Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Evaluation of the Activity Coefficient

We proceed now to demonstrate how the activity coefficient for the component / of the mixture is evaluated from these data. [Pg.441]

The vapor pressure of pure liquid i, Pf, can be calculated from some appropriate relationship, such as the Antoine equation. (In practice, however, it is recommended that for improved accuracy of the calculated activity coefficients it is better to measure Pf directly, by running an experimental VLE measurement with pure i, see Example 13.1.) [Pg.442]

Determination, thus, of the activity coefficient value requires the evaluation of the two fugacity coefficients and of the Poynting effect. To this purpose, we recall from Chapters 9 and 11 that at the low pressures of interest here  [Pg.442]

Fugacity coefficients of pure saturated liquids, and of the components of a vapor phase, can be successfiilly evaluated through the virial equation truncated after B  [Pg.442]

In the absence of experimental values for the second virial coefficients, predicted ones through the Tsonopoulos (1974 1975) or the Hayden-O Connell (1975) correlations, provide reliable estimates of the fugacity coefficients. [Pg.442]


Evaluation of the activity coefficients, (or y for noncondensable components),is implemented by the FORTRAN subroutine GAMMA, which finds simultaneously the coefficients for all components. This subroutine references subroutine TAUS to obtain the binary parameters, at system temperature. [Pg.76]

The problem at hand is the evaluation of the activity coefficient defined in Eq. (76). It will be assumed that only pairwise interactions between the defects need be considered at the low defect concentrations we have in mind. (The theory can be extended to include non-pairwise forces.23) Then the cluster function R(n) previously defined in Eq. (78) is the sum of all multiply connected diagrams, in which each bond represents an /-function, which can be drawn among the set of n vertices, the /-function being defined by Eqs. (66), (56), and (43). The Helmholtz free energy of interaction of two defects appearing in this definition can be written as... [Pg.46]

Let us first consider the evaluation of the activity coefficient apart from the final set of terms corresponding to diagrams with three or more vertices (Eq. (146)). [Pg.59]

The second semiempirical approach to the evaluation of the activity coefficient is the use of the Davies equation which modifies the Bronsted extension of the limiting Debye-Hilckel expression and is given by... [Pg.108]

From a Solution Model. Calculation of the difference in reduced standard-state chemical potentials by methods I or III in the absence of experimental thermodynamic properties for the liquid phase necessitates the imposition of a solution model to represent the activity coefficients of the stoichiometric liquid. Method I is equivalent to the equation of Vieland (106) and has been used almost exclusively in the literature. The principal difference between methods I and III is in the evaluation of the activity coefficients... [Pg.153]

One of the concerns regarding the use of COSMO-RS thermodynamics directly in simulations is the considerably larger computation time that is required for the evaluation of the activity coefficients compared to simpler empiricEd models with... [Pg.130]

Potentiometry has found extensive application over the past half-century as a means to evaluate various thermodynamic parameters. Although this is not the major application of the technique today, it still provides one of the most convenient and reliable approaches to the evaluation of thermodynamic quantities. In particular, the activity coefficients of electroactive species can be evaluated directly through the use of the Nemst equation (for species that give a reversible electrochemical response). Thus, if an electrochemical system is used without a junction potential and with a reference electrode that has a well-established potential, then potentiometric measurement of the constituent species at a known concentration provides a direct measure of its activity. This provides a direct means for evaluation of the activity coefficient (assuming that the standard potential is known accurately for the constituent half-reaction). If the standard half-reaction potential is not available, it must be evaluated under conditions where the activity coefficient can be determined by the Debye-Hiickel equation. [Pg.41]

The data necessary for the evaluation of the activity coefficients (or fugacities) of the individual gases in a mixture ( 30e) are not usually available, and an alternative treatment for allowing for departure from ideal behavior is frequently adopted. [Pg.275]

