Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Environmental Protection Agency revisions

United States Environmental Protection Agency, Revision of TSCA Test guidelines, Fed. Reg., Vol. 51, No. 9, p. 1542, 1986. [Pg.405]

EPA. 1988a. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Subpart B - Schedule for land disposal prohibition and establishment of treatment standards. 40 CFR 268.11. Environmental Protection Agency Revised as of July 1, 1988. [Pg.118]

EPA (US Environmental Protection Agency) (revised July 1, 1997), Guidelines establishing test procedures for the analysis ofpollutants (App. B, Part 136, Definition and procedures for the determination of the method detection limit) U.S. Code of Federal Regulations, Title 40. [Pg.690]

National Priorities List, 1st Edition, October 1984 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Revised periodically. [Pg.321]

Winges, K. D., User s Guide for the Fugitive Dust Model (FDM) (revised), EPA-910/9-88-202R. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 10, Seattle, WA, 1990. [Pg.341]

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Guideline on Ait Quality Models (Revised). EPA-450/4-80-023R. Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards. Research Triangle Park, NC, 1986. (NTIS Accession Number PB86-245 248.)... [Pg.342]

Sources Air Quality Criteria for Ozone and Other Photochemical Oxidants, EPA 600/8-78-004. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC, April 1978 Revisions to National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Photochemical Oxidants, Fed. Reg. Part V, Feb. 9, 1979, pp. 8202-8237,... [Pg.373]

The states are required to submit to the federal Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) plans, known as State Implementation Plans (SIP), showing how they will achieve the standards in their jurisdictions within a specified time period. If after that time period there are areas within the states where these standards have not been attained, the states are required to submit and obtain EPA approval of revised plans to achieve the standards in these "nonattainment" areas. EPA also designates certain areas where the standards are being met, but which have the potential for future nonattainment, as Air Quality Maintenance Areas (AQMA). Such regions have stricter requirements than attainment areas for the granting of permits for new sources of the pollutant not in attainment status. [Pg.378]

Environmental Protection Agency, 1977. Guidelines for Air Quality Maintenance Planning and Analysis, Volume 10 (Revised) Procedures for Evaluating Air Quality Impact of New Stationary Sources. EPA-450/4-77-001 (OAQPS Number 1.2029R), Research Triangle Park, NC. [Pg.343]

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (1997). EPA s Revised Particulate Matter Standards. Pact Sheet (July). Washington, DC U.S. Government Printing Office. Utility Data Institute. (1995). UDI Sees Electricity Demand Surging with Global Economy. Wind Energy Weekly o. 648 (May 29). [Pg.449]

EPA 500 Series, Method 507, Revision 2.0, US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC (1989). [Pg.446]

Environmental Protection Agency Instruction 10 CFR Ch. 1 (7-1-94 Edition) Appendix B to Part 136 - Definition and Procedure for the Determination of the Method Detection Limit - Revision 1.11, US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC (1994). [Pg.497]

US Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, Environmental Investigations Standard Operating Procedures and Quality Assurance Manual, Sections 1-18, EPA, Athens GA (1996 with 1997 revisions). [Pg.816]

FIFRA Scientific Advisory Panel Meeting Report, Review of Proposed Revised Guidehnes for Conducting Terrestrial Field Dissipation Studies , SAP Report No. 90-01, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, p. 32 (1998). [Pg.890]

U.S. EPA, Compatibility Test for Wastes and Membrane Liners, EPA Method 9090A, Revision 1, July 1992, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, http //www.epa.gov/epaoswer/hazwaste/test/pdfs/9090a. pdf, 2009. [Pg.1153]

U.S. EPA, A Citizen s Guide to Radon, The Guide to Protecting Yourself and Your Family from Radon, EPA 402-K02-006, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, Revised September 2005. [Pg.1299]

Just as with the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) standards, these will also be added to and revised. They are given in the Code of Federal Regulations, under Title 29 (Labor), Chapter 17, Part 1910.13 To keep up to date one should follow the same procedure given previously for EPA standards. [Pg.93]

EPA released the first case study of cumulative risks from 24 OPs in food for scientific review in mid-2000. Public comments were solicited and several scientific panel (SAP) meetings were held on various aspects of EPA s quantitative methods. In December 2001 a preliminary OP-CRA (cumulative risk assessment) was released, this time encompassing 30 OPs, additional foods, more residue data and all major routes of exposure. Public comments were solicited again and another series of SAP meetings were held. The revised final OP-CRA was issued in June 2002 after more than 20 SAP meetings and four rounds of public comment (US Environmental Protection Agency, 2002). It is the most sophisticated and data-rich pesticide risk assessment ever carried out. [Pg.287]

US Environmental Protection Agency (20002). OPP Revised OP Risk Assessment -Cumulative Risk From Pesticides in Foods. l.C.l—1.C.24. [Pg.296]


See other pages where Environmental Protection Agency revisions is mentioned: [Pg.28]    [Pg.318]    [Pg.28]    [Pg.318]    [Pg.77]    [Pg.15]    [Pg.405]    [Pg.468]    [Pg.343]    [Pg.545]    [Pg.4]    [Pg.43]    [Pg.714]    [Pg.4]    [Pg.5]    [Pg.4]    [Pg.5]    [Pg.4]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.19 ]




SEARCH



Environmental Protection Agency

Environmental protection

Revised

Revisions

© 2024 chempedia.info