Energy dissipation factor

The increased interfacial area in the microreactor led to an increased pressure drop. The energy dissipation factor, the power unit per reactor volume, of the microreactor process was thus higher (sv = 2-5 kW/m3) than that of the laboratory trickle-bed reactors (sv = 0.01-0.2 kW/m3) [277]. This is, however, outperformed by the still larger gain in mass transfer so that the net performance of the microreactor is better. 

The energy dissipation factor, therefore, is specific to the material being tested (for a particular indenter geometry), and changes in this property reflect changes in the material s energy dissipation during indentation. 

E = 0.8 GPa) or Marathon. Hardness and energy dissipation factors measured in DSI testing showed differences with material as well. Hylamer had higher hardness (120 MPa versus 90 MPa for GUR 1020) and higher EDF (5.8mN/pm versus GUR1020 at 4.8mN/ jm ). 

Figure 2.1 served as the basis for our initial analysis of viscosity, and we return to this representation now with the stipulation that the volume of fluid sandwiched between the two plates is a unit of volume. This unit is defined by a unit of contact area with the walls and a unit of separation between the two walls. Next we consider a shearing force acting on this cube of fluid to induce a unit velocity gradient. According to Eq. (2.6), the rate of energy dissipation per unit volume from viscous forces dW/dt is proportional to the square of the velocity gradient, with t]q (pure liquid, subscript 0) the factor of proportionality ... 

An alternative point of view assumes that each repeat unit of the polymer chain offers hydrodynamic resistance to the flow such that f-the friction factor per repeat unit-is applicable to each of the n units. This situation is called the free-draining coil. The free-draining coil is the model upon which the Debye viscosity equation is based in Chap. 2. Accordingly, we use Eq. (2.53) to give the contribution of a single polymer chain to the rate of energy dissipation ... 

The dissipation factor (the ratio of the energy dissipated to the energy stored per cycle) is affected by the frequency, temperature, crystallinity, and void content of the fabricated stmcture. At certain temperatures and frequencies, the crystalline and amorphous regions become resonant. Because of the molecular vibrations, appHed electrical energy is lost by internal friction within the polymer which results in an increase in the dissipation factor. The dissipation factor peaks for these resins correspond to well-defined transitions, but the magnitude of the variation is minor as compared to other polymers. The low temperature transition at —97° C causes the only meaningful dissipation factor peak. The dissipation factor has a maximum of 10 —10 Hz at RT at high crystallinity (93%) the peak at 10 —10 Hz is absent. 

G is called the loss modulus. It arises from the out-of-phase components of y and T and is associated with viscous energy dissipation, ie, damping. The ratio of G and G gives another measure of damping, the dissipation factor or loss tangent (often just called tan 5), which is the ratio of energy dissipated to energy stored (eq. 16). 

With good diy scrubbing sorbents, the controlling resistance for gas cleaning is external turbulent diffusion, which also depends on energy dissipated by viscous and by inertial mechanisms. It turns out to Be possible to correlate mass-transfer rate as a fimctiou of the fric tiou Factor. 

If contact with a rough surface is poor, whether as a result of thermodynamic or kinetic factors, voids at the interface are likely to mean that practical adhesion is low. Voids can act as stress concentrators which, especially with a brittle adhesive, lead to low energy dissipation, i/f, and low fracture energy, F. However, it must be recognised that there are circumstances where the stress concentrations resulting from interfacial voids can lead to enhanced plastic deformation of a ductile adhesive and increase fracture energy by an increase in [44]. 

We attempt here to reveal the acmal reasons of disparity between the theoretical predictions and measurements obtained for single-phase flow in micro-channels. For this purpose, we consider the effect of different factors (roughness, energy dissipation, etc.) on flow characteristics. Some of these factors were also discussed by Sharp et al. (2001), and Sharp and Adrian (2004). 

The relation of hydraulic diameter to channel length and the Reynolds number are important factors that determine the effect of the viscous energy dissipation on flow parameters. 

Under certain conditions the energy dissipation may lead to an oscillatory regime of laminar flow in micro-channels. The relation of hydraulic diameter to channel length and the Reynolds number are important factors that determine the effect of viscous energy dissipation on flow parameters. The oscillatory flow regime occurs in micro-channels at Reynolds numbers less than Recr- In this case the existence of velocity fluctuations does not indicate change from laminar to turbulent flow. 

Having calculated the force for a particular event the slip is calculated using the bush model and hence the energy dissipation is obtained. Using the factors of the abrasion equation, determined with the LAT 100 on an alumina surface the abrasion loss for each event is calculated. The forces are different for a driven and a nondriven axle and accordingly different abrasion rates will result. 

Numerous researchers have studied damage to micro-organisms during flow in pipes, (Fig. 11) [87,88] Most researchers use a Fanning friction factor, f, to calculate the energy dissipation rate for fully developed flow in tubular bioreactors and capillary flow devices. There are minor differences in the equations that are used but they are generally of the following form [89,901 ... 

If V v = 0, e,s(l/2)m in two-dimensional (2D) flows and (2/3)1/2 in three-dimensional (3D) flows, where i = A,r/. The efficiency can be thought of as the specific rate of stretching of material elements normalized by a factor proportional to the square root of the energy dissipated locally. 

The dissipation factor of a polymer (which we also refer to as tan 5) is the ratio of energy lost to the energy stored when it is placed in an alternating field. The dissipation factor is analogous to a mechanical tan 8 describing rheological behavior. The dissipation factor at a specific frequency is defined according to Eq. 8.14. 

Group N6 (or some multiple thereof) is also known as a friction factor (/), because the driving force (AP) is required to overcome friction (i.e., the energy dissipated) in the pipeline (assuming it to be horizontal), and N3 is known as the Reynolds number (N e). There are various definitions of the pipe friction factor, each of which is some multiple of N6 e.g., the Fanning friction factor is N6/2, and the Darcy friction factor is 2N6. The group N4 is also known as the Euler number. 

---