate on the fast timescales that are experimentally accessible today. It is important to keep in mind that this failure of simple theories is not a failure of linear response theory. Once revised to describe reliably response on short time and length scales, e.g. by using the full k and (O dependent dielectric response function e(k,o , and sufficiently taking into account the solvent structure about the solute, linear response theory accounts for most observations of solvation dynamics in simple polar solvents. [Pg.145]

A new approach to simulate multidimensional infrared spectroscopy was suggested by Jeon and Cho [840]. They compute the third-order vibrational response function in the classical hmit using MD simulations in combination with QM/MM. In this investigation it could be shown that QM/MM approaches are needed for reliable predictions. Conventional classical force fields are too inaccurate since they cannot describe the intramolecular vibrational anharmonicities which are essential for the production of the nonlinear signal. QM/MM force fields are found to reproduce 2D spectra for V-methylacetamide and carbon monoxide, each solvated in water, in nice agreement with their experimental counterparts. [Pg.60]

Organometallic systems such as porphyrines have been investigated because of the possibility to fine tune their response by functionalization[105-107]. Systems of increased the dimensionality have been of particular interest [108-111], Concomitant to the large effort to establish useful structure-to-properties relationships, considerable effort has now been put to investigate the environmental effects on TPA[112-114], For example, the solvent effect has been studied for a small linear push-pull chromophore using a self-consistent reaction field (homogeneous solvation) method employing a spherical cavity and an internal force field (IFF) method[l 12] in another study the polarizable continuum model has been employed to calculate the relevant quantities to obtain the TPA cross-section in the limit of a two-state model[113] Woo et al. made a critical study of experimental comparison of TPA cross-sections in different solvents[114]. [Pg.291]

Solvation dynamics are measured using the more reliable energy relaxation method after a local perturbation [83-85], typically using a femtosecond-resolved fluorescence technique. Experimentally, the wavelength-resolved transients are obtained using the fluorescence upconversion method [85], The observed fluorescence dynamics, decay at the blue side and rise at the red side (Fig. 3a), reflecting typical solvation processes. The molecular mechanism is schematically shown in Fig. 5. Typically, by following the standard procedures [35], we can construct the femtosecond-resolved emission spectra (FRES, Stokes shifts with time) and then the correlation function (solvent response curve) ... [Pg.89]

Furthermore, the explicit-water simulations do include the CDS terms to the extent that dispersion and hydrogen bonding are well represented by the force field. Finally, by virtue of the solvent being explicitly part of the system, it is possible to derive many useful non-entropy-based properties "" (radial distribution functions, average numbers of hydrogen bonds, size and stability of the first solvation shell, time-dependent correlation functions, etc.). Since many of these properties are experimentally observable, it is often possible to identify and correct at least some deficiencies in the simulation. Simulation is thus an extremely powerful tool for studying solvation, especially when focused on the response of the solvent to the solute. [Pg.7]

A rather simple experimental teehnique involving measurement of the time-dependent fluorescence Stokes shift (TDFSS) after an initial exeitation has been applied to measure SD in a large number of liquids. TDFSS oceurs due to dipolar solvation of the excited probe and thus gives an estimate of the solvation timeseales. In an important paper, Jimenez et al. reported the results of SD of the exeited state of the dye coumarin 343 (C343) in liquid water [14]. Their result is shown in Figure 3.13. The initial part of the solvent response of water was found to be extremely fast (few tens of femtoseconds) and it constituted more than 60% of the total solvation energy relaxation. The subsequent relaxation was found to occur in the picosecond timescale. The decay of the solvation time correlation function, S t)y was fitted to a function of the following form... [Pg.35]


See other pages where Experimental solvation response function is mentioned: [Pg.316]    [Pg.239]    [Pg.388]    [Pg.5]    [Pg.548]    [Pg.239]    [Pg.225]    [Pg.548]    [Pg.415]    [Pg.244]    [Pg.110]    [Pg.580]    [Pg.14]    [Pg.595]    [Pg.489]    [Pg.315]    [Pg.329]    [Pg.334]    [Pg.246]    [Pg.410]    [Pg.421]    [Pg.23]    [Pg.99]    [Pg.34]    [Pg.12]    [Pg.203]    [Pg.199]    [Pg.177]    [Pg.1066]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.368 ]




SEARCH



Response functions

Solvation function

© 2024 chempedia.info