Equilibrium constant relation between forms

This reaction between s-trinitrotoluene and ethoxide ion, elegantly studied by Caldin and Long (47), is a reversible one to form a purple solution. By spectroscopic techniques it is possible to measure the forward rate, the reverse rate and the equilibrium constant. Although the form of the kinetic equations does not permit a differentiatimi between a proton transfer process and an addition process, the authors favor the former explanation, attributing the purple color to formation of the anion XII, and citing as evidence the deuterium exchange experiment and the fact that trinitrotoluene, in the presence of ethoxide ion or pyridine, acts as a nucleophile toward benzaldehyde. The purple solution is decolorized by a series of weak acids at rates which are related to the dissociation constants of the acids and measurable at temperatures from — 80° to -f-20°. 

The units of AG are joules (or kilojoules), with a value that depends not only on E, but also on the amount n (in moles) of electrons transferred in the reaction. Thus, in reaction A, n = 2 mol. As in the discussion of the relation between Gibbs free energy and equilibrium constants (Section 9.3), we shall sometimes need to use this relation in its molar form, with n interpreted as a pure number (its value with the unit mol struck out). Then we write... 

To deduce the relation between rate constants and equilibrium constants, we note that the equilibrium constant for a chemical reaction in solution that has the form A + B C + D is... 

The symbol (a) denotes an adsorbed species. If all steps are at equilibrium and if the second step is believed to be rate controlling, what relation must exist between the overall equilibrium constant and the observed rate constants The rate of the forward reaction is to be taken as k2CH2 where k2 is the rate constant observed for the forward reaction. Start by determining the appropriate form of the rate constant observed for the reverse reaction in terms of the kt values used above. 

The thermodynamic stability of a complex ML formed from an acceptor metal ion M and ligand groups L may be approached in two different but related ways. (The difference between the two approaches lies in the way in which the formation reaction is presented.) Consistent with preceding sections, an equilibrium constant may be written for the formation reaction. This is the formation constant Kv In a simple approach, the effects of the solvent and ionic charges may be ignored. A stepwise representation of the reaction enables a series of stepwise formation constants to be written (Table 3.5). 

The concentration for free CD ([H]) and free guest ([G]) can be substituted by the analytical concentration of CD and guest ([H]0 and [G]0) and the association rate constant can be related to the equilibrium constant between the guest and host (k+ — K k-) leading to Equation (21). This form of the equation is necessary when neither the host or guest concentrations are in excess. 

A second and related consequence in aliphatic nitro compounds is the acidification of the directly bonded CH unit through the attendant stabilization of the derived conjugate bases (5,6). As with all delocalized anions, reprotonation gives rise to tautomers, the original C-nitro compound (I) and the oci-nitro or isonitro form (II), Eq. 2.1. The aci-nitro tautomers are typically present in very minor concentrations, with equilibrium constants (A eq) between 10 and 10 (7). Alkylation of the delocalized anion leads to both a-substituted nitro compounds and the regioisomeric nitronic esters (nitronates). Nitronates were described as early as 1894 (8), however, the first isolated nitronic ester was obtained several years later upon the addition of diazomethane to phenylazonitromethane (1), Eq. 2.2 (9). 

The simplest one-constant limitation concept cannot be applied to all systems. There is another very simple case based on exclusion of "fast equilibria" A Ay. In this limit, the ratio of reaction constants Kij — kij/kji is bounded, 0equilibrium constant", even if there is no relevant thermodynamics.) Ray (1983) discussed that case systematically for some real examples. Of course, it is possible to create the theory for that case very similarly to the theory presented above. This should be done, but it is worth to mention now that the limitation concept can be applied to any modular structure of reaction network. Let for the reaction network if the set of elementary reactions is partitioned on some modules — U j. We can consider the related multiscale ensemble of reaction constants let the ratio of any two-rate constants inside each module be bounded (and separated from zero, of course), but the ratios between modules form a well-separated ensemble. This can be formalized by multiplication of rate constants of each module on a timescale coefficient fc,. If we assume that In fc, are uniformly and independently distributed on a real line (or fc, are independently and log-uniformly distributed on a sufficiently large interval) then we come to the problem of modular limitation. The problem is quite general describe the typical behavior of multiscale ensembles for systems with given modular structure each module has its own timescale and these time scales are well separated. 

In Eq. (LL), M is the concentration of the condensed-phase organic (in igm 3) available to absorb semivolatile organic products, ( is a constant that relates the concentration of the ith secondary organic aerosol component formed, C, to the amount of parent precursor organic reacted i.e., C, (ng m ) 1000a, A(parent organic in p,g m 3), and Kom i is the gas-particle partioning coefficient for the ith component. As discussed in more detail in Section D, Kim j is in effect an equilibrium constant between the condensed- and gas-phase concentrations. 

Empirical equations of the form T = aF + bD + c, expressing the relation between total solids (T), fat (F), and density (D), have been used for years. Such derivations assume constant values for the density of the fat and of the mixture of solids-not-fat which enter into the calculation of the coefficients (a, b, and c). Since milk fat has a high coefficient of expansion and contracts as it solidifies (note that the solid-liquid equilibrium is established slowly), the temperature of measurement and the previous history of the product must be controlled carefully (see Sharp and Hart 1936). Variations in the composition of... 

If we write Equation 2.50 in the form of Equation 2.51, we see at once a resemblance to the familiar relation 2.52 between the equilibrium constant of a... 

The Mass Action Model The mass action model represents a very different approach to the interpretation of the thermodynamic properties of a surfactant solution than does the pseudo-phase model presented in the previous section. A chemical equilibrium is assumed to exist between the monomer and the micelle. For this reaction an equilibrium constant can be written to relate the activity (concentrations) of monomer and micelle present. The most comprehensive treatment of this process is due to Burchfield and Woolley.22 We will now describe the procedure followed, although we will not attempt to fill in all the steps of the derivation. The aggregation of an anionic surfactant MA is approximated by a simple equilibrium in which the monomeric anion and cation combine to form one aggregate species (micelle) having an aggregation number n, with a fraction of bound counterions, f3. The reaction isdd... 

Linear free energy relationships describe the proportionality between rates and equilibria observed in many reactions of structurally related compounds. They have the general form of Equation 9.18 where kQ and k are rate constants of a parent compound and a second compound in the reaction under test, and K0 and K are the equilibrium constants for a (different) reversible reference reaction of compounds having the same structural relationship as the first pair ... 

Equation 8.4 is obtained by successive insertions of Equations 8.2 and 8.3 into Equation 8.1. The rate constant k of Equation 8.4 can also be written in the form of Equation 8.5 which is the Arrhenius law. In addition, one can rewrite the equilibrium constant Keq of the conformer equilibrium B s C as Equation 8.6, which relates Keq to the energy difference between C and B. 

---