Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Experiment graphing functions

Fig. 13. The effect of the minimum ionic strength, / , on the pH-rate profile for a typical enzymatic reaction. Two types of curves are generated Type I, bell shaped type II, monotonically decreasing, depending on the pH of the experiment. Graphing the pH behavior as a function of ionic strength (a and b show the transformation) and applying the / cut-off (c), it can be seen that, if experimental pH at is lower than the pH optimum, a type I curve is obtained. If the experimental pH is greater, a type II is obtained. Fig. 13. The effect of the minimum ionic strength, / , on the pH-rate profile for a typical enzymatic reaction. Two types of curves are generated Type I, bell shaped type II, monotonically decreasing, depending on the pH of the experiment. Graphing the pH behavior as a function of ionic strength (a and b show the transformation) and applying the / cut-off (c), it can be seen that, if experimental pH at is lower than the pH optimum, a type I curve is obtained. If the experimental pH is greater, a type II is obtained.
These equations hold if an Ignition Curve test consists of measuring conversion (X) as the unique function of temperature (T). This is done by a series of short, steady-state experiments at various temperature levels. Since this is done in a tubular, isothermal reactor at very low concentration of pollutant, the first order kinetic applies. In this case, results should be listed as pairs of corresponding X and T values. (The first order approximation was not needed in the previous ethylene oxide example, because reaction rates were measured directly as the total function of temperature, whereas all other concentrations changed with the temperature.) The example is from Appendix A, in Berty (1997). In the Ignition Curve measurement a graph is made to plot the temperature needed for the conversion achieved. [Pg.105]

C05-0015. A molecular beam experiment of the type illustrated in Figure 5J is performed with an equimolar mixture of He and CO2. Sketch the appearance of a graph of the number of molecules reaching the detector as a function of time. [Pg.301]

Adiabatic calorimetry. Dewar tests are carried out at atmospheric and elevated pressure. Sealed ampoules, Dewars with mixing, isothermal calorimeters, etc. can be used. Temperature and pressure are measured as a function of time. From these data rates of temperature and pressure rises as well as the adiabatic temperature ri.se may be determined. If the log p versus UT graph is a straight line, this is likely to be the vapour pressure. If the graph is curved, decomposition reactions should be considered. Typical temperature-time curves obtained from Dewar flask experiments are shown in Fig. 5.4-60. The adiabatic induction time can be evaluated as a function of the initial temperature and as a function of the temperature at which the induction time, tmi, exceeds a specified value. [Pg.368]

Figure 2.26 represents an example of an ARC plot of the logarithm of the self-heat rate versus the reciprocal temperature. This graph shows the temperature at which a sample or mixture starts to decompose or react measurably, and the rate at which the sample or mixture liberates heat as a function of temperature. In the ARC experiment represented in Figure 2.26, exothermic decomposition or reaction is first observed at 80°C with a self-heat rate of 0.025°C/min. The maximum temperature reached is 142°C with a maximum self-heat rate of 6°C/min. The data must be corrected for the thermal inertia () of the system. [Pg.74]

Array programming is used here which allows the graphing of the axial profile. Closed-end boundary conditions are used for the first and last segments. Also included is a PULSE function for simulating tracer experiments. Thus it should be possible to calculate the E curve and from that the reaction conversion obtained on the basis of tracer experiment. The example CSTRPULSE should be consulted for this. [Pg.337]

Based on data of the type displayed in Fig. 40, Davis and his coworkers determined the Sherwood numbers for a number of droplet experiments, and their results are displayed in Fig. 41, a graph of the Sherwood number as a function of the Peclet number. [Pg.73]

A set of experiments was performed at variable droplet sizes. The graph in Fig. 4.7 shows the dependence of the normalized (by Kint/a) osmotic resistance as a function of the oil volume fraction. The normalized values fall onto a single curve within reasonable experimental uncertainty. The results were compared to the normalized data obtained by Mason et al. [7] in the presence of surfactants. These latter are represented as a solid line that corresponds to the best fit to the experimental points (Eq. (4.18)). It is worth noting that the normalized pressures in solid-stabilized emulsions are much larger than the ones obtained in the presence of surfactants. [Pg.137]

The study of chemical reactions requires the definition of simple concepts associated with the properties ofthe system. Topological approaches of bonding, based on the analysis of the gradient field of well-defined local functions, evaluated from any quantum mechanical method are close to chemists intuition and experience and provide method-independent techniques [4-7]. In this work, we have used the concepts developed in the Bonding Evolution Theory [8] (BET, see Appendix B), applied to the Electron Localization Function (ELF, see Appendix A) [9]. This method has been applied successfully to proton transfer mechanism [10,11] as well as isomerization reaction [12]. The latter approach focuses on the evolution of chemical properties by assuming an isomorphism between chemical structures and the molecular graph defined in Appendix C. [Pg.345]

The IMEP rounds involve laboratories are from all around the world of different metrological function and experience. Measuring the same quantity in the same sample yields evidence of measurement capability. Complete anonymity of laboratories is preserved, and although the program provides analysis of the results in the form of tables and graphs, laboratories draw their own conclusions about the accuracy of their results. [Pg.154]

Data obtained from a typical experiment are plotted as the intensity of the electron emission as a function of the binding energy of the ejected electrons, as shown in Fig. 6.20. This graph or spectrum contains several maxima (peaks) positioned at the binding energies of the emitted electrons. Since these energies are characteristic of the atoms from which they were emitted, it is possible to identify the elements of the surface region of the material examined. [Pg.79]

Exercise 4.41 Thought experiment draw the graph ofy = sinx/or x in the interval [—tt, tt]. Now wrap the paper on which the graph is drawn around a cylinder so that the x — axis forms a circle, with the point (rr, 0) meeting the point —tt, 0). What shape does the graph of sin form (Hint consider the restrictions to the unit circle of the functions f and f introduced in Section 4.4.)... [Pg.151]

The surface nitrogen concentration [N(s)] was measured as a function of time for ammonia pressures of 124 and 1400 Pa. Calculate [N(s>] (atoms/cm2) as a function of time for these two pressures, and compare with experimental values from Ref. [425] (data can be found in the file SiNitridation, csv). Plot theory and experiment on the same graph. Take k2 = 1.5 x 10 4 s 1. [Pg.485]

A kinetic experiment is carried out in a flow tube where the flow rate is 25 m s. The detector is a spectrophotometer, and absorbances are measured at various distances along the tube. The reactant has a molar absorption coefficient, e = 1180 mol-1 dm3 cm-1. The absorbances are measured using a 1 cm optical cell. Use this information, and that in the following table, to calculate [reactant] as a function of time. Then plot a graph of [reactant] versus time and comment on its shape. [Pg.41]

In carrying out the experiment, a graph of temperature as a function of time was plotted. Why was this done ... [Pg.117]


See other pages where Experiment graphing functions is mentioned: [Pg.121]    [Pg.386]    [Pg.271]    [Pg.165]    [Pg.737]    [Pg.744]    [Pg.6]    [Pg.176]    [Pg.375]    [Pg.234]    [Pg.139]    [Pg.271]    [Pg.216]    [Pg.483]    [Pg.195]    [Pg.239]    [Pg.251]    [Pg.521]    [Pg.64]    [Pg.230]    [Pg.24]    [Pg.129]    [Pg.140]    [Pg.235]    [Pg.14]    [Pg.390]    [Pg.30]    [Pg.299]    [Pg.103]    [Pg.159]    [Pg.408]    [Pg.574]    [Pg.94]    [Pg.311]    [Pg.172]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.6 ]




SEARCH



Graph function

Graphing functions

© 2024 chempedia.info