Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Encoding Combinatorial Libraries

Once we have found a mixture or sublibrary that shows biological activity, how do we determine exactly which structure or stnictures are responsible for the activity We can purify and analyze as described in the previous section, but if no direct analysis is available, we need to encode or tag the support or the molecules themselves, using physical or molecular barcodes. An obvious approach that can be used only with small libraries is to physically label each vial of one-bead one-compound resin. This may be practical for a few tens of compounds, but what if we have a library of 32,(X)0 compounds, or even 1.000,000 compounds, in a mixture Clearly, there is a need for a more automated means of identifying the. structures that arc in the library. [Pg.52]

The most common approach to encoding. solid-pha.se libraries is to attach a chemical tag to the resin beads as the target molecule gets synthesized. Typically, at each step in the reaction, a tag is attached that is unique for the given step. For example, if we u c creating a tripeptide and we have 10 possible amino acids at each position, wc need to attach cither a single tag that says the tripeptidc on this bead has amino acid Ala at position I. Phe at position 2, and Oly at position 3. or wc need to attach three different tags, one for each position. [Pg.52]

One of the earliest types of chemical encoding was the attachment of oligonucleotides (usually single-strand DNA) [Pg.52]

Two types of anchors have been used to connect the DNA tags to the solid support (Fig. 3-12). In one type, the growing DNA chain is attached to the a carbon of a serine group that is anchored to the solid support by a linker molecule. The growing peptide chain is attached to the serine amino group. pos.sibly through a spacer. In the second type of anchor. the DNA chain has its own anchor to the solid suppon. In this ca.se. fewer DNA tap are attached than the number of polypeptide molecules.-  [Pg.52]

TABLE 3-1 Binary Encoding of a Tripeptide, Using 18 Possible Tags  [Pg.52]


E. A. An affinity selection-mass spectrometry method for the identification of small molecule ligands from self-encoded combinatorial libraries, discovery of a novel antagonist of E. coli dihydrofolate reductase. Int. J. Mass. Spectrom. 2004, 238, 77-83. [Pg.154]

Still, W. C. Discovery of sequence-selective peptide binding by synthetic receptors using encoded combinatorial libraries. Acc. Chem. Res. 1996,29,155-163. [Pg.38]

Burbaum JJ, Ohlmeyer MHJ, Reader JC, Henderson I, Dillard LW, Li G, Randle TL, Sigal NH, Chelsky D, Baldwin JJ. A paradigm for drug discovery employing encoded combinatorial libraries. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1995 92 6027-6031. [Pg.538]

Moran, E. J. Sarshar, S. Cargill, J. F. Shahbaz, M. M. Lio, A. M. Mjalli, A. M. M. Armstrong, R. W. Radio Frequency Tag Encoded Combinatorial Library Method for the Discovery of Tripeptide-Substituted Cinnamic Acid Inhibitors of the Protein Tyrosine Phosphatase PTP1B, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 777,10787. [Pg.188]

Lane, S. J., and Pipe, A. (2000). Single bead and hard tag decoding using accurate isotopic difference target analysis-encoded combinatorial libraries. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 14 782-793. [Pg.249]

Annis D.A., Athanasopoulos J., Curran P.J., Felsch J.S., Kalghatgi K., Lee W.H., Nash H.M., Orminati J.P.A., Rosner K.E., Shipps GW., Thaddupathy G.R.A., Tyler A.N., Vilenchik L., Wagner C.R., Wintner E.A., An affinity selection-mass spectrometry method for the identification of small molecule ligands from self-encoded combinatorial libraries. Discovery of a novel antagonist of E. coli dihydrofolate reductase Int. J. Mass Spectrom. 2004, 238, 77-83. [Pg.242]

Wagner, D. S. Markworth, C. J. Wagner, C. D. Schoenen, E J. Rewerts, C. E. Kay, B. K. Geysen, H. M. 1998. Ration encoding combinatorial libraries with stable isotopes and their utility in pharmaceutical research. Comb. Chem. High Throughput Screen, 1,143-153. [Pg.230]

