Equipotential section

Figure 2. Equipotential sections through the potential energy surface for an exchange reaction. The sections define ellipses if the surfaces are parabolic the top left set refer to the initial state (precursor complex) and the bottom right set refer to the final state (successor complex). The dashed line indicates the reaction coordinate. Parameters P and Pa reflect the state of polarization of the solvent, and coordinates d2 and da reflect the inner-shell configurations of the two reactants...

Figure 3. Equipotential sections through the potential energy surface for an exchange reaction, as in Figure 2. The heavy horizontal line indicates the solvent configuration appropriate to the activated complex and is the solvent configuration at which inner-sphere tunneling takes place.

For instance, the following equation shows the voltage, U, between two sections separated by a distance in a homogeneous unidirectional conductor and with an equipotential section of area S ... 

We generalize the two-dimensional "floor path problem" of a valley which we have analyzed in Sect. 3.1, to the n-dimensional case, ns(3N-3). In general, if n>2 we cannot visualize the PES in such a dimension. We will discuss representations of equipotential sections. In the 2D case, a section E(x,y)=const of E with a "shifted" 2D configuration plane gives ID figures of the section, curves of the type in Fig.l of Sect. 3.1 (E(x,y)=0 is the section with the x,y-... 

E(x,y,z)=l, which is an ordinary 2D spherical surface x +y +z =1 in the 3D space of the coordinates (x,y,z). It can be considered either as being shifted at the height one of the dimension axis of , or, as being projected as an equipotential hypersurface down into the configuration space. In the general n-dimensional configuration space, the PES is a curvilinear n-dimensional hypersurface in the (n+1) dimensions of the space of coordinates plus E, and equipotential sections of E are (n-1)-dimensional hypersurfaces. 

A still different approach to multilayer adsorption considers that there is a potential field at the surface of a solid into which adsorbate molecules fall. The adsorbed layer thus resembles the atmosphere of a planet—it is most compressed at the surface of the solid and decreases in density outward. The general idea is quite old, but was first formalized by Polanyi in about 1914—see Brunauer [34]. As illustrated in Fig. XVII-12, one can draw surfaces of equipo-tential that appear as lines in a cross-sectional view of the surface region. The space between each set of equipotential surfaces corresponds to a definite volume, and there will thus be a relationship between potential U and volume 0. 

Installation of grounds, standing surface insulation, or equipotential grounding mats are necessary in the case of pipeline potentials higher than 65 V [2]. In the case of long sections of parallelism for an overhead power line and a pipeline, continuous grounding with respect to the distances and the resistances of the grounds... 

If the spherical anode is situated at a finite depth, f, the resistance is higher than for t and lower than for t = 0 (hemisphere at the surface of the electrolyte). Its value is obtained by the mirror image of the anode at the surface (f = 0), so that the sectional view gives an equipotential line distribution similar to that shown in Fig. 24-4 for the current distribution around a pipeline. This remains unchanged if the upper half is removed (i.e., only the half space is considered). 

The CHA is shown in schematic cross-section in Fig. 2.5 [2.5]. Two hemispheres of radii ri (inner) and T2 (outer) are positioned concentrically. Potentials -Vi and -V2 are applied to the inner and outer hemispheres, respectively, with V2 greater than Vi. The source S and the focus E are in the same plane as the center of curvature, and Tq is the radius of the equipotential surface between the hemispheres. If electrons of energy E = eVo are injected at S along the equipotential surface, they will be focused at Eif ... 

Figure 3. Vertical cross-section showing equipotential contours inside a conductive cylindrical silo containing a symmetric conical heap of uniformly charged solids. The electrostatic potential maximum exists on the center line somewhat below the powder surface, while the maximum electric field intensity occurs near the wall just above the powder.

The values of Cy, of course, depend on which equipotential surface is used to represent the ion. Since these surfaces can be arbitrarily chosen, it might be supposed that all the values of Cy can also be arbitrarily chosen. However, the number of ions is always less than the number of bonds. If there are ions in the array, it is only possible to assign arbitrary values of Cy to - 1 bonds, those in the spanning tree described in Section 2.5 below. For the remaining bonds, those that close the loops in the network, a knowledge of the bond topology alone is insufficient to determine Cy. To find these values of Cy, the geometry of the array, i.e. the positions of the ions, must also be known. 

