Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Normal error

The basic premise of the SLIM technique is that the probability of error associated with a task, subtask, task step, or individual error is a function of the PIFs in the situation. As indicated in Chapter 3, an extremely large number of PIFs could potentially impact on the likelihood of error. Normally the PIFs that are considered in SLIM analyses are the direct influences on error such as levels of training, quality of procedures, distraction level, degree of feedback from the task, level of motivation, etc. However, in principle, there is no reason why higher level influences such as management policies should not also be incorporated in SLIM analyses. [Pg.234]

PERMUTATIONS AND COMBINATIONS PROBABILITY DENSITY FUNCTION PROBABLE ERROR NORMAL ERROR CURVE STATISTICS (A Primer)... [Pg.773]

Equation (27) expresses an error in the dynamic matrix element Lij obtained from full matrix analysis if the error in peak volumes is Aa [50]. It also assumes that volume errors are equal for all peaks and are uncorrelated Aa is volume error normalized to the volume of a single spin at Tm = 0. Modem computer programs (Matlab, Mathematica, Mapple) can calculate the dynamic matrix from eq. (11) directly. [Pg.279]

For acenaphthylene using PLS1, the cross-validated error is presented in Fig. 18. An immediate difference between autoprediction and cross-validation is evident. In the former case the data will always be better modelled as more components are employed in the calculation, so the error will always reduce (with occasional rare exceptions in the case of 1 Hcai). Flowever, cross-validated errors normally reach a minimum as the correct number of components are found and then increase afterwards. This is because later components really represent noise and not systematic information in the data. [Pg.21]

Box and Draper (1965) derived a density function for estimating the parameter vector 6 of a multiresponse model from a full data matrix Y, subject to errors normally distributed in the manner of Eq. (4.4-3) with a full unknown covariance matrix E. With this type of data, every event u has a full set of m responses, as illustrated in Table 7.1. The predictive density function for prospective data arrays Y from n independent events, consistent with Eqs. (7.1-1) and (7.1-3), is... [Pg.143]

The greatest sensitivity is observed for plots of residual errors. Residual errors normalized by the value of the impedance are presented in Figures 20.5(a) and (b), respectively, for the real and imaginary parts of the impedance. The experimentally measured standard deviation of the stochastic part of the measurement is presented as dashed lines in Figure 20.5. The interval between the dashed lines represents the 95.4 percent confidence interval for the data ( 2cr). Significant trending is observed as a function of frequency for residual errors of both real and imaginary parts of the impedance. [Pg.391]

There are many possible sources of errors in a protein structure determination. None of the intensities measured are totally precise, but contain the experimental errors normally encountered for the methods used. In addition, the heavy-atom positions and relative phase angles derived from them may contain errors due to disturbances to atomic positions caused by introduction of the heavy atom. [Pg.50]

Requirements-based tests are usually classified as either normal (i.e., tests if the requirements are satisfied) or robustness (i.e., tests if the requirements are robust, meaning not prone to violation by abnormal conditions such as fault and failure conditions caused hy errors). Normal and robustness tests, including compatibihty with hardware, consist of the following ... [Pg.312]

The first two terms in equations (12.7) and (12.8) estimate the flow time, and the last term is a waiting time allowance based on the forecast error. Normal probability tables can be used to choose the 7 value to satisfy the service level constraint on the maximum number of tardy jobs. [Pg.528]

The caveat here is that discriminant analysis, like most statistical methods, relies on certain assumptions about your data (random errors, normal distribu-... [Pg.69]

Comparing computed and measured isotope distributions is a vector compeuison between x = (xq,. xjt j) emd y = (yo, , yjt-i)- Methods for comparing two vectors include the scalar product (or dot product), the sum of absolute errors and the sum of squared errors. Normalizing these to give a match value between 0 and 1 yields three methods for calculating MS match values ... [Pg.375]

Figure 2.15 If a press-fitted component is subject to angular misalignment (a) then the maximum error normally seen in a slip-fitted assembly is readily exceeded (top right) (b). Where a second bearing is involved, shaft distortion can occur (c). (See also Figure 2.20.)... Figure 2.15 If a press-fitted component is subject to angular misalignment (a) then the maximum error normally seen in a slip-fitted assembly is readily exceeded (top right) (b). Where a second bearing is involved, shaft distortion can occur (c). (See also Figure 2.20.)...
Normal Law Normal Law of Error Normal or Gaussian Distribution Law Gauss Error Curve Probability Curve... [Pg.561]

In view of the experimental errors normally affecting shear cell measurements and the amount of personal judgement required to draw Mohr stress circles tangential to a curved yield locus, there is always some uncertainty in the flow function derived from the Jenike-type shear yield loci method. A direct measurement therefore offers considerable advantage and, besides possibly giving better accuracy, may prove to be more rapid and reproducible. [Pg.41]

Importance sampling, difference schemes, and their combinations all have the desirable characteristic of giving small errors for good trial wavefunctions and no errors in the limit of exact trial wavefunctions. Difference calculations have the additional desirable characteristic of correcting good trial wavefunctions to yield better ones. Rather than calculate a complete wavefunction, one may calculate the much smaller correction to a trial wavefunction. The statistical error normally associated with Monte Carlo calculations may then be limited to the correction term and thus reduced in size. [Pg.162]

The long-term error of pH measurements Installed in the process is an order of magnitude greater than the error normally stated In the literature. [Pg.82]

UQstrained rubber. Equations 2 and 6 are equivalent. However, the latter is not as sensitive to the experimental errors normally encountered in thermoelastic measurements. Equation 2 depends on X to the inverse third power, which magnifies any error in the extension ratios. [Pg.49]


See other pages where Normal error is mentioned: [Pg.28]    [Pg.385]    [Pg.7]    [Pg.316]    [Pg.446]    [Pg.257]    [Pg.87]    [Pg.187]    [Pg.67]    [Pg.441]    [Pg.91]    [Pg.265]    [Pg.500]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.24 , Pg.28 ]




SEARCH



Error normal form correction

Error, normally distributed

MULTIRESPONSE NORMAL ERROR DISTRIBUTIONS

Normal error curve equation

Normal error curve experiment

Normal error curve)

Normal error curve) properties

Normal error probability function

Normalized standard error

The Normal Law of Error

© 2024 chempedia.info