Enzyme substrate relationships

Once one finds out which of two stereoheterotopic ligands or faces of a substrate is involved in an enzyme-catalyzed reaction, one is in a position to make a meaningful statement as to the location of the substrate in relation to the active site of the enzyme. While considerations of prostereoisomerism are thus useful in helping elucidate the enzyme-substrate relationship in the activated complex of an enzyme-mediated reaction, it must also be stressed that such considerations in themselves are insufficient to provide the complete picture and that they must necessarily be supplemented by many other techniques in enzyme chemistry. 

The temporal sequence imposed in vivo on repair of single, often complex, chromatin DSB lesions is difficult if not impossible to recapitulate in vitro. It is thus advisable to take genetic data as a primary reference point for understanding NHR mechanisms. In vitro analyses nonetheless allow focused study of enzymes properties, and structural biology will continue to be irreplaceable in elucidating enzyme-substrate relationships. 

Fig. 6.1 Michaelis-Menten Curve and Enzyme-Substrate Relationship...

Relating Concepts How is the receptor-odorant relationship similar to an enzyme-substrate relationship ... 

Enzyme-Substrate Relationships Among iS-Glucan Hydrolases... 

One of the most fruitful methods of exploring enzyme-substrate relationships is to test a variety of compounds chemically related to the substrate, for their ability to react with or to inhibit the action of the enzyme. This approach has been fully exploited for /3-glucosidases (73, 86, 220), and similar studies relating to / -glucan hydrolases will be discussed in this chapter. 

To explain the selective reactivity of only one of the two identical groups, the Ogston theory further postulates that the reactivity is different at each of the points of attachment of the enzyme with the substrate. The three-point attachment theory thus explains how symmetrical organic molecules can be acted upon by an enzyme as if they presented a specific type of stereoisomerism. However, the absolute enzyme-substrate relationship remains unknown. In addition to citric acid, several other symmetrical substrates are known to be specifically oriented by their enzymes. 

Our own studies using very crude preparations, from a variety of sources, of enzymes converting saturated to monoenoic and monoenoic to dienoic acids have shed some light on enzyme-substrate relationships. With this as a basis and using the data and ideas from many workers, especially Klenk, Holman, van Dorp, Mead, Stof-fel, Sprecher, and Brenner and their colleagues (for references see later) this paper makes an attempt at interpretation of the pathways that leads to an apparent simplification. 

Fig. 2 An enzyme-substrate relationship for enzymatic reactions. A Key and Lock theory valid for all in vivo reactions. B An enzyme forming a complex with an artificial substrate to induce an in vitro enzymatic reaction...

In this form, Alhas the units of torr.) The relationship defined by Equation (A15.4) plots as a hyperbola. That is, the MbOg saturation curve resembles an enzyme substrate saturation curve. For myoglobin, a partial pressure of 1 torr for jbOg is sufficient for half-saturation (Figure A15.1). We can define as the partial pressure of Og at which 50% of the myoglobin molecules have a molecule of Og bound (that is, F= 0.5), then... 

An inhibitor that binds exclusively to the free enzyme (i.e., for which a = °°) is said to be competitive because the binding of the inhibitor and the substrate to the enzyme are mutually exclusive hence these inhibitors compete with the substrate for the pool of free enzyme molecules. Referring back to the relationships between the steady state kinetic constants and the steps in catalysis (Figure 2.8), one would expect inhibitors that conform to this mechanism to affect the apparent value of KM (which relates to formation of the enzyme-substrate complex) and VmJKM, but not the value of Vmax (which relates to the chemical steps subsequent to ES complex formation). The presence of a competitive inhibitor thus influences the steady state velocity equation as described by Equation (3.1) ... 

Work in solution is an absolute prerequisite for further studies of enzyme-substrate intermediates in the crystalline state. According to the Arrhenius relationship, k = A exp(—E IRT), which relates the rate constant k to the temperature, reactions normally occurring in the second to minute ranges might be sufficiently decreased in rate at subzero temperatures to permit intermediates to be stabilized, and occasionally purified by column chromatography if reactions are carried out in fluid solvent mixtures. Therefore, the first problem is to find a suitable cryoprotective solvent for the protein in question. 

