Enzyme linked immunosorbent assay immunohistochemistry

In situ hybridization overcomes the problem of cellular localization, but it is difficult to relate the expression of a particular mRNA to the expression of the functional protein. Moreover, this method is difficult to carry out. Immunohistochemistry, on the other hand, is a relatively simple technique that overcomes these problems by identifying the precise cellular localization of the functional protein. This technique, using paraffin sections, provides information on the ER status of tumors very simply and rapidly. In addition, this approach is superior to frozen section immunohistochemistry, the dextran-coated charcoal assay (DCC) (see page 276), or the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for predicting the response to endocrine therapy. 

Note. ELISA = enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, FACS = fluorescence-activated cell sorting, HPLC = high-performance liquid chromatography, IHC = immunohistochemistry, LC/MS = liquid chromatography/MS = mass spectrometry, LPS = lipopolysaccharide (endotoxin), NA = not applicable, PAHA = (nonhuman) primate anti-human antibodies. 

Note CHO = Chinese hamster ovary cells, ELISA = enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, FACS = fluorescent-activated cell sorting or flow cytometry IHC = immunohistochemistry, LBI = ligand-binding inhibition, rec = recovery, RMN = rat micronucleus. 

Use of immunohistochemistry, immunoblotting, and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay to detect the partially proteinase resistant form of the prion (PrP ) protein. 

Cell-enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (cell-ELISA) is an useful technique for the quantitative analysis of cell surface antigen expression that was developed on the basis of enzyme immunohistochemistry (EIH) and ELISA. Since its development, which was made possible by the establishment of monoclonal antibody technology, a wide range of cell types and surface molecules were analyzed by cell-ELISA. Here we show four variants of this method and provide a brief comparison of cell-ELISA with flow cytometry (FACS) and radioimmunobinding assay (BIA), which are other methods for the quantitative detection of cell-surface molecules. We describe step-by-step procedures for both direct and indirect cell-ELISA using either adherent or nonadherent live cells. 

Antigen-capture enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) testing, IgM-capture ELISA, polymerase chain reaction (PCR), and virus isolation can be used to confirm a case of Marburg hemorrhagic fever within a few days of the onset of symptoms. The IgG-capture ELISA is appropriate for testing persons later in the course of disease or after recovery. The disease is readily diagnosed by immunohistochemistry, virus isolation, or PCR of blood or tissue specimens from deceased patients. 

ELISA or enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays originated from the use of enzyme-antibody (eg. horse-radish peroxidase) complexes for immunohistochemistry. The same principles of spectrophotometric measurement have been employed for the measurement of antibodies (eg. Engvall, 1976 Leinikki and Passila, 1975) or the detection of viruses (Voller et al., 1976b). 

---