Equations adsorber

Tadros [133] predicted an increase in the thickness of adsorbed polyvinyl alcohol layer at the paraffin-water interface with increasing bulk concentration from 3.5 nm at 1 ppm to 67.7 nm at 20 ppm. It is doubtful, however, whether it is possible solely on the evidence of results from application of Equation 8.35, to confirm multilayer formation. Kayes [134] has calculated using this equation, adsorbed layer thicknesses on solid particles for alkyl polyoxyethylene monoethers of 3.2 and 9.2 nm for derivatives with 30 and 60 ethylene oxide residues, respectively, which approximates to monolayer coverage. 

Gibbs equation of surface concentration This equation relates the surface tension (y) of a solution and the amount (T) of the solute adsorbed at unit area of the surface. For a single non-ionic solute in dilute solution the equation approximates to... 

Langmuir adsorption isotherm A theoretical equation, derived from the kinetic theory of gases, which relates the amount of gas adsorbed at a plane solid surface to the pressure of gas in equilibrium with the surface. In the derivation it is assumed that the adsorption is restricted to a monolayer at the surface, which is considered to be energetically uniform. It is also assumed that there is no interaction between the adsorbed species. The equation shows that at a gas pressure, p, the fraction, 0, of the surface covered by the adsorbate is given by ... 

Although still used the Langmuir equation is only of limited value since in practice surfaces are energetic inhomogeneous and interactions between adsorbed species often occur. 

These surface active agents have weaker intermoiecular attractive forces than the solvent, and therefore tend to concentrate in the surface at the expense of the water molecules. The accumulation of adsorbed surface active agent is related to the change in surface tension according to the Gibbs adsorption equation... 

While Eq. III-18 has been verified for small droplets, attempts to do so for liquids in capillaries (where Rm is negative and there should be a pressure reduction) have led to startling discrepancies. Potential problems include the presence of impurities leached from the capillary walls and allowance for the film of adsorbed vapor that should be present (see Chapter X). There is room for another real effect arising from structural peiturbations in the liquid induced by the vicinity of the solid capillary wall (see Chapter VI). Fisher and Israelachvili [19] review much of the literature on the verification of the Kelvin equation and report confirmatory measurements for liquid bridges between crossed mica cylinders. The situation is similar to that of the meniscus in a capillary since Rm is negative some of their results are shown in Fig. III-3. Studies in capillaries have been reviewed by Melrose [20] who concludes that the Kelvin equation is obeyed for radii at least down to 1 fim. 

If the surface tension of a liquid is lowered by the addition of a solute, then, by the Gibbs equation, the solute must be adsorbed at the interface. This adsorption may amount to enough to correspond to a monomolecular layer of solute on the surface. For example, the limiting value of in Fig. Ill-12 gives an area per molecule of 52.0 A, which is about that expected for a close-packed... 

The succeeding material is broadly organized according to the types of experimental quantities measured because much of the literature is so grouped. In the next chapter spread monolayers are discussed, and in later chapters the topics of adsorption from solution and of gas adsorption are considered. Irrespective of the experimental compartmentation, the conclusions as to the nature of mobile adsorbed films, that is, their structure and equations of state, will tend to be of a general validity. Thus, only a limited discussion of Gibbs monolayers has been given here, and none of such related aspects as the contact potentials of solutions or of adsorption at liquid-liquid interfaces, as it is more efficient to treat these topics later. 

A 1.5% by weight aqueous surfactant solution has a surface tension of 53.8 dyn/cm (or mN/m) at 20°C. (a) Calculate a, the area of surface containing one molecule. State any assumptions that must be made to make the calculation from the preceding data, (b) The additional information is now supplied that a 1.7% solution has a surface tension of 53.6 dyn/cm. If the surface-adsorbed film obeys the equation of state ir(o - 00) = kT, calculate from the combined data a value of 00, the actual area of a molecule. 