Fig. 2. Unit sphere in the electronic space jc, y, z of the matrix Hamiltonian (29). Solid lines are equipotential cross-sections of the isostationary function and bold dots are trigonal minimum points. The wells are labeled 1,2, 3, and 4. The corresponding antipodal doubles are labeled V, 2f, 3, and 4. The broken line connecting 1 with 3 is the line of steepest descend.

Fig. 4. Equipotential cross-sections of the lowest sheet of the APES described by equation (35). The solid line connecting the wells is the line of steepest descend approximately expressed by equation (36).

As the specific resistance of the solution increases, the geometry becomes more important, as has been shown in the previous sections. The uncompensated resistance will remain large unless the tip of the reference electrode is located very close to the working-electrode surface. This tip must be quite small otherwise the current density will be nonuniform over the electrode surface because of distortion of the equipotential lines by the top of the reference electrode. 

Due to its simple construction and the lack of galvanic isolation, a safety barrier shall be connected to the equipotential bonding system, which is stipulated imperatively in hazardous areas. As a rule, a minimum conductor cross-section of 4 mm2 (for copper) or an earthing resistance lower than 1 ohm shall be used. 

In corrosion systems, a salt film may cover an electrode that is itself covered by a porous oxide layer. If two different layers are superimposed, the geometrical analysis shows that the equivalent circuit corresponds to that described in Section 9.3.1 with an additional series Rti a. circuit to take into account the effect of the second porous layer. The circuit shown in Figure 9.5 is approximate because it assumes that the botmdary between the inner and outer layers can be considered to be an equipotential plane. This plane will, however, be influenced by the presence of pores. The circuit shown in Figure 9.5 will provide a good representation for systems with an outer layer that is much thicker than the inner layer and with an inner layer that has relatively few pores. 

Let again R be the center-of-mass separation vector at a point of the trajectory, v the relative velocity and n the unit vector perpendicular to the equipotential contour at the point in question (Figure 5). In the case of a diatomic reagent the formulas given in Section 2 assume the following simpler form ... 

Figure 8.7 Cross-section showing graphical relation between equipotential surfaces, u = constant, and those of v = constant and z = constant for equal intervals of Au = Av = Az (after Hubbert, 1967).

At every point in a carrier-reservoir rock, uj,c, which is proportional to the hydrocarbon potential, cam be determined from the elevation z and the value of vj,c. which can be calculated from the groimdwater potential (Figure 8.7). The UVZ mapping procedure results in maps or cross-sections showing hydrocarbon equipotential surfaces in carrier-reservoir rocks from which hydrocarbon migration directions and potential trapping positions can be derived (Figures 8.8 and 8.9). 

Fig. 2 Ab initio calculations for the ground state APES of the ozone molecule [12-14] (a) equipotential contours showing three minima of three equivalent obtuse-triangular distortions and a shallow minimum (in the centre) of the undistorted regular-triangular configuration [12] (b) cross section of the APES along one of the minima [13,14] (a is the angle at the distinguished oxygen atom in the isosceles configuration)...

We selected a few sections containing wells for which analyses can provide some information about the groundwater flow. Fig. 4 is a water-level map of the Madrid aquifer and Fig. 5 shows three sections, along directions which are parallel to the water flow as deduced from the equipotential lines in Fig. 4. 

The two-dimensional case is clearly more difficult. Even for a current-biased sample the current density in the perturbed region does not have to remain constant, and it is only the integral of the current density over a complete cross-sectional area which stays constant. A quantitative LTSEM analysis of Tc variations is possible only under some restrictive conditions. An example would be the case where the current flow is essentially one-dimensional (along the x-direction) and the equipotential lines are predominantly parallel to the y-direction. However, qualitative results can always be obtained in the more complicated general case, and in many cases spatial inhomogeneities of can be detected. 

---