Moran EJ, Sarshar S, Cargill JF, Shahbaz M, Lio A, Mjalli AMM, Armstrong RW, Radiofrequency tog encoded combinatorial library method for the discovery of tripeptide-substituted cinnamic acid inhibitors of the protein tyrosine phosphatase PTPSB J. Am. Chem. Soc., 117 10787-1788, 1995. [Pg.32]

Nielsen J, Janda KD, Toward chemical implementation of encoded combinatorial libraries, Methods Meth. Enzymol., 6 361-371, 1994. [Pg.229]

Vagner J, Barany G, Lam KS, Krchnak V, Sepetov NF, Ostrem JA, Strop P, Lebl M, Enzyme-mediated spatial segregation on individual polymeric support beads application to generation and screening of encoded combinatorial libraries, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA, 93 8194-8199, 1996. [Pg.230]

Burger MT, Still WC, Synthetic ionophores. Encoded combinatorial libraries of cyclen-based receptors for Cu(2+) and Co(2+), J. Org. Chem., 60 7382-7383, 1995. [Pg.230]

Carroll CD, Johnson TO, Tao S, Lauri G, Orlowski M, Gluzman IY, Goldnerg DE, Dolle RE, Evaluation of a structure-based statine cyclic diamino amide encoded combinatorial library against plasmepsin II and cathepsin D, Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett., 8 2315-2320, 1998. [Pg.231]

Schullek JR, Butler JH, Ni ZJ, Chen D, Yuan ZY, A high-density screening format for encoded combinatorial libraries assay miniaturization and its application to enzymatic reactions, Anal. Biochem., 246 20-29, 1997. [Pg.232]

Fitch WL, Baer TA, Chen W, Holden F, Holmes CP, Maclean D, Shah N, Sullivan E, Tang M, Wayboum P, Fischer SM, Miller CA, Snyder LR, Improved methods for encoding and decoding dialkylamine-encoded combinatorial libraries, J. Comb. Chem., 1 188-194, 1999. [Pg.232]

Rahman SS, Busby DJ, Lee DC, Infrared and Raman spectra of a single resin bead for analysis of solid-phase reactions and use in encoding combinatorial libraries, J. Org. Chem., 63 6196-6199, 1998. [Pg.233]

Armstrong RW, Tempest PA, Cargill JF, Microchip encoded combinatorial libraries, Generation of a spatially encoded library from a pool synthesis. Chimia, 50 258-260, 1996. [Pg.235]

One of the most powerful and systematic methods for the synthesis of an encoded combinatorial library is the so called split synthesis procedure (Fig. 2) [4]. [Pg.316]

Fitch et al. has recently published a new cation-exchange LC/MS method for decoding dialkylamine-encoded combinatorial libraries without the necessity to derivatise [35] and using a new tag set designed to contain unique masses for each code. We have concentrated on the development of new chromatographic and mass spectrometric methods that utilise the rapid dansyl derivatisation to improve specificity as well as chromatographic reproducibility and resolution. [Pg.167]


See other pages where Encoding Combinatorial Libraries is mentioned: [Pg.243]    [Pg.183]    [Pg.165]    [Pg.220]    [Pg.193]    [Pg.292]    [Pg.205]    [Pg.215]    [Pg.233]    [Pg.233]    [Pg.58]    [Pg.2076]    [Pg.165]    [Pg.243]   


SEARCH



Combinatorial chemistry encoded libraries

Combinatorial library

ENCODE

Encoded

Encoded combinatorial libraries

Encoded combinatorial libraries

Encoded combinatorial library binary encoding using

Encoded combinatorial library compound decoding

Encoded combinatorial library from beads

Encoded combinatorial library materials

Encoded combinatorial library preparation

Encoded libraries

Encoding

Encoding Strategies for Combinatorial Libraries

Encoding library

© 2024 chempedia.info