Derive the equation of state, that is, the relationship between t and a, of the adsorbed film for the case of a surface active electrolyte. Assume that the activity coefficient for the electrolyte is unity, that the solution is dilute enough so that surface tension is a linear function of the concentration of the electrolyte, and that the electrolyte itself (and not some hydrolyzed form) is the surface-adsorbed species. Do this for the case of a strong 1 1 electrolyte and a strong 1 3 electrolyte. 

This rule is approximately obeyed by a large number of systems, although there are many exceptions see Refs. 15-18. The rule can be understood in terms of a simple physical picture. There should be an adsorbed film of substance B on the surface of liquid A. If we regard this film to be thick enough to have the properties of bulk liquid B, then 7a(B) is effectively the interfacial tension of a duplex surface and should be equal to 7ab + VB(A)- Equation IV-6 then follows. See also Refs. 14 and 18. 

Assume that an aqueous solute adsorbs at the mercury-water interface according to the Langmuir equation x/xm = bc/( + be), where Xm is the maximum possible amount and x/x = 0.5 at C = 0.3Af. Neglecting activity coefficient effects, estimate the value of the mercury-solution interfacial tension when C is Q.IM. The limiting molecular area of the solute is 20 A per molecule. The temperature is 25°C. 

The treatments that are concerned in more detail with the nature of the adsorbed layer make use of the general thermodynamic framework of the derivation of the Gibbs equation (Section III-5B) but differ in the handling of the electrochemical potential and the surface excess of the ionic species [114-117]. The derivation given here is after that of Grahame and Whitney [117]. Equation III-76 gives the combined first- and second-law statements for the surface excess quantities... 

Assume that a salt, MX (1 1 type), adsorbs at the mercury-water interface according to the Langmuir equation ... 

A fractal surface of dimension D = 2.5 would show an apparent area A app that varies with the cross-sectional area a of the adsorbate molecules used to cover it. Derive the equation relating 31 app and a. Calculate the value of the constant in this equation for 3l app in and a in A /molecule if 1 /tmol of molecules of 18 A cross section will cover the surface. What would A app be if molecules of A were used ... 

The surface excess per square centimeter F is just n/E, where n is the moles adsorbed per gram and E is the specific surface area. By means of the Gibbs equation (111-80), one can write the relationship... 

Equations X-12 and X-13 thus provide a thermodynamic evaluation of the change in interfacial free energy accompanying adsorption. As discussed further in Section X-5C, typical values of v for adsorbed films on solids range up to 100 ergs/cm. ... 

Various functional forms for / have been proposed either as a result of empirical observation or in terms of specific models. A particularly important example of the latter is that known as the Langmuir adsorption equation [2]. By analogy with the derivation for gas adsorption (see Section XVII-3), the Langmuir model assumes the surface to consist of adsorption sites, each having an area a. All adsorbed species interact only with a site and not with each other, and adsorption is thus limited to a monolayer. Related lattice models reduce to the Langmuir model under these assumptions [3,4]. In the case of adsorption from solution, however, it seems more plausible to consider an alternative phrasing of the model. Adsorption is still limited to a monolayer, but this layer is now regarded as an ideal two-dimensional solution of equal-size solute and solvent molecules of area a. Thus lateral interactions, absent in the site picture, cancel out in the ideal solution however, in the first version is a properly of the solid lattice, while in the second it is a properly of the adsorbed species. Both models attribute differences in adsorption behavior entirely to differences in adsorbate-solid interactions. Both present adsorption as a competition between solute and solvent. 

Here, denotes the total number of moles associated with the adsorbed layer, and N and are the respective mole fractions in that layer and in solution at equilibrium. As before, it is assumed, for convenience, that mole numbers refer to that amount of system associated with one gram of adsorbent. Equation XI-24 may be written... 

An adsorbed film obeys a modified Amagat equation of state, t(t = qkT (see Eq. ni-107). Show that this corresponds to a Freundlich adsorption isotherm (Eq. XI-12) and comment on the situation. 

