Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Ethylene polarization curves

Figure 1 Cathodic polarization curves for solutions with varying ethylene diamine concentrations. Figure 1 Cathodic polarization curves for solutions with varying ethylene diamine concentrations.
Plating tests conducted at other ethylene diamine concentrations are shown in Figure 3. When no ethylene diamine is present in the solution, the 50at.%Sn plateau is reached at 2.4 mA/cm2, while at a concentration of 0.05M-0.06M ethylene diamine, the plateau begins at 1.4 mA/cm2. This is consistent with the shift of the plateau of the polarization curve to lower current densities at higher ethylene diamine concentrations in Figure 1. [Pg.331]

When the ethylene diamine concentration of the solution is 0.11M, the highest tested in this study, the Sn content in the deposits never exceeds 20at.%. and burned deposits are observed at current densities greater than 1.8 mA/cm2. This is again consistent with the polarization curve for this solution, although the correlation between the Sn content in the deposit and the polarization curve is not clear. [Pg.332]

The ORR was also analyzed on perovskite-type oxide Laj xStx Mn03 in direct ethylene glycol alkaline fuel cells (DEGAFQ observing a high tolerance to EG since the cathodic polarization curves were not affected by the concentration of EG supplied to the anodic side [57]. [Pg.74]

EIS measurements further show that the addition of KF into ethylene glycol leads to a strikingly enhanced Rp but decreased Q. The reduced Q and improved Rp can be associated with the formation of a three-dimensional film on the magnesium surface. Polarization curve measurements also confirm that the phase film formed on the magnesium surface is responsible for the reduced corrosion rate of magnesium. After addition of KF, the anodic polarization current is significantly reduced to a very low value and a low current-plateau is seen where the anodic current is almost independent of the polarization potential. [Pg.447]

Historically, ethylene potymerization was carried out at high pressure (1000-3000 atm) and high temperature (100-250 °C) in the presence of a catalyst such as benzoyl peroxide, although other catalysts and reaction conditions are now more often used. The key step is the addition of a radical to the ethylene double bond, a reaction similar in many respects to what takes place in the addition of an electrophile. In writing the mechanism, recall that a curved half-arrow, or "fishhook" A, is used to show the movement of a single electron, as opposed to the full curved arrow used to show the movement of an electron pair in a polar reaction. [Pg.240]

If the size of the solvent molecule is kept constant, but some polarity is added to it, the cloud-point curve shifts to much lower temperatures as shown with ethane and ethylene. Notice that the pressure of the ethylene cloud-point curve is not radically lower than that of the ethane curve since the densities of both solvents are very close to one another at these elevated pressures. [Pg.12]

Finally, in this section, the simple Hartmann-Hahn cross polarization experiment, and in particular, the JH-19F CP build up curve was used to determine the residual JH-19F dipolar coupling constant due to motion in an ethylene/tetrafluoroethylene co-polymer.31 This curve for the crystalline... [Pg.68]

Figure 3.28 shows the P-T diagram for four polyethylene-low molecular weight hydrocarbon mixtures. The cloud point pressures decrease substantially with increasing carbon number, or conversely polarizability, as a result of increased dispersion interactions between polyethylene and the solvent. Free volume differences between polyethylene and the hydrocarbons also decrease as the carbon number is increased. Even though ethane and ethylene have virtually identical polarizabilities, the cloud point curve with ethane is at a much lower pressure than that with ethylene, since the quadrupole moment of ethylene enhances ethylene-ethylene interactions relative to ethylene-polyethylene interactions because polyethylene is a nonpolar polymer. The two cloud point curves for polyethylene with propane and propylene are virtually identical. Evidently, the quadrupole moment for propylene is weak enough that propylene-propylene polar interactions do not substantially influence the strong dispersion interactions between polyethylene and each of these two solvents of virtually identical polarizabilities. [Pg.70]

