Environmental standards remediation

Each law attempts to achieve specific goals by setting environmental standards for different classes of hazardous waste. Treatment technologies are researched by universities and companies and implemented by the environmental remediation industry. 

Austria as a tourism country has high environmental standards. Environmental protection, therefore, is given appreciable priority there. Accordingly, research in the area of environmental protection and remediation is well accepted and supported. Only a few of the various activities will be reported here. 

Means, R.S. 2005. Environmental Remediation. Cost Data-assemblies. 11th ed. R.S. Means Company Englewood, CO Talisman Partners. This book includes pricing for more than seventy standard remediation technologies and related tasks, and includes costs for every kind and size of project. 

US-Environmental Protection Agency, Draft Environmental Impact Statement for Remedial Action Standards for Inactive Uranium Processing Sites (40 CFR 192), US-EPA Rep. No. EPA 520/4-80-011 (1980). 

Before standards for indoor exposure to radon can be formally established, work is necessary to determine whether remedies are feasible and what is likely to be involved. Meanwhile, the Royal Commission on Environmental Pollution (RCEP) in the UK has considered standards for indoor exposure to radon decay products (RCEP, 1984). For existing dwellings, the RCEP has recommended an action level of 25 mSv in a year and that priority should be given to devising effective remedial measures. An effective dose equivalent of 25 mSv per year is taken to correspond to an average radon concentration of about 900 Bq m 3 or an average radon decay-product concentration of about 120 mWL, with the assumption of an equilibrium factor of 0.5 and an occupancy factor of 0.83. 

Each project has its own unique characteristic physical, environmental, cultural, and regulatory setting. No single approach (technology, process, or cleanup standard) can be universally applied. The following sections discuss the key elements that impact the economic decisions of remediation projects and result in the most efficient, cost-effective restoration. 

The most cost-effective, technically feasible remediation procedures are not always in agreement with regulatory controls. Environmental regulations, by their very nature, must be applicable for a wide variety of settings and must protect the overall environment. In past years remediation standards were established as general numerical concentrations usually based on drinking water standards or other health-related criteria borrowed from related public health fields. This type of remediation was often generic, not site specific. 

Cost of cleanup is usually directly proportional to the cleanup standard. In practice, the cost of remediation is highest where human or environmental risk is greatest. Established industrial areas that will remain in that use category will have higher acceptable cleanup concentrations than will residential or commercial areas. 

EPA = Environmental Protection Agency FDA = Food and Drug Administration NPDES = National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System OERR = Office of Emergency and Remedial Response OSW = Office of Solid Waste OTS = Office of Toxic Substances OWRS = Office of Water Regulations and Standards... 

EPA = Environmental Protection Agency OERR = Office of Emergency and Remedial Response- OWRS Regulations and Standards OSW = Office of Solid Waste. 

Once a polymer is fuUy saturated, the physical tests described above can be conducted with confidence. Naturally, minimizing the evaporation of water should be considered. The one exception in this new category of testing is flow of water through the foam. This is not covered in the standard but will be very important for some applications, particularly in environmental remediation. If the intent is to build a biofilter or a continuous flow enzyme reactor, we must know the hydrodynamic properties of the materials we produce. Since polyurethanes are rarely used in these environments, the flow of water even through a reticulated foam is not described by the manufacturers. Furthermore, if we are to make composites of reticulated foams, the amount of polymer grafted to the surface will have a dominating effect on the flow of water. In a later chapter, we will describe our work in this area. 

From our perspective there are two ways to address these problems (1) to establish and support less stringent cleanup standards, and/or (2) to develop and implement more cost-efficient, effective remediation technologies. The scope and magnitude of the environmental contamination problems in the U.S. are such that a combination of these two options will be required. 

---