The ability to biosynthetically incorporate noncoded amino acids into proteins site-specifically has facilitated studies not previously possible. These include studies of protein stability, the initiation of protein translation, electron transfer, protein-protein and protein-membrane interactions, reversal of enzyme substrate specificity, and structure-function relationships, among others. A growing number of research labs have begun to report applications of this technique. A brief look at some recent applications of the suppression mutagenesis technique follows. 

These principles are similar to those that govern the relationship between an enzyme and its catalytic activity. For the hormone, R is equivalent to the enzyme, H to the substrate, and hormone-receptor complex to the enzyme-substrate complex. The activity of the substrate effector system is similar to the transition state. The cellnlar response to the hormone is similar to the catalytic role of the enzyme in the cell (Chapter 3),... 

The derivation of initial-velocity equations for any rapid equilibrium system is quite simple. When the equilibrium relationships among various enzyme-substrate complexes are defined, the rate equation can be written simply by inspection. Consider the one-substrate system... 

Allosteric enzymes show relationships between V0 and [S] that differ from Michaelis-Menten kinetics. They do exhibit saturation with the substrate when [S] is sufficiently high, but for some allosteric enzymes, plots of V0 versus [S] (Fig. 6-29) produce a sigmoid saturation curve, rather than the hyperbolic curve typical of non-regulatory enzymes. On the sigmoid saturation curve we can find a value of [S] at which V0 is half-maximal, but we cannot refer to it with the designation Km, because the enzyme does not follow the hyperbolic Michaelis-Menten relationship. Instead, the symbol [S]0 e or K0,5 is often used to represent the substrate concentration giving half-maximal velocity of the reaction catalyzed by an allosteric enzyme (Fig. 6-29). 

Using this equation, together with a mass balance relationship ([E] = [E]t - [ES]), we can solve for [ES]/[E]t, the fraction of enzyme combined as enzyme-substrate complex (Eq. 9-18). 

The result of equation 3.39 for nonproductive binding is quite general. It applies to cases in which intermediates occur on the reaction pathway as well as in the nonproductive modes. For example, in equation 3.19 for the action of chy-motrypsin on esters with accumulation of an acylenzyme, it is seen from the ratios of equations 3.21 and 3.22 that kQJKM = k2IKs. This relationship clearly breaks down for the Briggs-Haldane mechanism in which the enzyme-substrate complex is not in thermodynamic equilibrium with the free enzyme and substrates. It should be borne in mind that KM might be a complex function when there are several enzyme-bound intermediates in rapid equilibrium, as in equation 3.16. Here kcJKM is a function of all the bound species. 

Although it is only for the simple Michaelis-Menten mechanism or in similar cases that Ku = Ks, the true dissociation constant of the enzyme-substrate complex, Km may be treated for some purposes as an apparent dissociation constant. For example, the concentration of free enzyme in solution may be calculated from the relationship... 

The velocity term, v, in Equation Cl.1.2 refers to measured initial velocities. The equation s derivation is based on the assumptions that enzyme concentrations are much less than substrate concentrations ([E]tota [S]) and that, over the course of the assay, the concentration of the enzyme-substrate complex remains essentially constant (the steady-state assumption). The point of this discussion is to show that measured initial velocities are expected to be directly proportional to the amount of active enzyme in reaction mixtures. Equation Cl. 1.5, obtained by substituting and rearranging the equations above, more clearly illustrates this relationship. 

The rate of reaction at low substrate concentration is proportional to the saturation rate, kB, and concentration of the array of enzyme-substrate complexes, which is proportional to l/Km thus, the rate is proportional to ks/Km. Since stabilization of the complex by changing pH, for example, increases the concentration of the complex at the same time as it decreases the probability of activation to a transition state, the net result is that k /Km is related to the free energy of the activated complex relative to the unbound enzyme, an unbound substrate. The pH profile of ke/Km thus potentially reveals the pK values of groups on the free enzyme and free substrate that are involved significantly in rate limiting processes. This well-known relationship has been used to establish the pIC values of 5.4 and 6.4 for groups on the enzyme in 0.2 M KC1 for both... 

---