The difficulty in the evaluation of the activity coefficients and therefore activities in the resin phase is great. For most practical applications it is usnally satisfactory to assume thet the solulion-phese activity coefficients are almost unity, which is particularly valid in dilute solutions. Therefore, the reain-phase activity coefficients usually are combined into the equilibrium constant Ka. to provide a new pesndoconsiant. that is, the selectivity coefficient Jfr. Thus,... [Pg.699]

It is clear from Eq. (13-105) that a knowledge of e and ci- permits evaluation of the activity coefficient v . Comparison of results obtained by this method with those from other techniques yields excellent agreement. Thus, the applicability of thermodynamic theory to the case of partial equilibrium in a galvanic cell with liquid junction is demonstrated. [Pg.217]

Step 1 Evaluation of the activity coefficient y, of each component in each phase at a different temperature, pressure and composition, measured experimentally or determined from an appropriate correlation. [Pg.17]

Section 9.6.1 described the evaluation of the activity coefficient of a constituent of a liquid mixture from its fugacity in a gas phase equilibrated with the mixture. Section 9.6.3 mentioned the use of solvent fugacities in gas phases equilibrated with pure solvent and with a solution, in order to evaluate the osmotic coefficient of the solution. [Pg.267]

Values chosen for the evaluation of the activity coefficient quotients are given in Table 4. [Pg.16]

In some cases, the temperature of the system may be larger than the critical temperature of one (or more) of the components, i.e., system temperature T may exceed T. . In that event, component i is a supercritical component, one that cannot exist as a pure liquid at temperature T. For this component, it is still possible to use symmetric normalization of the activity coefficient (y - 1 as x - 1) provided that some method of extrapolation is used to evaluate the standard-state fugacity which, in this case, is the fugacity of pure liquid i at system temperature T. For highly supercritical components (T Tj,.), such extrapolation is extremely arbitrary as a result, we have no assurance that when experimental data are reduced, the activity coefficient tends to obey the necessary boundary condition 1... [Pg.58]

The temperature dependence of the activity coefficients is assumed to have a particularly simple form, and this can sometimes lead to serious error at temperatures far away from those used to evaluate the solubility parameters. [Pg.175]

The activity coefficients are evaluated from the above phase equilibrium data by procedures widely available in the thermodynamics literature (Tassios, 1993 Prausnitz et al. 1986). Since the objective in this book is parameter estimation we will provide evaluated values of the activity coefficients based on... [Pg.279]

Gutbezahl, B. Grunwald, E., The acidity and basicity scale in the system ethanol-water. The evaluation of degenrate activity coefficients for single ions, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 75, 565-574 (1953). [Pg.260]

We can now evaluate how a given organic cosolvent will affect the various parameters in Eq. 9-32. In Section 5.4 we discussed the dependence of the activity coefficient of a compound in a solvent-water mixture on the fraction of the cosolvent. We have seen that, depending on solute and cosolvent considered, this dependence may be quite complex (Figs. 5.6 and 5.7 Table 5.8). In the following discussion, we confine ourselves to rather small cosolvent concentrations (i.e.,/v < 0.2 to 0.3) for which we may assume a log-linear relationship (Eq. 5-32). We may then express the activity coefficient, Yu, of compound i in the solvent-water mixture as ... [Pg.311]

Technically, COSMO-RS meets all requirements for a thermodynamic model in a process simulation. It is able to evaluate the activity coefficients of the components at a given mixture composition vector, x, and temperature, T. As shown in Appendix C of [Cl 7], even the analytic derivatives of the activity coefficients with respect to temperature and composition, which Eire required in many process simulation programs for most efficient process optimization, can be evaluated within the COSMO-RS framework. Within the COSMOt/ierra program these analytic derivatives Eire available at negligible additionEd expense. COSMOt/ierra can Eilso be csdled as a subroutine, Euid hence a simulator program can request the activity coefficients and derivatives whenever it needs such input. [Pg.130]