The Washburn equation has most recently been confirmed for water and cyclohexane in glass capillaries ranging from 0.3 to 400 fim in radii [46]. The contact angle formed by a moving meniscus may differ, however, from the static one [46, 47]. Good and Lin [48] found a difference in penetration rate between an outgassed capillary and one with a vapor adsorbed film, and they propose that the driving force be modified by a film pressure term. 

This difference looks large enough to be diagnostic of the state of the adsorbed film. However, to be consistent with the kinetic derivation of the Langmuir equation, it was necessary to suppose that the site acted as a potential box and, furthermore, that a weak adsorption bond of ifi corresponding to 1 /tq was present. With these provisions we obtain... 

A variety of experimental data has been found to fit the Langmuir equation reasonably well. Data are generally plotted according to the linear form, Eq. XVn-9, to obtain the constants b and n from the best fitting straight line. The specific surface area, E, can then be obtained from Eq. XVII-10. A widely used practice is to take to be the molecular area of the adsorbate, estimated from liquid or solid adsorbate densities. On the other hand, the Langmuir model is cast around the concept of adsorption sites, whose spacing one would suppose to be characteristic of the adsorbent. See Section XVII-5B for an additional discussion of the problem. 

The basic assumption is that the Langmuir equation applies to each layer, with the added postulate that for the first layer the heat of adsorption Q may have some special value, whereas for all succeeding layers, it is equal to Qu, the heat of condensation of the liquid adsorbate. A furfter assumption is that evaporation and condensation can occur only from or on exposed surfaces. As illustrated in Fig. XVII-9, the picture is one of portions of uncovered surface 5o, of surface covered by a single layer 5, by a double-layer 52. and so on.f The condition for equilibrium is taken to be that the amount of each type of surface reaches a steady-state value with respect to the next-deeper one. Thus for 5o... 

Isotherms Based on the Equation of State of the Adsorbed Film... 

The first term on the right is the common inverse cube law, the second is taken to be the empirically more important form for moderate film thickness (and also conforms to the polarization model, Section XVII-7C), and the last term allows for structural perturbation in the adsorbed film relative to bulk liquid adsorbate. In effect, the vapor pressure of a thin multilayer film is taken to be P and to relax toward P as the film thickens. The equation has been useful in relating adsorption isotherms to contact angle behavior (see Section X-7). Roy and Halsey [73] have used a similar equation earlier, Halsey [74] allowed for surface heterogeneity by assuming a distribution of Uq values in Eq. XVII-79. Dubinin s equation (Eq. XVII-75) has been mentioned another variant has been used by Bonnetain and co-workers [7S]. 

A seemingly more stringent test would be to determine whether the ratios of areas for various solids as obtained by means of a given isotherm equation are independent of the nature of the adsorbate. The data summarized in Table XVII-3 were selected from the literature mainly because each author had obtained areas for two or more solids using two or more adsorbates. It is seen... 

We conclude with the matter of adsorbate-adsorbate interactions these give rise to deviations from Henry s law behavior. These may be expressed in the form of a virial equation, much as is done for imperfect gases. Following Steele [8], one can write... 

I. Adsorption Heats and Entropies. It is not necessary, phenomenologically, to state whether the process is adsorption, absorption, or solution, and for the adsorbent-adsorbate complex formal equations can be written, such as... 

Brunauer (see Refs. 136-138) defended these defects as deliberate approximations needed to obtain a practical two-constant equation. The assumption of a constant heat of adsorption in the first layer represents a balance between the effects of surface heterogeneity and of lateral interaction, and the assumption of a constant instead of a decreasing heat of adsorption for the succeeding layers balances the overestimate of the entropy of adsorption. These comments do help to explain why the model works as well as it does. However, since these approximations are inherent in the treatment, one can see why the BET model does not lend itself readily to any detailed insight into the real physical nature of multilayers. In summary, the BET equation will undoubtedly maintain its usefulness in surface area determinations, and it does provide some physical information about the nature of the adsorbed film, but only at the level of approximation inherent in the model. Mainly, the c value provides an estimate of the first layer heat of adsorption, averaged over the region of fit. 

---