It may be tentatively assumed that curve 1 in Fig. 3 does not contradict the very scarce experimental data on the anionic polymerization of symmetric vinyl monomers. For instance, it is known (bibliography see Ref. [593) that ethylene is anionically polymerized on the polarized carbon-lithium bond or the corresponding contact ion pair. However, additional experimental investigations are needed for drawing a more definite conclusion about the validity of curve 1 in Fig. 3. [Pg.163]

Only a few claims of the discovery of nonspherical structures in microemulsions by TRLQ have been published as yet. The quenching of Rulbpy) " by MV- in water-in-oil microemulsions of the nonionic amphiphile C12E4 in decane indicates the presence of nonglobular structures at high water/surfactant ratios. This comes mainly from the fact that if spherical structures are assumed, the aggregation numbers estimated by TRLQ would imply unreasonably small areas per surfactant at the interface, and simultaneously the radius of the aqueous droplet that would far exceed the length of the polar chain (four ethylene oxides) of the surfactant. A pool of pure water would thus be present in the middle of the droplet, and the EO tails would be compressed close to the interface. It appears more likely that the micelles take on a nonspherical shape, and this would furthermore be compatible with the observed decay curves [47]. [Pg.616]

Another possibility to increase the polarity of a polymer is the incorporation of polar units into the polymer backbone via the synthesis of copolymers. Fig. 2.5 shows the CO2 solubility of poly(ethylene-co-methyl acrylate)s with varying amounts of the methyl acrylate monomers in the copolymer molecules. As the methyl acrylate content increases, the favorable dipole-quadrupole interactions between the methyl acrylate units and the CO2 lead to enhanced solubility and shift the cloud point curves to lower temperatures and pressures. [Pg.20]

For comparative purposes. Fig. 25 reports also the polarization and power density curves exhibited by a DEFC containing a Pd/C anode catalyst obtained by reduction with ethylene glycol of Vulcan XC-72-adsoibed PdCl2. " Although providing good results, there is little doubt that the Pd/C catalyst is much less efficient, especially in terms of potential output and electrochemical stabihty, than the Pd-(Ni-Zn)/C and Pd-(Ni-Zn-P)/C catalysts, obtained by the spontaneous deposition procedure. [Pg.235]

The ratio between ethylene and propylene units in Elastokam 7505 is similar to that in EPDM-60 (II), but the degree of isotacticity of propylene units is lower (9.5%) and the Mooney viscosity is very high (Table 2.3). Elastokam 7505 is characterized by the minimum compatibility with all BNR samples. As follows from Fig. 2.2 (curve 4), the friability of the interfacial layer of this EPDM is maximum as a result, (-a ) markedly increases with a decrease in the polarity of SKN (by a factor of 3). The worst results were observed for EPDM-60 (II) with an increased content of diene units and for Elastokam 7505 with a high Mooney viscosity. [Pg.22]

Endotherm (3) indicates the melting at 526 K, and finally, there is a broad, exotherm with two peaks (4) due to decomposition. Again, this DTA curve is quite characteristic of poly(ethylene terephthalate) and can be used for its identification. Optical observation to recognize glass and melt by their clear appearances is helpful. Microscopy between crossed polars is even more definitive for the identification of an isotropic liquid or glass (see Sect. 3.4.4). [Pg.167]


See other pages where Ethylene polarization curves is mentioned: [Pg.107]    [Pg.110]    [Pg.431]    [Pg.439]    [Pg.527]    [Pg.356]    [Pg.47]    [Pg.320]    [Pg.55]    [Pg.82]    [Pg.277]    [Pg.79]    [Pg.257]    [Pg.277]    [Pg.553]    [Pg.111]    [Pg.9]    [Pg.68]    [Pg.69]    [Pg.80]    [Pg.123]    [Pg.208]    [Pg.331]    [Pg.341]    [Pg.257]    [Pg.318]    [Pg.8405]    [Pg.500]    [Pg.787]    [Pg.401]    [Pg.184]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.34 ]




SEARCH



Polarization curves

Polarized curve

© 2024 chempedia.info