Ethyl bromide, in a static system, was studied at 724.5-755.1 K103. The pressure dependence for the HBr elimination was observed in its fall-off region. Evaluation of the rate coefficients was performed by using the RRKM theory and the values were compared with the experimental observation. The work reported an activation energy of 216.3 kJ moT1 and an Arrhenius A factor of 1012 5. The low-frequency factor was rationalized in terms of the formation of a tight activated complex and a molecular elimination as a prevalent reaction mode. [Pg.1085]

Temperature dependence and activation energy. The importance of the evaluation of the temperature coefficient of the reaction rate has been previously discussed (27). Since the oxidation rate follows a parabolic equation, it is possible to evaluate the rate constants and, using these constants, the energy and entropy of activation of the rate-controlling processes. [Pg.159]

Formalism According to Pitzer. The most common method for the evaluation of the activity and osmotic coefficients of an electrolyte in a binary mixture of strong electrolytes with a common ion is by Scatchard s Equations (23), the McKay-Perring treatment (24), Mayers Equations... [Pg.271]

Values of Activity Coefficients.—Without entering into details, it is evident from the foregoing discussion that activities and activity coefficients are related to chemical potentials or free energies several methods, both direct and indirect, are available for determining the requisite differences of free energy so that activities, relative to the specified standard states, can be evaluated. In the study of the activity coefficients of electrolytes the procedures generally employed are based on measurements of either vapor pressure, freezing point, solubility or electromotive force. The results obtained by the various methods arc... [Pg.138]

By using activity coefficients obtained from b.m.f. measurements, integration of the Gibbs-Duhem equation permits the evaluation of the activity of the solvent (water) cf., Newton and Tippetts, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 58, 280 (1936). [Pg.392]

This expression provides a method for evaluating the mean ionic activity coefficient 7 in a hydrochloric acid solution of molality m from a measurement of the E.M.F., i.e., E, of the cell described above it is necessary, however, to know the value of , the standard e.m.f. For this purpose the data must be extrapolated to infinite dilution, and the reliability of the activity coefficients obtained from equation (39.58) depends upon the accuracy of this extrapolation. Two main procedures have been used for this purpose, but both are limited, to some extent, by the accuracy of b.h.f. measurements made with cells containing very dilute solutions. ... [Pg.393]

Equations D.l.9 provide the unconstrained (by Xj + X2 = 1) partial derivatives of the activity coefficients. It is essential to evaluate the second partial derivatives of Q before making any use of Xj + = 1 to simplify the results of the first differentiation. Only after... [Pg.541]

When using the UNIFAC model one needs to identify the functional subgroups present in each molecule by means of the UNIFAC group table. Next, similar to the UNIQUAC model, the activity coefficient for each species is written as eqn. (2.4.14), except for the the residual term, which is evaluated by a group contribution method in UNIFAC, The residual contribution of the logarithm of the activity coefficient of group k in the mixture. In F., is obtained from... [Pg.16]

The equilibrium constant K°(V.23) is small. The problem is the evaluation of the concentration quotient from a measurement of the hydrogen ion activity rather than the extrapolation of this quotient to / = 0. The value obtained for K° (V.23) is thus sensitive to the expression chosen for the calculation of the activity coefficients. The data in [64NAI], measured by the cell ... [Pg.147]


See other pages where Evaluation of the Activity Coefficient is mentioned: [Pg.376]    [Pg.441]    [Pg.443]    [Pg.376]    [Pg.441]    [Pg.443]    [Pg.537]    [Pg.277]    [Pg.237]    [Pg.195]    [Pg.363]    [Pg.268]    [Pg.317]    [Pg.885]    [Pg.517]    [Pg.293]    [Pg.12]    [Pg.674]    [Pg.358]    [Pg.407]    [Pg.446]    [Pg.37]    [Pg.43]   


SEARCH



Coefficient of the

Evaluation of Activity Coefficients

© 2024 chempedia.info